Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB v1.4.32-1 on apt.ledgersmb.org

2016-08-12 Thread Chris Travers
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Robert J. Clay wrote: > All, > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Robert J. Clay wrote: >> >> The v1.4.32 version of LedgerSMB (1.4.32+ds-1) has been uploaded to >> Debian and has already transitioned to Ubuntu for their next release >> ('Yakkety'). Barring any

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Sales Invoice

2016-08-11 Thread Bob Crandell
So far we use Sales Invoices but the Timecards look interesting. Unless I don't understand your "date or quantity" question the answer is both. First we bill time and product sales separately. Products are billed the day they are picked up or delivered. Consulting time for a given customer is

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Sales Invoice

2016-08-11 Thread Bob Crandell
>>> Chris Travers 8/10/2016 8:07 PM >>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Bob Crandell wrote: Hi David, I'm trying move this thread to the developers. If it works I'll throw some Timecard ideas at you. I am working on the Timecard and I can't get it to work. When I enter "Labor", a service

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Sales Invoice

2016-08-10 Thread Chris Travers
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Bob Crandell wrote: > Hi David, > > I'm trying move this thread to the developers. If it works I'll throw > some Timecard ideas at you. > > I am working on the Timecard and I can't get it to work. When I enter > "Labor", a service or "MBB150", a part both valid

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Sales Invoice

2016-08-10 Thread Chris Travers
Hi; Can you please describe your workflow. It sounds like we need to make some fields required for initial entry that are not. Are you entering by date or quantity? Best Wishes, Chris Travers On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Bob Crandell wrote: > Hi David, > > I'm trying move this thread to

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Sales Invoice

2016-08-10 Thread Bob Crandell
Hi David, I'm trying move this thread to the developers. If it works I'll throw some Timecard ideas at you. I am working on the Timecard and I can't get it to work. When I enter "Labor", a service or "MBB150", a part both valid I get: Attribute (qty) is required at constructor LedgerSMB::Time

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Major Problem on Forum fixed

2016-05-17 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Chris, Sorry for the late follow-up. On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Chris Bennett wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 10:01:47AM +0200, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > When requesting my password be sent to me (I think I have an account), I > > get an internal server error, just a

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Major Problem on Forum fixed

2016-05-14 Thread Chris Bennett
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 10:01:47AM +0200, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Chris, > > When requesting my password be sent to me (I think I have an account), I > get an internal server error, just a few minutes ago -- and a reference to > the contact page. > I found that problem. Very subtle little err

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Major Problem on Forum fixed

2016-05-14 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Chris, When requesting my password be sent to me (I think I have an account), I get an internal server error, just a few minutes ago -- and a reference to the contact page. Regards, Erik. On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Chris Bennett wrote: > Mailing list messages have not been getting po

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Preliminary Debian package for LedgerSMB v1.4.20

2015-12-19 Thread Pongrácz István
Hi, Robert, thank you very much for your great work, I just tested the deb package to install lsmb 1.4.20 into linuxmint 17.2 XFCE edition. Basically it went smooth. I also installed some packages from the recommended packages. Anyway, I tried to change the css, but it seems it not changed a

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Failed setup due to missing path

2015-09-11 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Joe, Thanks for reporting (I had to dig your mail out of my spam box, due to GMail failing to validate if it was sent by Yahoo's mail servers, hence my somewhat late answer). On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Joe Hunt wrote: > I've been trying to install LedgerSMB 1.4.15 on Slackware Linux. >

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Pennies

2015-08-14 Thread Bob Crandell
Hi Guys, For us, all sales documents of any kind contain only whole dollars. Internal reports ( COGS, P&E, and such), purchasing, etc. should have the accurate cost to the penny. Thanks Bob >>> Erik Huelsmann 8/9/2015 3:00 AM >>> Hi Jigme, Bob, In the Netherlands we haven't had cents (0.01

