On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 09:19:42PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 8 May 2017, Daniel Engberg wrote:
> 
> > Trac:
> > Is it really worth keeping trac at all? What value does it add? Just
> > display a page explaining that it's shutdown and forward to OpenWrt?
> 
> There is a lot of "added value" in the tickets submitted throughout the
> years, either as comments, notes, fixes or just the issue being raised, so
> it's a good idea to keep it for archiving purposes. Older devices do die,
> but every year or so I come across shops selling brand new WRT54G (really),
> so keeping the knowledge base in an unsorted form (compared to a wiki) to
> the users can be useful. Whether that's a staticized archive or running the
> trac engine itself is another question.

I agree that there are a lot of references to dev.openwrt.org which
should remain intact. A non-interactive version would imho be
sufficient, tickets which are actually still relevant should be
re-opened on bugs.lede-project.org (which will become bugs.openwrt.org)
A grace period of 1 month starting from the notification until the
service is being shutdown (or archived read-only) would also be nice.

> 
> Other than that, I very much welcome the groundwork for the planned merge -
> thanks John, Imre and Felix for putting it together.

I agree. Thanks a lot for all the work done, this is great progress!


Cheers


Daniel

_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Reply via email to