Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC 3/3] config: ext4: use 1K blocks by default to support online resize2fs

2016-10-18 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 10/17/2016 11:25 PM, Michael Heimpold wrote: > In general, I'm fine with larger default partition size. However, this results > in large images available for download at downloads.lede-project.org... > > mhei Not necessarily, if the disk image filesystem's free space is zeroed (a guide

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC 3/3] config: ext4: use 1K blocks by default to support online resize2fs

2016-10-17 Thread Michael Heimpold
Hi, Am Montag, 17. Oktober 2016, 22:08:06 CEST schrieb Jo-Philipp Wich: > Hi Michael, > > > I can't see why adjusting the default partition size would have been > > necessary > > as genext2fs takes (or better: took) the following parameters: > The filesystem is generated okay but due to the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC 3/3] config: ext4: use 1K blocks by default to support online resize2fs

2016-10-17 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi Michael, > I can't see why adjusting the default partition size would have been necessary > as genext2fs takes (or better: took) the following parameters: The filesystem is generated okay but due to the total size : blocksize ratio there are not enough backup block group descriptor entries

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC 3/3] config: ext4: use 1K blocks by default to support online resize2fs

2016-10-17 Thread Michael Heimpold
Hi, Am Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2016, 01:59:44 CEST schrieb Jo-Philipp Wich: > Commit fe20272ab16068765a191f3a846f30f977bc7669 (SVN r40924) introduced > support for specifying ext4 blocksizes but silently switched the implicit > 1K value to 4K by default without also adjusting the default partition