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Pennies

2015-08-09 Thread Jigme Datse Yli-Rasku
On 15/08/09 03:00 , Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Jigme, Bob, > > In the Netherlands we haven't had cents (0.01 EUR) in cash payments for > a looong time (although some other EUR countries do). So, I'm > sympathetic with your question. > > However, it does raise some other questions: > > 1. What happe

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Pennies

2015-08-09 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Jigme, Bob, In the Netherlands we haven't had cents (0.01 EUR) in cash payments for a looong time (although some other EUR countries do). So, I'm sympathetic with your question. However, it does raise some other questions: 1. What happens if you send your invoice to your customers and they pa

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Pennies

2015-08-09 Thread Jigme Datse Yli-Rasku
This is of interest to me here in Canada. In Canada (and in Australia I think) there is no penny any more. The issue that commonly comes up for some businesses is no matter how carefully you set your prices, unless you do a "tax included" setting of prices, you risk that things will not balance o

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB 1.4.13 released, not on Sourceforge yet

2015-08-08 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Bill, Just uploaded 1.4.13.1 which has the version number corrected (to 1.4.13.1, that is). Regards, Erik. On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Bill Appelbe wrote: > Hi > note that the version number on this is still 1.4.12 > > Bill > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Chris Travers > wrote:

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB 1.4.13 released, not on Sourceforge yet

2015-07-22 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Bill, Thanks for the heads up! Please note that I updated the tag to a version which *does* have the version number updates before the release notification was sent out (but not picked up by the tarballs). Regards, Erik. On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Bill Appelbe wrote: > Hi > note t

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB 1.4.13 released, not on Sourceforge yet

2015-07-22 Thread Bill Appelbe
Hi note that the version number on this is still 1.4.12 Bill On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > Hi; > > I have released 1.4.13. This release includes a number of important > improvements including adding back GIFI income statements, a few issues with > adding/editing accoun

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-smb-devel Digest, Vol 93, Issue 15

2014-09-20 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi David, On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:51 PM, David Mora wrote: > Hi, its been a long time but one of the requirements we have is to support > per line or if it is not possible leger note traceability. > Thanks for your reaction and input! However, due to the fact that you're responding to the dig

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-smb-devel Digest, Vol 93, Issue 15

2014-09-20 Thread David Mora
Hi, its been a long time but one of the requirements we have is to support per line or if it is not possible leger note traceability. Not sure if by journal you mean the ledger journal or something else tough, so i send apologies if this is not the thread to send this ingormation. Regards > E

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[6698] trunk/sql/modules/arap.sql

2014-01-28 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Just noticed I'm reading out-of-order and that that's part of my missing context, although the immediate question remains. Regards, Erik. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Herman, > > Just noticed this commit (I'm trying to review all commits, not just > yours, it's

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[6698] trunk/sql/modules/arap.sql

2014-01-28 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Herman, Just noticed this commit (I'm trying to review all commits, not just yours, it's just that this one drew my attention in particular): On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:08 PM, wrote: > Revision: 6698 > http://sourceforge.net/p/ledger-smb/code/6698 > Author: tshvr > Date: 2014-

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB 1.3.x and Apache v2.4?

2014-01-18 Thread Robert J. Clay
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Chris Travers wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Robert J. Clay wrote: >>Variations on not having access to the files, or not >> recognizing/accepting the URL. > > > Ok. Here's what I found when I was installing on Debian Testing: > > 1. Not accept

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB 1.3.x and Apache v2.4?

2014-01-16 Thread Chris Travers
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Robert J. Clay wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Chris Travers > wrote: > > Moving this to the -devel list. > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Robert J. Clay > wrote: > >> > >>As I've not yet been able to get a working v2.4 compatible > >> ledgersm

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB 1.3.x and Apache v2.4?

2014-01-16 Thread Robert J. Clay
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > Moving this to the -devel list. > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Robert J. Clay wrote: >> >>As I've not yet been able to get a working v2.4 compatible >> ledgersmb httpd config file; I don't know if such a file was enabled, >> if that

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB 1.3.x and Apache v2.4?

