RE: [leaf-user] Compact Flash VS. disk-on-module VS. disk-on-chip ?

2002-10-21 Thread Erich Titl
Hi you may want to have a look at http://luna.think.ch/leaf/ADM it has a description how I modified the standard SST/Apacer ADM for write protection Erich S Mohan wrote the following at 14:05 14.10.2002: I've been involved in a thread and have been doing some work too. Overall, DoM seems to be

Re: [leaf-user] Compact Flash VS. disk-on-module VS. disk-on-chip ?

2002-10-21 Thread Brad Fritz
A week late and slightly off-topic, but... On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:35:58 +0530 S Mohan wrote: I've been involved in a thread and have been doing some work too. Overall, DoM seems to be the best option as it works on Std IDE drivers unlike DoC which requires drivers and kernel recompile.

RE: [leaf-user] Compact Flash VS. disk-on-module VS. disk-on-chip ?

2002-10-14 Thread S Mohan
I've been involved in a thread and have been doing some work too. Overall, DoM seems to be the best option as it works on Std IDE drivers unlike DoC which requires drivers and kernel recompile. It also supports 1M writes as against CF which is 10K. Write protect is possible in Smart media but not

RE: [leaf-user] Compact Flash VS. disk-on-module VS. disk-on-chip ?

2002-10-14 Thread Erich Titl
Hi At 14:05 14.10.2002, you wrote: I've been involved in a thread and have been doing some work too. Overall, DoM seems to be the best option as it works on Std IDE drivers unlike DoC which requires drivers and kernel recompile. It also supports 1M writes as against CF which is 10K. Write