>
> Before 4.x we had a pretty usable vi, with probably all the bugs one can
> think of. The busybox stuff may be nice but is typically just a meager
> replacement for the REAL thing. I am under the impression that for the
> sake of new platforms and kernel features we are loosing some of the
Am Montag, 7. Juli 2014, 23:41:52 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Gents
>
> at 06.07.2014 15:02, Yves Blusseau wrote:
> > Le 6 juil. 2014 à 14:39, Yves Blusseau a écrit :
> >>> AFAIK unfortunately busybox-vi is not just a replacement, one needs to
> >>> build it with a proper toolchain, and replace init
Am Dienstag, 1. Juli 2014, 08:57:04 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> On 07/01/2014 06:26 AM, Yves Blusseau wrote:
> > Le 29 juin 2014 à 18:28, Yves Blusseau a écrit :
> >>> Mike, your help and insights are appreciated, and I guess none of us
> >>> will, or would have complained (maybe a little bit as usual :
On 07/08/2014 10:44 AM, kp kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Mike; any chance you can provide an export soon to maintain a proper
> wiki until mediawiki is available again?
> The import to SF wiki wasn't as lossless as we thought (e.g. the
> Changelog page for 5.x has lost entries) and it would be great to ha
