Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Email Format Poll for the list

2010-02-05 Thread David Godfrey
Hi Chris, With your late entry :) we can raise the "Prefer Plain Text" but "Multipart is Fine" count to 3. The newbies are why I suggested that maybe we should have a note about the preference to send in plain text (or at lease unformatted html) on the signup pages. Does your client not dynami

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Email Format Poll for the list

2010-02-05 Thread David Godfrey
Hi Stroller, You have raised some interesting issues that deserve special attention. Stroller wrote: > On 31 Jan 2010, at 00:46, David Godfrey wrote: >> ... and long before I sent an email on the list I had noticed that many >> contributors also sent in HTML. > > My belief was that the practice

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Email Format Poll for the list

2010-02-05 Thread Chris Travers
Just a couple things to keep in mind though: We can expect many newbies on this list (particularly the -users list) and many may not yet appreciate the value of text-only email. While I certainly prefer text-only, I think it is worth being fairly forgiving on this list.  One thing I would note is

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Email Format Poll for the list

2010-02-05 Thread David Godfrey
Ok So I am a day late, I said I would get this sent on Friday, and plumb forgot! The results on the poll were surprising considering the amount of HTML mail seen on the list. They were also disappointing, out of the entire subscriber base, there we only 16 responses. 2 Don't Care 2 Multi Par

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Email Format Poll for the list

2010-02-05 Thread Philip Rhoades
People, On 2010-02-06 06:25, Keith Edmunds wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:46:13 +0800, lsmb...@sbts.com.au said: > >> c) require plain text > > Yes. Me too. Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Working on a security best practices document

2010-02-05 Thread Chris Travers
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > "Chris" == Chris Travers writes: > Chris> How would one take an HTTP Digest Authentication token and >Chris> log into the db with it? > >>> From what I understand about the users' table (in 1.2 and SL)... >>> The

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB 1.3 VM?

2010-02-05 Thread Michael Richardson
> "David" == David A Bandel writes: >> Anyone created a VM with 1.3 installed yet. >> >> I would like to have a look at it without doing all the heavy >> lifting. David> Not yet -- on my todo list. I will share a .vdi for David> virtualbox (with complete instruction

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB 1.3 VM?

2010-02-05 Thread Michael Richardson
> "Armaghan" == Armaghan Saqib writes: >> Anyone created a VM with 1.3 installed yet. >> >> I would like to have a look at it without doing all the heavy >> lifting. Armaghan> I had made the old VM for 1.2/1.3 alpha. I shall be Armaghan> creating a new one soon with

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Working on a security best practices document

2010-02-05 Thread Michael Richardson
> "Chris" == Chris Travers writes: Chris> How would one take an HTTP Digest Authentication token and Chris> log into the db with it? >> From what I understand about the users' table (in 1.2 and SL)... >> The user connects, provides a password, and if it checks out, we >>

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Email Format Poll for the list

2010-02-05 Thread Keith Edmunds
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:46:13 +0800, lsmb...@sbts.com.au said: > c) require plain text Yes. -- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] LedgerSMB 1.3 VM?

2010-02-05 Thread David A . Bandel
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 22:22, GMAIL - James McDonald wrote: Anyone created a VM with 1.3 installed yet. I would like to have a look at it without doing all the heavy lifting. Not yet -- on my todo list. I will share a .vdi for virtualbox (with complete instructions) for anyone interested.