Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Who among our resident

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: update kernel 4.9 to 4.9.25

Hey, You can also Reject your patch here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/lede/list/ Specifically, this patch is: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/756400/ And [for reference] you can see all patches submitted by you [from your email account]:

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: update kernel 4.9 to 4.9.25

On 2017-05-08 09:36, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: Hey, You can also Reject your patch here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/lede/list/ Specifically, this patch is: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/756400/ And [for reference] you can see all patches submitted by you [from your email

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: update kernel 4.9 to 4.9.25

Dear, Please cancel this patch Since this was submitted: - 4.9.27 already arrived - Some other kernel patches have been submitted or got staged after this patch was created Logically, this one will now not apply anymore. Koen On 2017-04-28 15:17, Koen Vandeputte wrote: - Refresh all

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: update kernel 4.9 to 4.9.27

- Refresh all patches - Removed upstreamed - Adapted 1 Compile tested on: bcm53xx, cns3xxx, imx6 Run tested on: cns3xxx & imx6 Signed-off-by: Koen Vandeputte --- include/kernel-version.mk | 4 +-

Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

Hi, On Mon, 8 May 2017, Daniel Engberg wrote: Trac: Is it really worth keeping trac at all? What value does it add? Just display a page explaining that it's shutdown and forward to OpenWrt? There is a lot of "added value" in the tickets submitted throughout the years, either as comments,

Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

I think it is a great news that openwrt/lede governance is merging back together. I was really worried. There is not that many of you that can run a complex project like that. >From my side what matters is to be able to take the last release and build it from source for my use. I found lede 17

Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 2017-05-08 15:43, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: John Crispin writes: Hi, Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to propose and have people vote on. Great to

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ipq806x: Add nand boot support for ipq40xx AP-DK04.1-C1

Hi Christian, >Hello, On Saturday, May 06, 2017 11:24 PM Christian Lamparter wrote: >On Friday, May 5, 2017 9:19:36 PM CEST Ram Chandra Jangir wrote: > This change add nand boot support for IPQ40xx based > AP-DK04.1-C1 board using ubi image, also add sysupgrage support for > AP-DK04.1-C1 and

Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

> Op 8 mei 2017, om 15:19 heeft John Crispin het volgende > geschreven: > > Hi, > > Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and > discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would > like to propose and have people vote

Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

2017-05-08 15:43 GMT+02:00 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen : > John Crispin writes: > >> Hi, >> >> Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and >> discussed >> the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to >> propose >>

[LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

Hi, Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to propose and have people vote on. *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor) majority voted for

Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 15:19 +0200, John Crispin wrote: > > *) mailing list > - ask david to add the openwrt-adm and openwrt lists > - announce the switch to the infradead serves, asking people to  > unsubscribe if they have privacy issues with this > - import the user DB from the current openwrt

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH netifd] bridge: reset primary only after marking the member not present

Run the bridge_reset_primary function only after the member being removed has been marked as not present. This change prevents the bridge_reset_primary function from choosing the member being removed as the new primary member. Signed-off-by: Alex Oprea --- bridge.c | 6

Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

John Crispin writes: > Hi, > > Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and > discussed > the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to > propose > and have people vote on. Great to hear progress is being made on this! I

Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 08/05/17 15:29, David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 15:19 +0200, John Crispin wrote: *) mailing list - ask david to add the openwrt-adm and openwrt lists - announce the switch to the infradead serves, asking people to unsubscribe if they have privacy issues with this - import the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 09:19:42PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 8 May 2017, Daniel Engberg wrote: > > > Trac: > > Is it really worth keeping trac at all? What value does it add? Just > > display a page explaining that it's shutdown and forward to OpenWrt? > > There is a lot of

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] fritz_tffs_read: fix parsing of size argument

The parameter specification missed that -s takes an argument. Signed-off-by: Valentin Spreckels --- package/utils/fritz-tools/src/fritz_tffs_read.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] lantiq: dsl_notify: also restart pppoe interfaces

Signed-off-by: Valentin Spreckels --- target/linux/lantiq/base-files/sbin/dsl_notify.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/sbin/dsl_notify.sh

Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

Glad to hear the merge is coming and that enough issues were resolved to make this go forward. So ... I'll just throw my thoughts into the hopper. > On 05/08/2017 09:19 AM, John Crispin wrote: > > *) branding > From a raw objective stand, OpenWrt has better market value as a brand. Its