Hi John,
Am 08.07.2016 um 07:47 schrieb John Crispin:
>
> On 07/07/2016 21:36, Josua Mayer wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Could you please point me at where you merged my 2 patches? I want to
>> ensure I am testing the same code that was causing segfaults.
>>
>> br
>> Josua Mayer
>>
>
> I already
Signed-off-by: Yousong Zhou
---
target/linux/ar71xx/image/generic.mk | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/image/generic.mk
b/target/linux/ar71xx/image/generic.mk
index b8e70a4..561aefd 100644
---
Hi all,
I have several hundred nodes running Openwrt CC with batman-adv and
thought I would start testing LEDE. However, after the build I
noticed you have removed the target profile (i.e. tl-841v11) from the
image file name. For me this is a huge headache. I also noticed you
have uncoupled
From: Ben Greear
This lets one use the CT ath10k driver instead of the built-in
ath10k driver from the upstream kernel (or backports).
This should be a drop-in replacement, as well as enabling
better CT firmware support.
Signed-off-by: Ben Greear
From: Ben Greear
This lets one use the CT ath10k driver instead of the built-in
ath10k driver from the upstream kernel (or backports).
This should be a drop-in replacement, as well as enabling
better CT firmware support.
Signed-off-by: Ben Greear
Reported-by: Syrone Wong
Signed-off-by: Yousong Zhou
---
target/linux/ar71xx/image/generic.mk | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/image/generic.mk
b/target/linux/ar71xx/image/generic.mk
index
Signed-off-by: Yousong Zhou
---
v2 <- v1
- Changed "DEVICE_VARS :=" to "DEVICE_VARS +="
target/linux/ar71xx/image/generic.mk | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/image/generic.mk
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 10:11:16AM +0200, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 08:01:10PM -0700, Craig Miller wrote:
> > Dear Devs,
> >
> > Congratulations on the fork of OpenWRT. I look forward to the new LEDE
> > releases.
> >
> > I am writing here because I am not a committer,
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 08:01:10PM -0700, Craig Miller wrote:
> Dear Devs,
>
> Congratulations on the fork of OpenWRT. I look forward to the new LEDE
> releases.
>
> I am writing here because I am not a committer, but would like to
> communicate with the Devs. I am a professional software
Hi Philipp,
> Yes, good point. But then we should rewrite/redesign the whole update
> process
> including the sysupgrade binary in my opinion. For example writing a
> small library and a daemon
> which does the updates for us. A daemon which executes a sysupgrade tool
> doesn't
> make more sense
Instead of disabling unwinding entirely this upstream patch
just disables generation of async unwind tables.
Once the patch in question lands in stable 4.4 tree this change
essentially must be removed (otherwise patch application will fail).
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin
This reverts commit acd41539d630688e9891003c9b51cace3e113316.
There's a fix in upstream that will at some point land in 4.4 stable as
well so we'll get rid of this hack and with the next commit will apply
upstream fix.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin
---
No changes v1 ->
12 matches
Mail list logo