Me too.
> On May 5, 2018, at 7:36 AM, Paul Spooren wrote:
>
> Are there any updates on this issue? I'd really like to see squasfs 5.0 used
> in OpenWrt!
>
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> On 05/26/2017 06:13 PM, Alexander Couzens
Are there any updates on this issue? I'd really like to see squasfs 5.0
used in OpenWrt!
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Hauke Mehrtens
wrote:
On 05/26/2017 06:13 PM, Alexander Couzens wrote:
squashfs is quite long unmaintained. All patches from major
distributions are
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Alexander Couzens wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 18:03:26 +0200
> Alexander Couzens wrote:
>
>> Hi Phillip,
>>
>> nice to hear you're still there!
>>
>> There was no offense meant in my patch, I just couldn't reach you
>> via email
Hi Phillip,
nice to hear you're still there!
There was no offense meant in my patch, I just couldn't reach you
via email nor did anybody respond to patches for a year on the ml. So my
simple conlusion was there is an orphaned project with is important for
the community. Many distributions use
On 05/26/2017 06:13 PM, Alexander Couzens wrote:
> squashfs is quite long unmaintained. All patches from major
> distributions are integrated.
>include/image.mk | 3 +-
>tools/squashfs4/Makefile | 12 +-
On 05/26/2017 06:13 PM, Alexander Couzens wrote:
> squashfs is quite long unmaintained. All patches from major
> distributions are integrated.
>
>-HOST_BUILD_DIR:=$(BUILD_DIR_HOST)/squashfs$(PKG_VERSION)
>+PKG_SOURCE_PROTO:=git
>+PKG_SOURCE_DATE:=2017-05-25
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Syrone Wong wrote:
> You'd better mention the move to GitHub on the official webpage:
> http://squashfs.sourceforge.net/
>
That GitHub repo is currently the most uptodate repository because
people have made pull requests on that repository.
You'd better mention the move to GitHub on the official webpage:
http://squashfs.sourceforge.net/
Best Regards,
Syrone Wong
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Phillip Lougher
wrote:
> On 05/26/2017 06:13 PM, Alexander Couzens wrote:
>> squashfs is quite long
On 05/26/2017 06:13 PM, Alexander Couzens wrote:
> squashfs is quite long unmaintained. All patches from major
> distributions are integrated.
As the maintainer and author of Squashfs that is completely untrue and
grossly offensive.
Many of those patch-sets are merged (where I have received
On 05/26/2017 06:13 PM, Alexander Couzens wrote:
> squashfs is quite long unmaintained. All patches from major
> distributions are integrated.
> Fixed timestamp is now using the environment SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
> instead of arguments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens
Thanks for
squashfs is quite long unmaintained. All patches from major
distributions are integrated.
Fixed timestamp is now using the environment SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
instead of arguments.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens
---
include/image.mk | 3 +-
11 matches
Mail list logo