When Bering uClibC boots up, I get the following messages for snort and
squid-2 packages:
1. Syslog: Fatal error: log directory `/var/log/snort' does not exist.
2. /var/cache: directory does not exist.
I created /var/log/snort and /var/cache and backup the initrd and etc
packages but get the
Hi Godfried;
the squid-2 init should create /var/cache and give it the correct permission.
It's IMHO useless to save /var/cache, so this message is somewhat intended.
Let me know if squid has still problems.
kp
Am Montag, 26. Juli 2004 14:36 schrieb Godfried Duodu:
When Bering uClibC boots
Am Montag, 26. Juli 2004 04:32 schrieb William (Andy) Smith:
Is there a doc on the steps for me to take current Bering-uClibc 2.2-beta5
and generate an ISO out of it with the usual packages and such? Or would
someone mind generating one for me? I'd like to kick it around but burning
an ISO
After long delay getting back to this...
Thanks, Erich!
Yes, nat_traversal=yes removes the [disabled] portion of the auth.log record. This is
on both firewalls below.
But, I am having other problems with the home win2k machine.
What I am doing is using Bering 1.2 at both home and work
Rick
At 19:56 26.07.2004, you wrote:
After long delay getting back to this...
Thanks, Erich!
Yes, nat_traversal=yes removes the [disabled] portion of the auth.log
record. This is on both firewalls below.
Mhhh, so nat-traversal is compiled in
But, I am having other problems with the home win2k
From Tom's response I gather that he'd directing me to the shorewall
doc'n in order that I might provide more diag info.
(In my own defence I would propose that I had been compliant with what's
suggested therein: If you receive an error message when starting or
restarting the firewall and you
freeman groups wrote:
From Tom's response I gather that he'd directing me to the shorewall
doc'n in order that I might provide more diag info.
I posted a follow up to this on this list over the weekend but I wasn't
subscribed to the list at the time -- that followup is still languishing
Is it possible to setup more than can one OpenVPN tunnel per Server?
If yes, how?
i.e. Main Server --Tunnel upd:5000-- Server A
^--Tunnel upd:5001-- Server B
^--Tunnel upd:5002-- Server C
I am using Bering-uClibc_2.2-beta5 w/ OpenVPN ver 1.6.0 Rev 1
Many thanks
I wonder if these Axiomtech people would be willing to sell a bunch of
these at a good price to LEAF users. They have a lot more options than
Linksys and run a compact flash. They would be worth two or three times
the price of a Linksys.
