On 6 May 2016 at 03:53, Luka Perkov wrote:
>>On 2016-05-05 20:22, mbm wrote:
>>> On 5/5/2016 7:40 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
Many of the changes that we previously tried to introduce were often
squashed by internal disagreements. Resulting discussions often turned
toxic quickly and le
You may be right that OpenWRT is doomed, but we have seen time and time again
that OpenSource software is not a zero-sum game.
Yes, if OpenWRT does nothing, it will struggle, but that's unlikely to be the
case.
For that matter, even with no new manpower, OpenWRT could just copy everything
th
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introducing the LEDE project
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 15:29:47 -0700
From: Bill
To: Daniel Curran-Dickinson
Daniel-
No, of course not - please do.
I assumed, at least for the moment, the folks on LEDE are
Sorry if this hits the list twice, I sent from the wrong email and got
bounced.
On 16-05-04 06:05 PM, Bob Call wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 21:19 +0100, tapper wrote:
>> On 04/05/2016 21:01, mbm wrote:
>>>
>>
[snip]
>
> I'm kind of split on this issue because I run a faltering OpenWRT fork,
> f
On 04/05/2016 21:01, mbm wrote:
Dear OpenWrt community,
It is with a great amount of surprise that, like all of you, we read
about the announcement of the LEDE project yesterday, as there was no
prior announcement nor clues this would happen.
While we recognize the current OpenWrt project suffe
On 4 May 2016 at 23:19, tapper wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 21:01, mbm wrote:
>>
>> Dear OpenWrt community,
>>
>> It is with a great amount of surprise that, like all of you, we read
>> about the announcement of the LEDE project yesterday, as there was no
>> prior announcement nor clues this would happe