2014-01-16 Thread Chris Travers
Moving this to the -devel list. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Robert J. Clay wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Robert J. Clay wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Chris Travers > wrote: > >> Speaking of which, anything I can do to help with the Apache 2.4 issues? > > > >Wel

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB 1.3.x and Apache v2.4?

2014-01-09 Thread Pongrácz István
eredeti üzenet- Feladó: "Robert J. Clay" [email protected] Címzett: [email protected], "Development discussion for LedgerSMB" [email protected] Dátum: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 03:57:21 -0500 -

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Online Translation system for 1.3 and 1.4

2013-08-09 Thread Pongrácz István
Hi, Ledgersmb.org relation: You should put the link to here, if you think it is valuable for the community. Yes, this system uses Pootle in Bitnami stack. I had to hack a little to get it work as expected, but seems working for a long time now. Regarding the contribution as translator,

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Online Translation system for 1.3 and 1.4

2013-08-09 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Istvan, > For those, who would like to translate the system, here is a translation system, running on one of my servers: > > http://translate.startit.hu/pootle > > I use it personally for translating to Hungarian and provide a central portal for translation efforts for existing and future users

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] How to extend LedgerSMB programmatically

2013-07-25 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Brian, On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Brian Wolf wrote: > How to extend LedgerSMB programmatically > My experience in developing an extension to LedgerSMB > Brian Wolf > Activus Technologies > > Thanks for your write-up ! Sure hope others find it useful and use it to extend LedgerSMB into

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] menu

2013-05-28 Thread Chris Travers
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Should we add the technical "how to" you documented below somewhere on the > ledgersmb.org site, or maybe in docs in the development tree? > Maybe in the community guide? Best Wishes, Chris Travers > > Bye, > > > Erik. > >

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] menu

2013-05-28 Thread Chris Travers
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Brian Wolf wrote: > Excellent information. > I've created a new table, where one of the columns is the user_id, which > would be passed in to the function. > Something like > select * from my_new_table where user_id = ? > First of all, I would avoid passing in a

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] menu

2013-05-28 Thread Brian Wolf
The following seems to "almost" work.  The function returns two columns: id (int) and options (text). $menu->{'favorites'} = $menu->exec_method(funcname => 'custom_menu_favorites'); I thought this would work in the template, but nothing is disp

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] menu

2013-05-28 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Chris, Should we add the technical "how to" you documented below somewhere on the ledgersmb.org site, or maybe in docs in the development tree? Bye, Erik. On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > Can you be more specific? > > The general Perl object you probably want to use

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] menu

2013-05-28 Thread Brian Wolf
Excellent information. I've created a new table, where one of the columns is the user_id, which would be passed in to the function. Something like select * from my_new_table where user_id = ? Thanks. Brian

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] menu

2013-05-27 Thread Chris Travers
Can you be more specific? The general Perl object you probably want to use is LedgerSMB::DBObject::Menu and since this inherits from LedgerSMB::DBObject, the simplest way to do this is to create a user defined function in PostgreSQL. From there it is very straight-forward to pull that data into L

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[5452] trunk

2013-01-01 Thread Chris Travers
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Chris, > > > At the bottom of this mail you grant explicitly to the postgres user. > Should that not be the database owner? In my case the database owner isn't > postgres. > Yeah. we should probably delete that. Maybe I can dump withou

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[5452] trunk

2013-01-01 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Chris, At the bottom of this mail you grant explicitly to the postgres user. Should that not be the database owner? In my case the database owner isn't postgres. Bye, Erik. On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:59 AM, wrote: > Revision: 5452 > > http://ledger-smb.svn.sourceforge.net/ledger-smb/?r

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Add field to parts

2012-07-23 Thread Chris Travers
Hmmm I just checked something and there may be an easier way to do this for 1.3/1.4. When we redo the parts bit this may be different. >> Unfortunately, the bit you're trying to change is located in "old code": > code that's still inherited from SQL Ledger, which means you probably need > a few

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Add field to parts

2012-07-23 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Brian, This mail is going through the -devel@ mailing list as that's the appropriate forum to discuss changes to the LedgerSMB software - just letting you know. On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Brian Wolf wrote: > Everyone: > > I'd like to add a field to the parts table and display it when

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] 1.2 -> 1.3 API differences

2012-04-22 Thread M Lubratt
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:47 AM, M Lubratt wrote: > > Good morning! > > > > I've been running 1.2.x for a while now and I've developed a program that > > interfaces to it through web POSTs and GETs. I'm looking at > transitioning > > to 1.3.x

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] ledger-smb:[4639] addons/1.3

2012-04-10 Thread Chris Travers
I have added very basic documentation to the addons directory as README. It includes installation documentation generally for addons. Best Wishes, Chris Travers -- Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it come

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] ledger-smb:[4639] addons/1.3

2012-04-10 Thread Chris Bennett
Speaking of customer details. This is how I have found myself needing to break things down. I break my customer table down into the following fields. One common difference I see here in Texas is whether or not a customer is a residential or commercial customer. The sales tax laws here are differen

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] ledger-smb:[4639] addons/1.3

2012-04-10 Thread Chris Travers
I will try to put something together on this tonight. Best Wishes, Chris Travers -- Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app mo

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] ledger-smb:[4639] addons/1.3

2012-04-10 Thread Håvard Sørli
On 09. april 2012 08:35, [email protected] wrote: > Revision: 4639 >http://ledger-smb.svn.sourceforge.net/ledger-smb/?rev=4639&view=rev > Author: einhverfr > Date: 2012-04-09 06:35:51 + (Mon, 09 Apr 2012) > Log Message: > --- > Extension for storing pers

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[4485] branches/1.3/bin

2012-03-16 Thread Chris Travers
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Chris, > > How about abstracting these tests into a generic method in the > LedgerSMB::Template module: format_available($) which takes the format > string as its argument and returns true or not? > > The implementation can be as easy as:

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[4485] branches/1.3/bin

2012-03-16 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Chris, How about abstracting these tests into a generic method in the LedgerSMB::Template module: format_available($) which takes the format string as its argument and returns true or not? The implementation can be as easy as: sub format_available { my ($format) = @_; return ! eval { re

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-smb-devel Digest, Vol 62, Issue 14

2012-02-21 Thread Hilton Day
> -- Forwarded message -- > From: Chris Travers > To: Development discussion for LedgerSMB > > Cc: > Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 06:29:22 -0800 > Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] possible bug in RPM build process? > Hi Hilton; > > I have committed this change. > > Would you like your e

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Announcing LedgerSMB 1.3.10 - RPM install - next + attachment

2012-02-14 Thread Philip Rhoades
On 2012-02-15 01:04, Philip Rhoades wrote: Chris, On 2012-02-15 00:53, Chris Travers wrote: Get the postgresql-contrib rpm. Just note, this isnt starting over.  You are just reloading the database structures. I realise that but atfer messing around with stuff for a while I prefer to start

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Announcing LedgerSMB 1.3.10 - RPM install - next . .

2012-02-14 Thread Philip Rhoades
Chris, On 2012-02-15 00:53, Chris Travers wrote: > Get the postgresql-contrib rpm. > > Just note, this isnt starting over.  You are just reloading the > database structures. I realise that but atfer messing around with stuff for a while I prefer to start from scratch so that I can be sure what

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Announcing LedgerSMB 1.3.10 - RPM install - next . .

2012-02-14 Thread Chris Travers
Get the postgresql-contrib rpm. Just note, this isn't starting over. You are just reloading the database structures. Best Wishes, Chris Travers -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensi

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Announcing LedgerSMB 1.3.10 - RPM install - next . .

2012-02-14 Thread Philip Rhoades
Chris, On 2012-02-14 19:18, Chris Travers wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Philip Rhoades [1]> wrote: > >> Chris, >> >> On 2012-02-14 17:33, Chris Travers wrote: >> > Also >> > >> > df check_expiration > > try > df batch_create > > And if this also shows 0 rows, try rebuilding your dat

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Announcing LedgerSMB 1.3.10 - RPM install - next . .

2012-02-14 Thread Chris Travers
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: > Chris, > > > On 2012-02-14 17:33, Chris Travers wrote: > > Also > > > > df check_expiration > > > try \df batch_create And if this also shows 0 rows, try rebuilding your database using the setup.pl. Best wishes, Chris Travers ---

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Announcing LedgerSMB 1.3.10 - RPM install - next . .

2012-02-14 Thread Philip Rhoades
Chris, On 2012-02-14 17:33, Chris Travers wrote: > Also > > df check_expiration "List if functions" shows zero rows . . Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: [email protected] ---

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Announcing LedgerSMB 1.3.10 - RPM install - next . .

2012-02-13 Thread Chris Travers
Also \df check_expiration -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, M

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Announcing LedgerSMB 1.3.10 - RPM install - next . .

2012-02-13 Thread Philip Rhoades
Chris, On 2012-02-14 16:01, Chris Travers wrote: > By that I mean: > > select value from defaults where setting_key = version; gives: 1.3.10 - it should correspond to the version of the RPM right? (I have gone back to my virtual i686 setup again). Thanks, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO B

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Announcing LedgerSMB 1.3.10 - RPM install - next . .

2012-02-13 Thread Chris Travers
By that I mean: select value from defaults where setting_key = 'version'; -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visu

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Announcing LedgerSMB 1.3.10 - RPM install - next . .

2012-02-13 Thread Chris Travers
What version is your database? Best Wishes, Chris Travers On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote: > Chris, > > > On 2012-02-08 23:06, Philip Rhoades wrote: > > Chris, > > ledgersmb RPM - after commenting out the line: > > > >cpan Module::Install > > > > in the "install.sh" fi

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Announcing LedgerSMB 1.3.10 - RPM install - next . .

2012-02-13 Thread Philip Rhoades
Chris, On 2012-02-08 23:06, Philip Rhoades wrote: > Chris, > ledgersmb RPM - after commenting out the line: > >cpan Module::Install > > in the "install.sh" file and manually installing for errors for the > three Test modules, I still get: > > Installing Perl Modules > include /usr/share/ledge

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[4249] branches/1.3/LedgerSMB/AA.pm

2012-01-07 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Chris, After testing more, I found that the rounding issue only affected AR+AP /transactions/ -- ie not invoices. Further more, the commenting out below works well: amounts in local currency can't be entered into the system with higher precision than 2 digits (cents) while foreign currency amo

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] LSMB 1.3.5 and PostgreSQL 9.1

2011-11-29 Thread Chris Travers
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: > Chris Travers wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Roderick A. Anderson >> wrote: >> >>> Remember that this is from the prepare-company-database.sh script and >>> maybe I didn't make it clear that this is a fresh install.  Not a

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] LSMB 1.3.5 and PostgreSQL 9.1

2011-11-28 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
Chris Travers wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Roderick A. Anderson > wrote: > >> Remember that this is from the prepare-company-database.sh script and >> maybe I didn't make it clear that this is a fresh install. Not an upgrade. > > Bug report filed Thanks. There is still an issue i

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Significant backup routine bug found in 1.3.x

2011-11-25 Thread David A. Bandel
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:19, Chris Travers wrote: > Hi all; > > For all of you using LedgerSMB 1.3 in production, please note that the > backup routines that come as part of LedgerSMB were apparently broken > by a number of framework changes between 1.2 and 1.3.  They currently > do not produce

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[3942] tags/1.3.2/sql/coa/no/chart/General.sql

