On Thu 2015-01-15T03:24:43 +, Alex Currant via LEAPSECS hath writ:
The ITU link says there will be 2-3 minutes discrepancy by 2100.
At the current rate of 1 every 3 years, we would expect 80/3, or
26.667 seconds discrepancy. I have found a reference which
estimates the effect of the tidal
In message 17038998.837509.1421292283082.javamail.ya...@jws100167.mail.ne1.yah
oo.com, Alex Currant via LEAPSECS writes:
Who is right?
That reminds me, has anybody tried to do the math on climate change ?
The main effect is (probably?) going to be the thermal expansion of
the worlds
The ITU link says there will be 2-3 minutes discrepancy by 2100. At the
current rate of 1 every 3 years, we would expect 80/3, or 26.667 seconds
discrepancy. I have found a reference which estimates the effect of the tidal
slow-down and predicts that the discrepancy will still be less than
Le 14.01.2015 04:28, Steve Allen a écrit :
On Tue 2015-01-13T11:03:35 -0500, Brooks Harris hath writ:
This year's Y2K: 'Leap second' threatens to break the Internet
http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/13/technology/leap-second/index.html [1]
In that article is a link to a recent version of the
On Tue 2015-01-13T11:03:35 -0500, Brooks Harris hath writ:
This year's Y2K: 'Leap second' threatens to break the Internet
http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/13/technology/leap-second/index.html
In that article is a link to a recent version of the Draft CPM
document with the options that are being
Brooks Harris bro...@edlmax.com wrote:
|This year's Y2K: 'Leap second' threatens to break the Internet
|http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/13/technology/leap-second/index.html
I liked very much that one of the first things Jobs' widow did was
to spend money for high quality journalism.
Oh man, *how*
This year's Y2K: 'Leap second' threatens to break the Internet
http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/13/technology/leap-second/index.html
-Brooks
___
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs