Re: [leaf-user] comparison passive ftp clients Dachstein vs Bering

2003-08-22 Thread Victor McAllister
Tom Eastep wrote: On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 12:12, Victor McAllister wrote: My friend is still troubleshooting why Dachstein works with an internal passive ftp client SENDING a file and Bering fails. System is PPPoE He ran tdpdump in passive ftp mode . Dachstein showns the mss at differnt

RE: [leaf-user] Bering UclibC development

2003-08-22 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi, I know I have asked before, but I have lost all past emails and any links that were given to me in regard to this question. I have finally gotten to the point that I need to set up a Leaf Bering UclibC development environment. I have downloaded the root_woody_fs and UML kernel and

Re: [leaf-user] Operation not supported by device

2003-08-22 Thread Erich Titl
Darcy At 10:00 21.08.2003, Darcy Parker wrote: Good day listers, I ma trying to set up a leaf-bering (1.2) FW. I have the following two NICs You better read http://www.scyld.com/network/vortex.html this is IMHO the definite information source on that driver. HTH Erich THINK

Re: [leaf-user] Operation not supported by device

2003-08-22 Thread Tony
HI guys, Are the two nics recognized? (i.e. what is the output of ip addr show). I do not believe you need the tulip and the natsemi modules loaded. Check the Ethernet How-To at the LDP to see what modules support what cards and whether or not the PCI-Scan module is needed (I don't think it is

[leaf-user] RE: [leaf-devel] Quick question about Weblet/Bering UClibc

2003-08-22 Thread Tony
HI Sean, Actually, I was using the file from the UClibc dist on a regular Bering (Glibc 2.0.7) dist. I wasn't seeing a segfault, so I figured it was an HTML error (I was also tweaking the weblet app). The funny thing is, I downloaded the source for parsefw to my development box running in UML,

Re: [leaf-user] Bering UclibC development

2003-08-22 Thread K.-P. Kirchdrfer
Am Donnerstag, 21. August 2003 19:39 schrieb Charles Holbrook: I know I have asked before, but I have lost all past emails and any links that were given to me in regard to this question. I have finally gotten to the point that I need to set up a Leaf Bering UclibC development environment. I

RE: [leaf-user] Operation not supported by device

2003-08-22 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Good day listers, I ma trying to set up a leaf-bering (1.2) FW. I have the following two NICs 3C905-TXIRQ10 D800 3C905-TXIRQ9D400 I am loading the following modules 3c59x.o Only this module is needed. netsemi.o tulip.o When it gets to configuing the NICs

Re: [leaf-user] Operation not supported by device

2003-08-22 Thread Huy Bui
You don't nee natsemi.o and tulip.o for 3com 3c905 Nics. Comment them out. They are for tulip and national semiconductor chipset NICs Huy - Original Message - From: Darcy Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:00 AM Subject: [leaf-user] Operation

Re: [leaf-user] Operation not supported by device

2003-08-22 Thread Julian Church
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 02:00:48 -0600, Darcy Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have the following two NICs 3C905-TXIRQ10 D800 3C905-TXIRQ9D400 I am loading the following modules 3c59x.o netsemi.o tulip.o When it gets to configuing the NICs I get the following errors insmod

Re: [leaf-user] comparison passive ftp clients Dachstein vs Bering

2003-08-22 Thread Tom Eastep
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 18:48, Victor McAllister wrote: My friend commented out ip_conntrack_ftp and ip_nat_ftp in modules rebooted and everything works perfectly. Sometime when he has some time we will have to do some more troubleshooting using tcpdump. I only saw the external IP

RE: [leaf-user] Bering UclibC development

2003-08-22 Thread Erich Titl
Hi At 09:06 22.08.2003 +0100, Luis.F.Correia wrote: ... The current uClibc development does not use UML. What is the minimal environment then for: a) Kernel compile Is it really different from the Bering standard kernel enviroonment? I always thought Kernels are library independent...? b)

[leaf-user] Whole reason for setting up the development environement

2003-08-22 Thread Charles Holbrook
I had asked a while back about the potential inclusion of IPVS netfilter support in the kernel. http://www.ntua.gr/lvsp/software/ipvs.html I was just kind of wondering if this has been looked at for inclusion in the 2.0 release of Bering UclibC? I have looked through the current changelogs and

Re: [leaf-user] Whole reason for setting up the development environement

2003-08-22 Thread K.-P. Kirchdrfer
Am Samstag, 23. August 2003 00:58 schrieb Charles Holbrook: I had asked a while back about the potential inclusion of IPVS netfilter support in the kernel. http://www.ntua.gr/lvsp/software/ipvs.html I was just kind of wondering if this has been looked at for inclusion in the 2.0 release of

Re: [leaf-user] Bering UclibC development

2003-08-22 Thread K.-P. Kirchdörfer
Am Freitag, 22. August 2003 13:51 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi At 09:06 22.08.2003 +0100, Luis.F.Correia wrote: ... The current uClibc development does not use UML. What is the minimal environment then for: a) Kernel compile Is it really different from the Bering standard kernel enviroonment?

[leaf-user] Re: Operation not supported by device // NICs and Modules crossreference.

2003-08-22 Thread Darcy Parker
Thnaks to all who replied. I have the firewall up and running now with only 3c59x.o for a driver. I am considering setting up a web page with a table that shows which specfic drivers are needed for specific NIC's with links to the approrite drivers. I understand that each driver needs to be