2011-10-30 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Sorry!! I'll revert and commit to the branch instead! Bye, Erik. On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:18 PM, wrote: > Revision: 3942 >          http://ledger-smb.svn.sourceforge.net/ledger-smb/?rev=3942&view=rev > Author:   ehuelsmann > Date:     2011-10-30 21:18:22 + (Sun, 30 Oct 2011) > Log Messa

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-smb-devel Digest, Vol 58, Issue 21

2011-10-29 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Hugh, Thanks for your response pointing us to existing work - and for starting this work. I saw your work is from 2009. Did you work against 1.3 in a newer (maybe unpublished) version? > Yes, that would be me, please. > Two some years ago I did some preliminary work on: > http://search.cpan.o

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-smb-devel Digest, Vol 58, Issue 21

2011-10-25 Thread Hugh Esco
John: Yes, that would be me, please. Two some years ago I did some preliminary work on: http://search.cpan.org/~hesco/LedgerSMB-API-0.04a/lib/LedgerSMB/API.pm And have experience writing RESTful interfaces using Application::REST, I think it is. Please include me in further discussions on

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] ledger-smb 1.3 UI utf-8 multi-byte characters e.g. french accented characters as éçà etc

2011-10-04 Thread herman vierendeels
thanks, It would be an honour to me. email-address does not need to be changed. thanks also for clarifying provenance of sub escapeHTML Herman 2011/10/4 Chris Travers : > Committed in svn 3794. > > Would you like your name in the CONTRIBUTORS file?  If so would you > like your email address sl

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] ledger-smb 1.3 UI utf-8 multi-byte characters e.g. french accented characters as éçà etc

2011-10-04 Thread Chris Travers
Committed in svn 3794. Would you like your name in the CONTRIBUTORS file? If so would you like your email address slightly obscured or redacted? Best Wishes, Chris Travers -- All the data continuously generated in your

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] ledger-smb 1.3 UI utf-8 multi-byte characters e.g. french accented characters as éçà etc

2011-10-04 Thread herman vierendeels
I have found a better solution. In LedgerSMB/Template/HTML.pm By adding ENCODING => 'UTF-8' parameter when creating new Template, we arrive at the same result! $template = Template->new({ INCLUDE_PATH => [$parent->{include_path}, 'UI/lib'], START_TAG => quotemeta

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] ledger-smb 1.3 UI utf-8 multi-byte characters e.g. french accented characters as éçà etc

2011-10-03 Thread herman vierendeels
Hello Chris, Yes, i am talking about html-templates. Until now, i have not found any html-template with multi-byte characters in ledgersmb. But in the future, multi-byte characters might turn up into the html-templates for one reason or another. So we might better be prepared. I stumbled upon thi

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] ledger-smb 1.3 UI utf-8 multi-byte characters e.g. french accented characters as éçà etc

2011-10-03 Thread Chris Travers
Hi Herman; On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:50 AM, herman vierendeels wrote: > I would like to share my experience concerning the display of > multi-byte utf-8 characters. > > I was trying to adapt  UI/login.html to my needs with french accented > characters. > But 3 multi-bytes (e.g. éèà) where displaly

[Ledger-smb-devel] ledger-smb 1.3 UI utf-8 multi-byte characters e.g. french accented characters as éçà etc

2011-10-03 Thread herman vierendeels
I would like to share my experience concerning the display of multi-byte utf-8 characters. I was trying to adapt UI/login.html to my needs with french accented characters. But 3 multi-bytes (e.g. éèà) where displalyed as 6 individual characters . the bottom-line is that html-files , like UI/logi

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[3656] trunk/sql/modules

2011-08-16 Thread Chris Travers
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Chris, > Is the commit below missing an sql/upgrade/ equivalent? I havent been putting the grants in sql/upgrade because that requires preprocessing and the capacity for error is kinda high. Best thing to do is preprocess the Roles agai

