Re: [LEDE-DEV] Fading out PolarSSL

On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 17:32 +0100, Steven Barth wrote: > Hey everyone, > > > > > Currently known remaining users of polarssl are: > > > >  * bmx7 > >  * pianod > >  * shadowsocks-libev-polarssl > >  * shairport-sync-mini > >  * shairport-sync-polarssl > >  * transmission-cli-polarssl > >  *

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Fading out PolarSSL

Hi, I'm in favor of dropping it, don't see anything good in keeping outdated and unsupported libraries. As far as package status goes... shadowsocks-libev --> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/3729 + https://github.com/lede-project/source/pull/657 pianod + shairport-sync* -->

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Fading out PolarSSL

Jo-Philipp Wich writes: > Hi list, > > the mbed TLS project (formerly known as PolarSSL) declared the mbedTLS > 1.3 branch (packaged as "libpolarssl" by LEDE) to be EOL with the end of > the year 2016. [1] > > In order to avoid shipping an outdated and possibly vulnerable SSL >

[LEDE-DEV] Fading out PolarSSL

Hi list, the mbed TLS project (formerly known as PolarSSL) declared the mbedTLS 1.3 branch (packaged as "libpolarssl" by LEDE) to be EOL with the end of the year 2016. [1] In order to avoid shipping an outdated and possibly vulnerable SSL library with the first LEDE release we begun migrating