Re: [leaf-devel] libgmp

2010-12-23 Thread Erich Titl
Andrew at 13.12.2010 14:27, Andrew wrote: > 13.12.2010 09:54, Erich Titl пишет: >> Hi >> >> at 12.12.2010 22:52, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: >>> Am Sonntag, 12. Dezember 2010, 22:34:53 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. Currently we have libgmp 4.3.2 into buildenv, and separate libgmp 5.0.1 as pack

Re: [leaf-devel] libgmp

2010-12-23 Thread Andrew
23.12.2010 14:31, Erich Titl пишет: > Andrew > > at 13.12.2010 14:27, Andrew wrote: >> 13.12.2010 09:54, Erich Titl пишет: >>> Hi >>> >>> at 12.12.2010 22:52, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Sonntag, 12. Dezember 2010, 22:34:53 schrieb Andrew: > Hi all. > Currently we have libgmp 4.3.2 into

Re: [leaf-devel] libgmp

2010-12-23 Thread Erich Titl
Andrew at 23.12.2010 13:40, Andrew wrote: > 23.12.2010 14:31, Erich Titl пишет: >> Andrew >> >> at 13.12.2010 14:27, Andrew wrote: >>> 13.12.2010 09:54, Erich Titl пишет: Hi at 12.12.2010 22:52, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Sonntag, 12. Dezember 2010, 22:34:53 schrieb Andrew: >>>

[leaf-devel] ipsec kernel module dependency

2010-12-23 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Folks at 23.12.2010 13:40, Andrew wrote: > 23.12.2010 14:31, Erich Titl пишет: ... >> >> Erich > You don't need to rebuild all from scratch; you can just update > buildtool.cfg/buildtool.mk (or just remove them - they'll be loaded at > build) and run buildtool.pl -f buildenv. > It'll be enou

Re: [leaf-devel] libgmp

2010-12-23 Thread Andrew
Erich, I saw that you added MODULE_EXTRA_INCLUDE="-I $(BT_BUILD_DIR)/gmp/usr/include" to openswan - but it's unneeded, because files from this dir is copied into staging dir after libraries stripping. -- Learn how Orac

Re: [leaf-devel] ipsec kernel module dependency

2010-12-23 Thread Andrew
23.12.2010 16:51, Erich Titl пишет: > Hi Folks > > at 23.12.2010 13:40, Andrew wrote: >> 23.12.2010 14:31, Erich Titl пишет: > ... > >>> Erich >> You don't need to rebuild all from scratch; you can just update >> buildtool.cfg/buildtool.mk (or just remove them - they'll be loaded at >> build) and r

Re: [leaf-devel] libgmp

2010-12-23 Thread Erich Titl
Andrew at 23.12.2010 15:55, Andrew wrote: > Erich, I saw that you added MODULE_EXTRA_INCLUDE="-I > $(BT_BUILD_DIR)/gmp/usr/include" to openswan - but it's unneeded, > because files from this dir is copied into staging dir after libraries > stripping. What about the include files? cheers Eri

Re: [leaf-devel] ipsec kernel module dependency

2010-12-23 Thread Erich Titl
Andrew at 23.12.2010 15:58, Andrew wrote: ... >> >> Erich > Current buildenv doesn't support automatical package recreation after > rebuilding of some component. > It's much easier to re-create all packages :) > I know, but still there is almost a circular dependency. Every package that create

Re: [leaf-devel] ipsec kernel module dependency

2010-12-23 Thread Andrew
23.12.2010 18:56, Erich Titl пишет: > Andrew > > at 23.12.2010 15:58, Andrew wrote: > ... > >>> Erich >> Current buildenv doesn't support automatical package recreation after >> rebuilding of some component. >> It's much easier to re-create all packages :) >> > I know, but still there is almost a c

Re: [leaf-devel] libgmp

2010-12-23 Thread Andrew
23.12.2010 18:50, Erich Titl пишет: > Andrew > > at 23.12.2010 15:55, Andrew wrote: >> Erich, I saw that you added MODULE_EXTRA_INCLUDE="-I >> $(BT_BUILD_DIR)/gmp/usr/include" to openswan - but it's unneeded, >> because files from this dir is copied into staging dir after libraries >> stripping. >

Re: [leaf-devel] ipsec kernel module dependency

2010-12-23 Thread Erich Titl
Andrew on 23.12.2010 18:14, Andrew wrote: > 23.12.2010 18:56, Erich Titl пишет: >> Andrew >> .. > Yes, you're right. But moddb doesn't contains ipsec module - it contains > only essential modules that are used commonly (popular NICs, iptables). > So it isn't dependent by openswan. But where wo

Re: [leaf-devel] ipsec kernel module dependency

2010-12-23 Thread Andrew
23.12.2010 21:10, Erich Titl пишет: > Andrew > > on 23.12.2010 18:14, Andrew wrote: >> 23.12.2010 18:56, Erich Titl пишет: >>> Andrew >>> > .. > >> Yes, you're right. But moddb doesn't contains ipsec module - it contains >> only essential modules that are used commonly (popular NICs, iptables). >>

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Adding "Full" RPC support to uClibc

2010-12-23 Thread davidMbrooke
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 20:10 +, davidMbrooke wrote: > On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 18:02 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > > > Do we need also Reentrant RPC support? > > I don't believe so, at least not for an NFS server. It turns out I got this wrong. rpc.mountd uses the _r() functions so I do need

Re: [leaf-devel] ipsec kernel module dependency

2010-12-23 Thread Erich Titl
Andrew on 23.12.2010 20:25, Andrew wrote: > 23.12.2010 21:10, Erich Titl пишет: ... > If we will place all into module tarball, we just waste RAM that are > valuable on some embedded routerboards and can be spent in more rational > way.. true, memory is too valuable to be wasted > Also I thin