Re: Change in core terminology

2009-02-24 Thread Vinod Kurup
I think it's good to standardize terminology. I, however, am clueless about standard terminology and ledger terminology. (Ledger has been so easy to use that I haven't read the manual in a long time). Is this the correct *new* terminology? 2009/02/24 Gasoline Station

Re: Change in core terminology

2009-02-24 Thread Vinod Kurup
Ouch, that came out looking horrible... so much for my ASCII skills. I found the answer at the wiki, where I should have looked first. http://wiki.github.com/jwiegley/ledger/terminology

Re: Change in core terminology

2009-02-24 Thread John Wiegley
On Feb 24, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Vinod Kurup wrote: I think it's good to standardize terminology. I, however, am clueless about standard terminology and ledger terminology. (Ledger has been so easy to use that I haven't read the manual in a long time). Is this the correct *new* terminology?

Change in core terminology

2009-02-23 Thread John Wiegley
Martin Blais pointed out to me a while back that some of Ledger's naming choices are at odds with standard accounting terminology, most pointedly my use of the word transaction. Therefore, today I checked in the following global name change in 3.0: To better follow naming standards used

Re: Change in core terminology

2009-02-23 Thread Simon Michael
John Wiegley wrote: Martin Blais pointed out to me a while back that some of Ledger's naming choices are at odds with standard accounting terminology, most pointedly my use of the word transaction. Therefore, today I checked in the following global name change in 3.0: To better follow