Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] Add some common packages for x86-64 target.

2016-06-01 Thread Adrian Panella
I agree with having somehow a full build available for new users. Now that "market" seems to be catered by custom images published by some in the Owrt forum and consumed by many who want a better router firmware but don't know how to build it, and most probably don't even want to know or take

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] Add some common packages for x86-64 target.

2016-06-01 Thread John Crispin
On 01/06/2016 20:24, Dave Taht wrote: > To fork this discussion mildly, I would like to see a fuller build, > including the luci gui, available, somehow, somewhere, so that newer > users can get a working config "out of the box" from the daily builds. > > Also, at least on the archer c7v2, the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] Add some common packages for x86-64 target.

2016-06-01 Thread Dave Taht
To fork this discussion mildly, I would like to see a fuller build, including the luci gui, available, somehow, somewhere, so that newer users can get a working config "out of the box" from the daily builds. Also, at least on the archer c7v2, the ath10k kmod and firmware were not included in the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] Add some common packages for x86-64 target.

2016-06-01 Thread John Crispin
Hi Ben, i am inclined to reject this one. i understand the reasoning behind the patch but the general concept is to keep images minimal. the tools might make sense to you for your use case but others will want a different selection of tools/drivers. we will never be able to find a set suitable

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] Add some common packages for x86-64 target.

2016-05-30 Thread Ben Greear
On 05/26/2016 07:05 PM, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 16:57 -0700, gree...@candelatech.com wrote: From: Ben Greear This should make x86-64 targets more useable out of the box. The assumption is that most x86-64 users have adequate

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] Add some common packages for x86-64 target.

2016-05-30 Thread W. Michael Petullo
>> This should make x86-64 targets more useable out of the box. >> The assumption is that most x86-64 users have adequate storage, >> and those that do not can still config away the options they >> do not need. > Although I agree x86-64 is normally big, I'm not sure that it makes > sense to make

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] Add some common packages for x86-64 target.

2016-05-30 Thread Daniel Curran-Dickinson
Hi, On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 16:57 -0700, gree...@candelatech.com wrote: > From: Ben Greear > > This should make x86-64 targets more useable out of the box. > The assumption is that most x86-64 users have adequate storage, > and those that do not can still config away