on 13.10.2014 21:41, Victor McAllister wrote:
> On 10/13/2014 12:25 PM, Andrew wrote:
>
> it complained about memory and unavailability of modules.dep but it
> extracted natsemi and built the moddb.lrp at 1.3 mb.
>
> I then changed it back to syst_size=40M and rebooted
>
> everything works wit
on 13.10.2014 21:25, Andrew wrote:
> 13.10.2014 21:43, Erich Titl пишет:
>> on 13.10.2014 19:52, Andrew wrote:
>>> 13.10.2014 19:48, Victor McAllister пишет:
>> ...
...
>> Couldn't we use a tempfs for unpacking and building modules.dep?
>>
> What profit of this we'll have?
- It would not need to
On 10/13/2014 12:25 PM, Andrew wrote:
> 13.10.2014 21:43, Erich Titl пишет:
>> on 13.10.2014 19:52, Andrew wrote:
>>> 13.10.2014 19:48, Victor McAllister пишет:
>> ...
Victor
>>> You should increase rootfs size. AFAIR /tmp does nothing in modules
>>> detection; modules are unpacked into /lib/m
13.10.2014 21:43, Erich Titl пишет:
> on 13.10.2014 19:52, Andrew wrote:
>> 13.10.2014 19:48, Victor McAllister пишет:
> ...
>>> Victor
>> You should increase rootfs size. AFAIR /tmp does nothing in modules
>> detection; modules are unpacked into /lib/modules which is part of / tmpfs.
>> Also check
on 13.10.2014 19:52, Andrew wrote:
> 13.10.2014 19:48, Victor McAllister пишет:
...
>>
>> Victor
> You should increase rootfs size. AFAIR /tmp does nothing in modules
> detection; modules are unpacked into /lib/modules which is part of / tmpfs.
> Also check if you have enough free RAM (you may try
on 13.10.2014 15:53, kp kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Montag, 13. Oktober 2014, 15:33:26 schrieb Erich Titl:
..
>>>
>>> It seems like there is not enough memory/ramdisk space for extracted
>>> modules. They requires approx 20 MB of free mem/free ramdisk.
>>
>> Second this, same experience
>
> Will it
13.10.2014 19:48, Victor McAllister пишет:
> On 10/13/2014 6:53 AM, kp kirchdoerfer wrote:
>> Am Montag, 13. Oktober 2014, 15:33:26 schrieb Erich Titl:
>>> Hi Andrew
>>>
>>> on 13.10.2014 10:32, Andrew wrote:
Hi.
13.10.2014 09:47, Victor McAllister пишет:
> I tried this on an old
On 10/13/2014 6:53 AM, kp kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Montag, 13. Oktober 2014, 15:33:26 schrieb Erich Titl:
>> Hi Andrew
>>
>> on 13.10.2014 10:32, Andrew wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> 13.10.2014 09:47, Victor McAllister пишет:
I tried this on an old WRAP board. Everything worked except the find
m
Am Montag, 13. Oktober 2014, 15:33:26 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Andrew
>
> on 13.10.2014 10:32, Andrew wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > 13.10.2014 09:47, Victor McAllister пишет:
> >> I tried this on an old WRAP board. Everything worked except the find
> >> modules for hardware.
> >>
> >> lrcfg complained
Hi Andrew
on 13.10.2014 10:32, Andrew wrote:
> Hi.
>
> 13.10.2014 09:47, Victor McAllister пишет:
>> I tried this on an old WRAP board. Everything worked except the find
>> modules for hardware.
>>
>> lrcfg complained about unavailability of modules.dep even though this
>> file was located in /li
Hi.
13.10.2014 09:47, Victor McAllister пишет:
> I tried this on an old WRAP board. Everything worked except the find
> modules for hardware.
>
> lrcfg complained about unavailability of modules.dep even though this
> file was located in /lib/modules/ and modules.tgz was available.
It seems like t
11 matches
Mail list logo