Hi kp,
I just noticed that the "Git Repository" link from
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/ is pointing at the leaf/leaf Git
repository and now it should really point at leaf/bering-uclibc instead.
It's not urgent but please would you correct when you get chance.
Thanks,
davidMbrooke
On 3 Jul 2011, at 14:30, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 10:17 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 1. Juli 2011, 15:52:49 schrieb Mike Noyes:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:52 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>>> -snip-
>>>
> I was running into a similar problem when changi
On 4 Jul 2011, at 23:20, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 23:37 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
>> Hi David
>>
>> on 04.07.2011 21:06, david M brooke wrote:
>>>
>> ...
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> My build host is running
On 5 Jul 2011, at 19:07, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>
> David, I think ticket #48 can be solved quickly.
> Will you take care of?
Hi kp,
Yes, I will fix.
dMb
--
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriou
Hi,
In case anyone is not aware, the Ohloh directory of Free and Open Source
Software (http://www.ohloh.net/) has an entry for the LEAF Project that Mike
created some time ago, see http://www.ohloh.net/p/leaf. One nice feature is
that Ohloh does some analysis on source code retrieved from versi
On 17 Dec 2011, at 18:56, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>
> Does any of the telephony applications (yate, asterisk) do need ISDN
> support?
Asterisk does not need ISDN and I don't think yate does either (though I
haven't checked).
> Otherwise it may removed from the kernel.
>
> kp
I think it is OK t
On 6 Jan 2012, at 23:19, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am 06.01.2012 18:39, schrieb Mike Noyes:
>> Everyone,
>> SF staff interview regarding LEAF.
>>
>>http://sourceforge.net/blog/podcast-leaf/
>>
>>
>> David and others that helped,
>> Thanks for attending to this. :-)
>>
>
> Well done David.
Hi Yves,
Compile is fine for me - I did a complete re-build from scratch
(tools/buildall.sh) to check my changes and everything was "green".
Maybe I have missed something which affects your build environment but not mine
(I build on 64-bit Fedora 16).
I am CCing the leaf-devel list: Andrew, kp
On 2 Apr 2012, at 17:04, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am 01.04.2012 00:14, schrieb davidMbrooke:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I *finally* got my ARM toolchain to compile! Seems there are some issues
>> with NPTL on ARM (both for uClibc 0.9.32.1 and 0.9.33) so I have
>> reverted to the "new" pthread implementati
On 11 Apr 2012, at 14:16, Yves Blusseau wrote:
> Le 23/04/2012 11:31, Andrew a écrit :
>> 11.04.2012 11:20, Erich Titl написал:
>>> Hi Andrew
>>>
>>> at 23.04.2012 10:07, Andrew wrote:
11.04.2012 09:36, Erich Titl написал:
> Hi Andrew
>
> at 22.04.2012 23:20, Andrew wrote:
On 23 Apr 2012, at 20:20, Andrew wrote:
> 11.04.2012 21:36, david M brooke написал:
>> On 11 Apr 2012, at 14:16, Yves Blusseau wrote:
>>
>>> Le 23/04/2012 11:31, Andrew a écrit :
>>>> 11.04.2012 11:20, Erich Titl написал:
>>>>> Hi An
On 26 Apr 2012, at 16:07, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 07:26 AM, Mike Noyes wrote:
>> On 04/22/2012 04:45 AM, davidMbrooke wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've added a Software Infobox to our Wikipedia page
>>> (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/LEAF_Project).
>>> I was going to upl
Hi all,
I've just upgraded my build host to Fedora 17 and I'm attempting a full rebuild
of BuC 4.x. This failed because the attempt to download mpfr-2.3.2.tar.bz2 from
www.mpfr.org doesn't work because that server is not currently responding.
I have located a copy of mpfr-2.3.2.tar.bz2 from els
Looks like it's back online now so no need for any immediate action.
We also have an obligation to provide source code for everything we ship as
part of each LEAF distribution, in order to comply with the terms of most of
the open source licenses, and it's *much* easier to do that if we have a
On 11 Jun 2012, at 17:49, Andrew wrote:
> Hi all.
> I noticed that there are some packages that are built with errors. Some
> of them I fixed (for ex., shorewall6 - it installs init file as
> shorewall, not shorewall6, and so on), and some of them have unresolved
> dependencies (includes), amo
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 17:55 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi;
>
> librpcsecgss fails to build in fresh build in the next branch.
>
> include/rpcsecgss/rpc/auth_gss.h:41:27: fatal error: gssapi/gssapi.h: No
> such file or directory
>
> It builds fine after the build went trough in a second try.
Hi all,
My Raspberry Pi Model B, on order since April, arrived yesterday. After a few
hours of work I have it running BuC 5.x very nicely. Only a Proof of Concept at
this stage, but it shows that it can be done. Screen, keyboard and network are
all working OK and LRP package loading and saving
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 21:27 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 02.07.2012 21:01, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Am 01.07.2012 23:43, schrieb david M brooke:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> My Raspberry Pi Model B, on order since April, arrived yesterday. After a
> >> few
Hi all (especially Andrew),
Once we step outside the comfortable world of x86 platforms our old
friends SYSLINUX, ISOLINUX and PXELINUX don't work.
My initial testing of the Raspberry Pi has been using the specific rules
for what needs to included on its SD card, but LEAF is a generic
framework s
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 23:50 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> What showstoppers we have for tagging BuC 5.0-alpha release? I saw that
> samba still fails to build due to headers missing (uuid/uuid.h).
I am currently seeing a clean build for all packages when using the i486
toolchain
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 18:54 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Current git sources build fine for x86 and I had only one error
> (oprofile) for arm-versatile.
I also get that one build error on any non-x86 platform.
The OpenWrt team have the same problem, and they have a patch to fix :-)
See https:
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 11:50 +0100, david M brooke wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 23:50 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> >
> > What showstoppers we have for tagging BuC 5.0-alpha release? I saw that
> > samba still fails to build due to headers missing (uuid/uuid.h).
>
> I
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 12:00 +0300, Andrew wrote:
>
> I finished merge; it seems that there is no troubles - but I haven't
> time to re-check this. So anybody pls update to new master and try to
> compile all.
Completely new clone of master builds OK for me :-) - 201 packages, all
"green"
And 4
Hi leaf-devel,
I've been busy with other things for a while and I haven't had much time
for LEAF development. However there are a couple of new projects I'm
doing with LEAF and some of the work is of general interest (though some
of it probably isn't!).
Since I last did much LEAF development I un
Hi kp,
Thanks for the responses.
On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 00:13 +0100, KP Kirchdörfer wrote:
> Hi David;
>
> Am Freitag, 7. Februar 2014, 21:09:32 schrieb David M Brooke:
> > Hi leaf-devel,
> >
> > I've been busy with other things for a while and I haven't h
Hi Jim,
It’s been a long while since I tried using qemu to emulate a RaspberryPi
but I did get it to work. Probably kp has more recent experience.
There are some notes at
http://bering-uclibc.zetam.org/wiki/Bering-uClibc_5.x_-_User_Guide_-_Appendices_-_Working_with_Disk_Image_Files
(the very la
Hi Erich,
I added that code in 2012 in response to a user request.
The need for findfs was flagged up at the time.
See http://sourceforge.net/p/leaf/mailman/message/29449905/
David
> On 23 Dec 2015, at 10:16, Erich Titl wrote:
>
> Hi Folks
>
> Looking at linuxrc I see that there is some cod
27 matches
Mail list logo