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[3656] trunk/sql/modules

2011-08-16 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Chris, Is the commit below missing an sql/upgrade/ equivalent? Bye, Erik. On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:19 AM, wrote: > Revision: 3656 > > http://ledger-smb.svn.sourceforge.net/ledger-smb/?rev=3656&view=rev > Author: einhverfr > Date: 2011-08-15 23:19:51 + (Mon, 15 Aug 2011) > > Log

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] New 1.3 snapshot available

2011-08-01 Thread Erik Huelsmann
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > Hi all; > > We have released a new snapshot, available at > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/ledger-smb/files/Development%20Snapshots/1.3-snapshot20110631/ > > This snapshot has known bugs, but it also fixes issues in the areas of: > 1) Use

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[3290] trunk

2011-06-20 Thread John Locke
Hi, Erik, See below... On 06/19/2011 12:18 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > I'm not really used to the system where you extract relevant changes > into the updates/ directory. Can someone walk me through how that > would work out fro this commit? > Since I just had to do this to update our production

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[3290] trunk

2011-06-19 Thread Erik Huelsmann
I'm not really used to the system where you extract relevant changes into the updates/ directory. Can someone walk me through how that would work out fro this commit? Thanks in advance! Bye, Erik. On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:42 PM, wrote: > Revision: 3290 >          http://ledger-smb.svn.source

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Announcing LedgerSMB 1.2.22

2011-06-15 Thread Robert J. Clay
All, On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Chris Travers wrote: > The LedgerSMB development team is proud to announce the release of > 1.2.22.  This release primarily fixes issues relating to Perl 5.12 and > LedgerSMB as well as some incorrect failures in test cases and some > issues for HST users in

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-20 Thread Chris Bennett
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:16:44AM -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > > 2) Technical documentation > 3) Code documentation User documentation is fine but coders need to have clear documentation for code. Changing each items documentation as it changes needs to be a requirement for that coder. No do

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-19 Thread Luke
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Chris Bennett wrote: > Installation is too difficult > Since 1.3 is really just a development phase, I think this issue can be > put at a lower priority > than documentation, but not too low. I think I disagree with that, at least somewhat, from two prospectives: First, whi

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-19 Thread Chris Bennett
I was lightly involved a good while back, but I had to basically close down my business for a while to care for my handicapped mother. >From reading this thread, and not having looked at 1.3, it seems that some >very particular issues are desperately needing to be fixed. These issues seem to be

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-18 Thread Luke
Chris What would it take to get a new beta, or should we call it alpha, release out the door very very soon? Since we know it won't work well, don't even bother the users with it, just make it a developer thing (post here, that is), and maybe announce it on the website. It least that would gi

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] How functional is 1.3?

2010-10-28 Thread John Locke
For those impatiently awaiting 1.3, I'm now pushing to a git repository on one of our public servers, at git://git.freelock.com/git/ledgersmb.git. You can browse it at http://git.freelock.com/?p=ledgersmb.git;a=summary (note that the recent Firefox update doesn't seem happy with the gitweb xhtml..

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Include this bug fix in next 1.2.x release?

2010-03-11 Thread John Locke
Personally, I don't want to take effort away from 1.3/2.x. So now let me change my mind and say "don't bother" with a checkbox. On the earlier DVCS dicussion, I'd vote for git (because we already use it for everything -- and keep a git mirror of the lsmb svn tree here: git://git.freelock.com/git/l

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Include this bug fix in next 1.2.x release?

2010-03-11 Thread Luke
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, John Locke wrote: > Hi, Chris, > > Haven't had a chance to read through all the architecture posts. But on > this bug fix, YES!!! > > I've got some immediate needs to run this type of report right now, > showing balance due at a particular date and excluding subsequent payment

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Email Format Poll for the list

2010-02-01 Thread Gerald Chudyk
html bad. Plain text good. -- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Email Format Poll for the list

2010-01-31 Thread Michael Richardson
> "David" == David Godfrey writes: David>Hi Everyone, The reason for this poll is below (for those David> that are interested) I would like to know how many people a) David> are happy to receive html b) prefer plain text c) require David> plain text At the end of the week

