Hello Martin,
thank you for your test report and opinion on the versioning.
I'm glad to hear that all of the official and your personal test pass.
Cheers,
Alexis
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ledger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
Hi John,
apologies if my mail came across the wrong way. It was written with
the notion that I myself could do more to help
Hello Juergen,
thanks for the report and taking the time to test the latest changes.
The boost build warnings you mentioned (and that I see also)
are a boost issue (see https://github.com/boostorg/iostreams/pull/24).
Cheers,
Alexis
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed
> Alexis writes:
> Apologies if my mail came across the wrong way. It was written with the
> notion that I myself could do more to help improve ledger and move it
> forward.
No worries, Alexis!
> Off-topic question: Did you attend http://conf.nixos.org ? Too bad I
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 02:01:05PM +0100, Alexis wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> a while ago I wanted to publish a new ledger release, but didn't
> (and I'd rather not have you asking why ;)
>
> Ledger's bitrot is becoming more and more of a problem (especially with
> newer boost versions, namely
* John Wiegley [2016-01-02 09:02]:
> Why would it be named 3.2? Does it have any new features or change any APIs?
> 3.1.1 sounds like the correct number to me.
There's at least the new --no-revalued option and support for newer
Boost. See doc/NEWS for a (probably
* Alexis [2016-01-02 14:01]:
> To test ledger please:
I'm on Debian 8.2 with boost 1.55.0.2. All ledger tests pass.
Furthermore, the test suite of my personal finance system going back
to 2008 passes.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
---
You received
> Alexis writes:
> Ledger's bitrot is becoming more and more of a problem (especially with
> newer boost versions, namely 1.58, 1.59, and 1.60) so I think a new release
> is quite necessary.
Ledger's development proceeds at the pace of my needs -- since we don't have