Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] [17.01] Kernel: bump to 4.4.51

i know it's an old message, i have another router with mediatek processor and it has similar behavior when i enable smart queue management , disabling it the problem is solved Il 25/02/2017 21:02, Stijn Segers ha scritto: So... I have been running on 4.4.51 on a few days now but it looks

Re: [LEDE-DEV] ath9k sta/wpa2 fails on 4.9

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > I've found that ath9k sta mode with wpa2 crypto is failing on lede > master with a 4.9 kernel but if I move back to the 4.4 kernel it > works. I'm testing this on the imx6 target. > > I'm running wpa_supplican't manually

[LEDE-DEV] ath9k sta/wpa2 fails on 4.9

I've found that ath9k sta mode with wpa2 crypto is failing on lede master with a 4.9 kernel but if I move back to the 4.4 kernel it works. I'm testing this on the imx6 target. I'm running wpa_supplican't manually for testing. Here's 4.9: root@LEDE:/# cat << EOF > /var/run/wpa > country=US >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] MT7621: EdgerouterX

It’s because you’re running on a single CPU (and hence have limited interrupt bandwidth) that servicing more buffers per interrupt might get you higher bandwidth. And whether it’s terminating or transit traffic is less significant, though you’ll probably see more increase in transit traffic

Re: [LEDE-DEV] MT7621: EdgerouterX

Until LEDE will work with one CPU, I think changing buffers is irrelevant. But maybe Im wrong. Could you be, please, more specific, what do you mean "wattermarks" and buffers? I think buffer increase helps, if the traffic is for the router. So if I will do test from/to router. But I did test

Re: [LEDE-DEV] MT7621: EdgerouterX

What happens if you allocate more buffers and increase your watermarks but leave the maximum latency the same? > On Mar 30, 2017, at 11:53 AM, Milan Kočvara wrote: > > Hello. > I have 2 Question, please > 1. It is possible to rewrite the driver for MT761 to allow

[LEDE-DEV] MT7621: EdgerouterX

Hello. I have 2 Question, please 1. It is possible to rewrite the driver for MT761 to allow change the MTU greather than 1500? If not, why? Some scenarios need jumboframe enable 2. Edgerouter x with ubiquiti firmware has troughput between 2 routed interfaces with frames 1518B in about

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH LEDE-17.01] ubox: fix sha256 mirror hash

On 2017-03-30 14:25, hauke.mehrt...@intel.com wrote: From: Hauke Mehrtens Commit 5c20a4fec923c3 ("ubox: turn logd into a separate package") changed the PKG_SOURCE_DATE which is also included in the tar file. This change resulted in a new tar with a different hash,

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ubox: fix sha256 mirror hash

From: Hauke Mehrtens Commit 5c20a4fec923c3 ("ubox: turn logd into a separate package") changed the PKG_SOURCE_DATE which is also included in the tar file. This change resulted in a new tar with a different hash, but the sha256 hash was not updated. Fix the sha256 hash

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH LEDE-17.01] odhcpd: fix sha256 sum

From: Hauke Mehrtens The sha256sum added in commit b8567cb44e9e4f ("odhcpd: update to git HEAD version (FS#396)") does not match the sha256sum of the file on the mirror or when I clone it. Update the sha256 sum to the correct value. Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH RFC] owsd: add package for OpenWrt WebSocket Daemon

From: Rafał Miłecki It can be used as an alternative for uhttpd-mod-ubus. It allows accessing ubus using WebSocket API standardized by the W3C. Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki --- Hi, I don't know if there is any interest in this package (and if it should go

Re: [LEDE-DEV] OpenSSL: question about package Makefile

I made some other tests to be sure that removing the make build-shared and make do_linux-shared commands would'n break the compiled shared objects. I checked the md5 for the files compiled with the default package Makefile and the with the simplified one obtaining the same result: Default

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] ar71xx: Add TP-LINK TL-WR841N v12 support.

On 03/30/2017 06:21 AM, Vittorio G (VittGam) wrote: > > Thanks for your suggestion. I knew the exact contrary and in fact I'm > adding dot at end of subject every time... Do you know if there is some > place (that I might have very well missed if it exists...) where this > kind of style rules