Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On 09/10/2017 07:10 PM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: The A8-based devices don't boot (A10/A13), waiting on me to come up with a fix. -w- On Sun, 10 Sep 2017, Lucian CRISTIAN wrote: Is something that blocks these patch sets to go in trunk ? Regards Lucian Hauke, With the splitted configs for

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On Sun, 10 Sep 2017, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: The A8-based devices don't boot (A10/A13), waiting on me to come up with a fix. -w- On Sun, 10 Sep 2017, Lucian CRISTIAN wrote: Is something that blocks these patch sets to go in trunk ? It looks like that CONFIG_ARM_LPAE is the culprit for these

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

The A8-based devices don't boot (A10/A13), waiting on me to come up with a fix. -w- On Sun, 10 Sep 2017, Lucian CRISTIAN wrote: Is something that blocks these patch sets to go in trunk ? Regards Lucian ___ Lede-dev mailing list

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

Is something that blocks these patch sets to go in trunk ? Regards Lucian ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Lucian Cristian wrote: > On 09.08.2017 22:08, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> >> On 08/08/2017 01:13 AM, Lucian Cristian wrote: >>> >>> On 07.08.2017 19:47, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 07.08.2017 19:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > ... >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On 09.08.2017 22:08, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 08/08/2017 01:13 AM, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 07.08.2017 19:47, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 07.08.2017 19:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: ... Hi Lucian, The eMMC version needs an extra device tree file, could you please use this one:

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On 08/08/2017 01:13 AM, Lucian Cristian wrote: > On 07.08.2017 19:47, Lucian Cristian wrote: >> On 07.08.2017 19:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >>> ... >>> Hi Lucian, >>> >>> The eMMC version needs an extra device tree file, could you please use >>> this one: >>>

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On 07.08.2017 19:47, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 07.08.2017 19:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: ... Hi Lucian, The eMMC version needs an extra device tree file, could you please use this one: arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-lime2-emmc.dts We should probably add two device one for the normal

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On 07.08.2017 19:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 08/07/2017 06:13 PM, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 07.08.2017 18:55, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 08/06/2017 08:16 PM, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 04.08.2017 00:37, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This upgrades the target to kernel 4.9 and also adds support for the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On 08/07/2017 06:13 PM, Lucian Cristian wrote: > On 07.08.2017 18:55, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> >> On 08/06/2017 08:16 PM, Lucian Cristian wrote: >>> On 04.08.2017 00:37, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This upgrades the target to kernel 4.9 and also adds support for the Allwinner A64 SoC. This

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On 07.08.2017 18:55, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 08/06/2017 08:16 PM, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 04.08.2017 00:37, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This upgrades the target to kernel 4.9 and also adds support for the Allwinner A64 SoC. This was only tested on the pine64+ and I do not own any older Allwinner

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On 04.08.2017 00:37, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This upgrades the target to kernel 4.9 and also adds support for the Allwinner A64 SoC. This was only tested on the pine64+ and I do not own any older Allwinner SoC. Could someone please test this on an older 32 bit Allwinner SoC and report back some