Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein, 2 internal nets routing

2003-09-27 Thread George Metz
Negative, 192.168.0/23 will route 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24 but ignore 192.168.2.0/24. You'd need to do a /22 to do aggregate routing with the specified /24s, and at that you'd have two /24s floating in limbo. Victor McAllister wrote: Dachstein will not route between interfaces unless

Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein, 2 internal nets routing

2003-09-26 Thread Mark Bynum
Richard, Two questions: 1. What is wrong with Dachstein? Is it insecure? 2. I've tried your suggestions and still I can't ping either internal network from the other. But, I do know have a new route: 192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.1.254 dev eth1 The other one didn't take. I don't know why. Any

Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein, 2 internal nets routing

2003-09-26 Thread Victor McAllister
Mark Bynum wrote: Richard, Two questions: 1. What is wrong with Dachstein? Is it insecure? 2. I've tried your suggestions and still I can't ping either internal network from the other. But, I do know have a new route: 192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.1.254 dev eth1 The other one didn't take. I

Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein, 2 internal nets routing

2003-09-26 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Mark Bynum wrote: All, It shouldn't be this hard. All I'm trying to do is route between my two internal networks of 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0. Here is what I have: INTERN_NET=192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24 eth1_ROUTES=192.168.2.0/24_via_192.168.2.254 eth2_ROUTES=192.168.1.0/24_via_192.168.1.254

Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein, 2 internal nets routing

2003-09-25 Thread Richard Doyle
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 21:37, Mark Bynum wrote: All, It shouldn't be this hard. All I'm trying to do is route between my two internal networks of 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0. Here is what I have: INTERN_NET=192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24 eth1_ROUTES=192.168.2.0/24_via_192.168.2.254