On 3/9/12 4:56 AM, Doug Philips wrote:
I'm sorry to say that I've been unable to follow all the responses to
this as closely as I would have liked, and perhaps I missed some, was
there any decision taken re: the various branch suggestions, etc?
Thanks Doug. Current status is good:
- we have
Simon Michael simon-jbxitmbj2llqt0dzr+a...@public.gmane.org writes:
Moving it, perhaps preserving history, requires a bit of git-fu.
That type of moving I've done many times. If you're amenable, I already know
the git-fu. It will basically be just like having two repos in a single
On 3/9/12 7:16 PM, John Wiegley wrote:
That type of moving I've done many times. If you're amenable, I already know
the git-fu. It will basically be just like having two repos in a single
repository: they will just be differentiated by branch name rather than by
clone URL.
If you feel it's