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Security Advisory Update (XSRF issues)

2010-01-28 Thread John Locke
Hi, Chris, Wow, that sounds like a pretty sophisticated attack. I would tend to think it would be much easier to trick the sysadmin with the root pw into granting sudo rights that let you into the database itself... how much prevention is really necessary? I do see the need for good CSRF protecti

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Postgres Security Update

2010-01-27 Thread David Godfrey
Josh Berkus wrote: On 1/27/10 2:33 PM, David Godfrey wrote: A heads up for all, There is a security update available for postgres. It also fixes some memory leaks and other things. Are you referring to 8.4.2? That came out a while ago ... That's strange, it was an

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[2687] trunk

2009-06-17 Thread Jeff Kowalczyk
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:53:41 -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > If auth fails, you will get connection failures with PG auth errors. This > is a permissions issue. > ... > Table and function permissions. I thought we had all these fixed in > Roles.sql. If not, the we need to get them fixed. Working

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[2687] trunk

2009-06-16 Thread Chris Travers
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote: > I'm eager to try out the trunk admin functions, which appear to be coming > together based on commit logs. > > What is the admin loging HTTP authentication expecting? If auth fails, you will get connection failures with PG auth errors. T

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-commits] SF.net SVN: ledger-smb:[2687] trunk

2009-06-16 Thread Jeff Kowalczyk
I'm eager to try out the trunk admin functions, which appear to be coming together based on commit logs. What is the admin loging HTTP authentication expecting? After running trunk/install-mycompany.sh, I have the myuser available. Trying the admin login with that username and password: [Tue Ju

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-SMB 1.2.13 validation tarball-- are we OK to release?

2008-02-23 Thread Chris Travers
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 4:23 AM, David A. Bandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > And this is on PostgreSQL 8.3, right? > > > > Yes, sorry -- forgot to add that. Tested against 8.3 (but 8.3 only, > not older versions). Ok. I was just asking because none of the changes should cause issues w

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-SMB 1.2.13 validation tarball-- are we OK to release?

2008-02-23 Thread David A. Bandel
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:05 PM, David A. Bandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi all; > > > > > > Any concerns about releasing

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-SMB 1.2.13 validation tarball-- are we OK to release?

2008-02-22 Thread Chris Travers
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:05 PM, David A. Bandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi all; > > > > Any concerns about releasing 1.2.13 from the validation tarball. > > I've hit almost every single page w/ no errors (or I'd

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-SMB 1.2.13 validation tarball-- are we OK to release?

2008-02-22 Thread David A. Bandel
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all; > > Any concerns about releasing 1.2.13 from the validation tarball. I've hit almost every single page w/ no errors (or I'd have reported). I may have missed something, but it's not obvious. Ciao, David A. Bande

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-SMB 1.2.13 validation tarball-- are we OK to release?

2008-02-22 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:33:41 -0800 "Chris Travers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all; > > Any concerns about releasing 1.2.13 from the validation tarball. > > B est Wishes, > Chris Travers no - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.co

[Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-SMB 1.2.13 validation tarball-- are we OK to release?

2008-02-22 Thread Chris Travers
Hi all; Any concerns about releasing 1.2.13 from the validation tarball. B est Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MR

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB Scalability Bottleneck-- proposal

2007-12-18 Thread Chris Travers
On Dec 18, 2007 8:57 AM, The Anarcat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:51:36PM -0800, Chris Travers wrote: > > My proposal is to offer a queue system for mass transaction processing. > > This would allow one to queue thousands of transactions which could then > be > > entered

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB Scalability Bottleneck-- proposal

2007-12-18 Thread The Anarcat
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:51:36PM -0800, Chris Travers wrote: > My proposal is to offer a queue system for mass transaction processing. > This would allow one to queue thousands of transactions which could then be > entered into batches or posted in the background. A message could be > delivered

  1   2   >