Someone get pptpd working on bering-uclibc?
I had a working pptpd on bering 1.2, now I wanted to upgrade to
bering-uclibc but id does not work;
the configuration is the same and I cannot find out where is the
problem, I cannot see nothing strange on the logfiles;
I've tried with bering-uclibc
Am Dienstag, 13. Juli 2004 03:06 schrieb Chris Lee:
Hi,
Can anyone kindly to send an old version of OpenVPNZ package, as the one on
the web seems broken.
You'll find older versions in the cvs repository:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/20/openvpnz.lrp
kp
Package declaration and modules loading has been changed in the 2.2 cycle,
amongst other changes.
A complete update of all packages is probably safer.
And it may help to read the docs about new leaf.cfg:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/buc-install.html
On Wed, 07 Jul, 2004 at 00:41:31 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
I have a 2.4.24 kernel environment which I use for the pcengines
kernel, you may want to have a look
http://www.think.ch/leaf/styx/2.4.20/
Great! (that would be: http://www.think.ch/leaf/styx/2.4.24/)
I'm getting
Jon
At 14:55 13.07.2004 +0200, you wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jul, 2004 at 00:41:31 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
I have a 2.4.24 kernel environment which I use for the pcengines
kernel, you may want to have a look
http://www.think.ch/leaf/styx/2.4.20/
Great! (that would be:
For sure dnscache is not starting with daemon tools. I can see that at
the tail end of the bering load process.
Two things.
First, I don't have a menu item for daemontools under packages in lrcfg.
There are no commands like svc, svcscan etc. From / a find . -name svc
shows no executable.
So
Hi Folks
This is more a memento for the above mentioned issues than a question. I fell into a
few gotchas today, so I might as well share, maybe someone has had similar experience
and can advise.
I installed an embedded router as a VPN endpoint today using the pcengines Bering 1.2
version. It
Jon
At 17:23 13.07.2004 +0200, Jon Clausen wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul, 2004 at 16:16:48 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
Jon
snip
Next step is to get the 'Bering patches' applied.
Look into the Makefile it's easy to extend if you like it.
Indeed this looks nice. Sadly I don't fully understand
Rick
At 17:17 13.07.2004, Tibbs, Richard wrote:
For sure dnscache is not starting with daemon tools. I can see that at
the tail end of the bering load process.
Two things.
First, I don't have a menu item for daemontools under packages in lrcfg.
Mprobably not installed
There are no
Thanks for the help.
I missed the PKGPATH variable in the leaf.cfg file. Everything is working
now.
Have a great day!
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K.-P.
Kirchdörfer
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 1:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello list..
Trying to implement IPSEC tunnels on my Bering 1.2 fw.
A few inauspicious lines from the debug log:
Jul 13 11:35:37 firewall pluto[29061]: | from whack: got --esp=3des
Jul 13 11:35:37 firewall pluto[29061]: | from whack: got --ike=3des
Jul 13 11:35:37 firewall pluto[29061]: | from
Ryan Rich wrote:
begin diagnostics
firewall# ip addr list
1: lo: LOOPBACK,UP mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
2: dummy0: BROADCAST,NOARP mtu 1500 qdisc noop
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3:
Ryan Rich wrote:
I am curious what other methods will work for what I am trying to do if
there are indeed no who-has requests being made on the network. Is
the kernel in Bering uClibc compiled with the necessary patches to use
the bridging features of shorewall?
If the appropriate arp requests
At 12:40 PM 7/13/2004 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Ryan Rich wrote:
I am curious what other methods will work for what I am trying to do if
there are indeed no who-has requests being made on the network. Is the
kernel in Bering uClibc compiled with the necessary patches to use the
Rick
At 19:00 13.07.2004, you wrote:
Erich, thanks...
But.. But... I have daemontl.lrp in the Berign CD already :-)
I don't know if using a different one will help (and the one from Charles
Steinkuehler's Bering CD site may be identical -- they look like the same
sizes).
Below is my current
Well, the win2000pro machine is up to service pack 4, and the ipsec
section of the Bering user's guide says it needs at least service pack
2.. I will check microsquish for any missing patches.
It is not possible to move my win2000 machine across the router,
because I am at work.
And I suspect
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
Well, the win2000pro machine is up to service pack 4, and the ipsec
section of the Bering user's guide says it needs at least service pack
2.. I will check microsquish for any missing patches.
It is not possible to move my win2000 machine across the router,
because I am at
Ryan Rich wrote:
Well, I was about to give up on this whole thing and try a different
approach... I came in this morning ready to give this one last shot and
when I booted up the leaf machine this morning everything worked!!! I
don't know if this was an ARP Cache issue like Tom mentions in the
I've been using LRP and now LEAF for years, and think it's excellent!
I know this is probably a pathetic question (in that it's not directed
at core functionality - which is already great), but is there any way
to improve the weblet interface?
Specifically most of the other Linux based firewalls
Hmmm. Thanks everyone, but --
Maybe the bering user's guide should be updated to say ping again!!
I poked around the freeswan site and noticed this.
Here is what I had to do:
Ping once (and fail) and then the connection is open (I guess?). Ping
again, and all is well.
Maybe windoze ping, which
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Ryan Rich wrote:
Well, I was about to give up on this whole thing and try a different
approach... I came in this morning ready to give this one last shot and
when I booted up the leaf machine this morning everything worked!!! I
don't know if this was an ARP Cache
Tom Eastep wrote:
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Ryan Rich wrote:
By the way, the private ip address does work as the address for eth1, but
per your advice I will change this to the same addresses I used for the
eth0 interface if this is a more commonly accepted practice.
If it works as a private
Hm... forgot the list :)
-
Nick,
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 22:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Specifically most of the other Linux based firewalls show traffic
graphs, and are also configurable via a web interface. Personally I
don't mind having to configure the firewall using SSH, but I'd
Am Dienstag, 13. Juli 2004 22:42 schrieb Robert Sprockeels:
Hm... forgot the list :)
-
Nick,
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 22:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Specifically most of the other Linux based firewalls show traffic
graphs, and are also configurable via a web interface. Personally
Ok, so this may have been done before, but for the life of me I could not
find it documented. I have in the past been able to get CPU graphed via
SNMP, but sometimes I want to see it right now.
Although the application is quite useful, I have found that the
documentation is somewhat limited for
Tomaso, I have pptpd working in Bering uCLib 1.2 (I think!! Definitely
is uCLib though).
I used the packages here:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=91017page_id=51
I don't recall having much trouble once I had loaded all the necessary
kernel modules.
David Pitts
26 matches
Mail list logo
