To Both Ray O. and Charles S.:
questions beget questions beget questions beget questions. - EW,
senior year high school, 1975
Where to begin? First, thanks for the help.
I definitely agree, the setup is weird, and even (especially) I, don't
know how it actually works, but it does. The
Ray O. and Charles S.
Sorry about the funky diagram, hope this one is better:
LEAF -(Comcast cable modem)
|
|
4-PORT HUB --- RH (eth0=192.168.0.4
/eth1=192.168.1.200)
, sorry about the funky diagram.
Earl
- Original Message -
From: Earl Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] routing issue with Dachstein
Ray O. and Charles S.
Sorry about the funky diagram, hope this one is better
LEAF is located between the cable modem and 4-port hub, sorry
- Original Message -
From: Earl Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 9:45 AM
Subject: Fw: [leaf-user] routing issue with Dachstein
an artist, I'm not ( oh well)
to explain
issue with Dachstein
LEAF is located between the cable modem and 4-port hub, sorry
- Original Message -
From: Earl Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 9:45 AM
Subject: Fw: [leaf-user] routing issue with Dachstein
an artist, I'm not ( oh
Earl Wilson wrote:
snip
Thanks for the network diagram...I figured that's how you had things
setup, but it's nice to verify.
I thought I had turned the
firewall off on the rh box during a previous re-install, but with your
suggestions, I got the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# ipchains -nvL
Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Earl Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] routing issue with Dachstein
Earl Wilson wrote:
snip
Thanks for the network diagram...I figured that's how you had things
setup, but it's nice
OK. We can survive the problems with the ASCII art; your setup isn't really
that hard t describe in words ... and anyway, all the 192.168.0.0/24 stuff
should be irrelevent to the problem you're reporting. More puzzling is what
is left as a possible source of the problem.
First, now that I see
At 10:19 AM 2/12/2004 -0500, Earl Wilson wrote:
Ray and Charles:
I turned the iptables fw off on the red hat box, and am now able to ping
and browse w/mozilla, but only by ip rather than name resolution.
Hmmm ... I'm curious about this result. Since you had no firewalling in
place on the RH
At 12:07 PM 2/12/2004 -0500, Earl Wilson wrote:
To Review:
Upon your suggestions concerning DNS - the culprit was 2 fold:
1.) MSN (and all other M$ websites) seemed to have taken away the
ability to successfully ping them (right on the money, Charles) - I had
no problems when I pinged the ip
Earl Wilson wrote:
I assume that due to the fact that the rh box is now using the ipmasq
abilities of the Dachstein box, that the rh box still has firewall
protection (please correct me if I'm wrong on this statement).
Yes, the RedHat box is behind your Dachstein firewall, and so is
protected
Community:
I am a Linux noob who has installed Linux firewall 2.2.19-3-LEAF via
floppy on a P120, and setup as a firewall. I have it successfully
routing to my WinMe machine. The WinMe machine is also on a separate
home internal network (eg., 2 networks, 192.168.0.x and 192.168.1.x),
and has
Earl Wilson wrote:
Community:
I am a Linux noob who has installed Linux firewall 2.2.19-3-LEAF via
floppy on a P120, and setup as a firewall. I have it successfully
routing to my WinMe machine. The WinMe machine is also on a separate
home internal network (eg., 2 networks, 192.168.0.x and
13 matches
Mail list logo
