Rob Seaman wrote:
I'm given to wonder how much of the friction on this mailing list is
simply due to the shortcomings in the technology that implements it.
I've appended a message I sent in August with four plots attached. Can
someone tell me whether it is readable now or was successfully
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Ed Davies wrote:
Rob Seaman wrote:
I'm given to wonder how much of the friction on this mailing list is
simply due to the shortcomings in the technology that implements it.
I've appended a message I sent in August with four plots attached. Can
someone tell me
From: Peter Bunclark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:05:00 +
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob,
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Ed Davies wrote:
Rob Seaman wrote:
I'm given to wonder how much of the friction on this mailing list is
On Dec 12, 2006, at 5:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To avoid such failures in the future, Tom Van Baak has agreed to
take over its management and he is now working on the technical
issues involving the migration.
Thanks for looking into that. Thanks to Tom for accepting another
(nearly)
On Tue 2006-12-12T09:18:57 -0400, Richard B. Langley hath writ:
For an overview of some of the legal issues of time see GPS and the Legal
Traceability of Time by Judah Levine in my GPS World Innovation column,
January 2001.
-- Richard Langley
Professor of Geodesy and Precision Navigation
