Negative, 192.168.0/23 will route 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24
but ignore 192.168.2.0/24. You'd need to do a /22 to do aggregate
routing with the specified /24s, and at that you'd have two /24s
floating in limbo.
Victor McAllister wrote:
Dachstein will not route between interfaces unless
Richard,
Two questions:
1. What is wrong with Dachstein? Is it insecure?
2. I've tried your suggestions and still I can't ping either internal
network from the other. But, I do know have a new route:
192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.1.254 dev eth1
The other one didn't take. I don't know why.
Any
Mark Bynum wrote:
Richard,
Two questions:
1. What is wrong with Dachstein? Is it insecure?
2. I've tried your suggestions and still I can't ping either internal
network from the other. But, I do know have a new route:
192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.1.254 dev eth1
The other one didn't take. I
Mark Bynum wrote:
All,
It shouldn't be this hard. All I'm trying to do is route between my two
internal networks of 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0. Here is what I have:
INTERN_NET=192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24
eth1_ROUTES=192.168.2.0/24_via_192.168.2.254
eth2_ROUTES=192.168.1.0/24_via_192.168.1.254
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 21:37, Mark Bynum wrote:
All,
It shouldn't be this hard. All I'm trying to do is route between my two
internal networks of 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0. Here is what I have:
INTERN_NET=192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24
eth1_ROUTES=192.168.2.0/24_via_192.168.2.254