Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros

Hi Erich; Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > I looked at ma newly installed system and it looks like the patch I > wrote to fully enable atheros wireless chips was not applied to the > kernel modules. > > Please advise Lokks like it has been lost during

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: [leaf:packages] New commit by kapeka

Am Montag, 28. September 2015, 19:08:32 schrieb Erich Titl: > Am 28.09.2015 um 17:48 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hello Erich; > > > > Am Sonntag, 27. September 2015, 13:55:34 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi KP > >> I checked the contents of the 5_2 directory this morning using > >> build_upgrade > >>

Re: [leaf-devel] shorewall

Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 08:58:17 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Tom > > Am 30.09.2015 um 03:36 schrieb Tom Eastep: > > On 9/29/2015 3:59 PM, Erich Titl wrote: > >> Hi Tom > >> > >> Am 30.09.2015 um 00:34 schrieb Tom Eastep: > >> ... > >> > >>> AUTOHELPERS=Yes doesn't cause helpers to be loade

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: [leaf:packages] New commit by kapeka

Hi KP Am 30.09.2015 um 16:45 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Am Montag, 28. September 2015, 19:08:32 schrieb Erich Titl: ... >> >> Well, I did not want to interfere with the current set up although I >> _believe_ it is incoprehensibly complicated. That is why I wrote a tool >> to juggle the content to

Re: [leaf-devel] shorewall

Hi Folks Am 30.09.2015 um 16:49 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 08:58:17 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Hi Tom >> >> Am 30.09.2015 um 03:36 schrieb Tom Eastep: I got it running, well partially, and as usual the culprit could be found by looking in the mirror. The problem was

Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros

Hi KP Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Hi Erich; > > Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Hi Folks >> >> I looked at ma newly installed system and it looks like the patch I >> wrote to fully enable atheros wireless chips was not applied to the >> kerne

Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros

Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hi Erich; > > > > Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi Folks > >> > >> I looked at ma newly installed system and it looks like the patch

Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros

Am 30.09.2015 um 18:30 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Hi KP >> >> Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: >>> Hi Erich; >>> >>> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I looked at ma n

Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros

Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 18:56:15 schrieb Erich Titl: > Am 30.09.2015 um 18:30 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi KP > >> > >> Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > >>> Hi Erich; > >>> > >>> Am Dienstag, 29. Septe

Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros

Hi KP Am 30.09.2015 um 19:19 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 18:56:15 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Am 30.09.2015 um 18:30 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:.. > > I still do not understand. > > I'm rebuilding branch maint with the patch applied and will test on my > machine. > > If

[leaf-devel] Upgrade to 5.2 woes (solved)

Hi Folks For those of you who read the many messages about upgrading my wireless router to 5.2, here is the explanation of what had happened. Upgrade used a wong algorithm to combine initrd and initmod, so a number of modules were not loaded. This led to a plethora of weird symptoms which were ha