On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 09:19:42PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 8 May 2017, Daniel Engberg wrote: > > > Trac: > > Is it really worth keeping trac at all? What value does it add? Just > > display a page explaining that it's shutdown and forward to OpenWrt? > > There is a lot of "added value" in the tickets submitted throughout the > years, either as comments, notes, fixes or just the issue being raised, so > it's a good idea to keep it for archiving purposes. Older devices do die, > but every year or so I come across shops selling brand new WRT54G (really), > so keeping the knowledge base in an unsorted form (compared to a wiki) to > the users can be useful. Whether that's a staticized archive or running the > trac engine itself is another question.
I agree that there are a lot of references to dev.openwrt.org which should remain intact. A non-interactive version would imho be sufficient, tickets which are actually still relevant should be re-opened on bugs.lede-project.org (which will become bugs.openwrt.org) A grace period of 1 month starting from the notification until the service is being shutdown (or archived read-only) would also be nice. > > Other than that, I very much welcome the groundwork for the planned merge - > thanks John, Imre and Felix for putting it together. I agree. Thanks a lot for all the work done, this is great progress! Cheers Daniel _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev