On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Ross Bearman
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'm currently looking to migrate from SQL-Ledger over to LedgerSMB. I
>> read
>> > one th
Hi Chris,
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Ross Bearman
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm currently looking to migrate from SQL-Ledger over to LedgerSMB. I
> read
> > one the migration help page that 2.6 > 1.1.12 was recommended. But I'm
> not
Well you can sign me up.
On 10/02/2011 11:05 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Ross Bearman
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm currently looking to migrate from SQL-Ledger over to LedgerSMB. I read
>> one the migration help page that 2.6 > 1.1.12 was recommended. But I'm not
>
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Ross Bearman
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently looking to migrate from SQL-Ledger over to LedgerSMB. I read
> one the migration help page that 2.6 > 1.1.12 was recommended. But I'm not
> sure if this has changed with 1.3?
>
> Would it be better to update SQL-Ledger
Hi all,
I'm currently looking to migrate from SQL-Ledger over to LedgerSMB. I
read one the migration help page that 2.6 > 1.1.12 was recommended. But
I'm not sure if this has changed with 1.3?
Would it be better to update SQL-Ledger to 2.8 than migrate, or migrate
to 1.1 than update to 1.3?
I'm trying to convert database from SQL-Ledger 2.6.27 to LedgerSMB but have no
luck.
I've loaded LedgerSMB 1.2.18 (latest stable), upload database from sql-ledger,
run upgrade scripts:
Pg-upgrade-2.6.12-2.6.17.sql
Pg-upgrade-2.6.17-2.6.18.sql
without any errors but when I try to login I get an e
On Friday 11 July 2008 11:56:06 Bob Miller wrote:
> I don't have ROSE installed, no, I was in the process of reading about
What linux distribution are you using?
On Gentoo I use the g-cpan
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/perl/g-cpan.xml
http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?rose_db_object
-
ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-users] upgrading from sql-ledger
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:28:30 -0700
Do you have ROSE installed?
I think ROSE generates the code based on whatever verson you are importing
from/to.
We will repost that co
Do you have ROSE installed?
I think ROSE generates the code based on whatever verson you are importing
from/to.
We will repost that code tommrrow.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
Sponso
-Original Message-
From: turtle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-users] upgrading from sql-ledger
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 02:34:47 -0700
On Friday 13 June 2008 13:11:19 Brian
On Friday 13 June 2008 13:11:19 Brian Carey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to upgrade to ledgersmb from more recent versions of
> sql-ledger (I'm on 2.8.13)? The UPGRADE document is for 2.6.something or
> lower.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
>
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Brian Carey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the sql/legacy directory there are upgrade scripts going back to even
> older versions than yours, so I'd imagine you're okay.
You actually need to run the SQL-Ledger upgrade scripts in the
sql/legacy/ directory starting
In the sql/legacy directory there are upgrade scripts going back to even
older versions than yours, so I'd imagine you're okay.
Brian
Joseph wrote:
> On 06/13/08 13:33, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>
>> You can either wait for LSMB 1.3 which will make this more feasible,
>> you can work through the
On 06/13/08 13:33, Chris Travers wrote:
>You can either wait for LSMB 1.3 which will make this more feasible,
>you can work through the database changes on your own, or you can hire
>someone to help you with it.
I'm in a similar situation but I'm using SQL-Ledger 2.2.7 and would like to
switch t
Hmm, maybe it's worth a try then. We only have one company and one
address per vendor, so I may try it. I'll search a little on the -dev
maillist archives for advice and experiences.
Thanks,
Brian
Chris Travers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Brian Carey
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Brian Carey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the (very fast) reply. (My biggest frustration with
> sql-ledger is the lack of community support. As a long time linux/FOSS
> user I am used to active maillists and forums.)
>
> Anyway, I'll wait for 1.3. An
Thanks a lot for the (very fast) reply. (My biggest frustration with
sql-ledger is the lack of community support. As a long time linux/FOSS
user I am used to active maillists and forums.)
Anyway, I'll wait for 1.3. Any idea of when it will be released?
Thanks again,
Brian
Chris Travers wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Brian Carey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to upgrade to ledgersmb from more recent versions of
> sql-ledger (I'm on 2.8.13)? The UPGRADE document is for 2.6.something or
> lower.
There are some fundamental issues at the moment with upgrading
Hi,
Is there any way to upgrade to ledgersmb from more recent versions of
sql-ledger (I'm on 2.8.13)? The UPGRADE document is for 2.6.something or
lower.
Thanks,
Brian
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 17:20, Chris Travers wrote:
> On 6/26/07, Leah Kubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hopefully quick question:
> >
> > As I remember, generally the process is to migrate SQL-Ledger to
> > Ledger-SMB 1.1, and then to upgrade from that to LedgerSMB 1.2.x ... Am I
> > correct, o
On 6/26/07, Leah Kubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hopefully quick question:
>
> As I remember, generally the process is to migrate SQL-Ledger to Ledger-SMB
> 1.1, and then to upgrade from that to LedgerSMB 1.2.x ... Am I correct, or is
> there now a more direct migration path?
In some ways, that
Leah Kubik wrote:
> Hopefully quick question:
>
> As I remember, generally the process is to migrate SQL-Ledger to Ledger-SMB
> 1.1, and then to upgrade from that to LedgerSMB 1.2.x ... Am I correct, or is
> there now a more direct migration path?
That is correct.
>
> Thanks,
> Leah
--
Hopefully quick question:
As I remember, generally the process is to migrate SQL-Ledger to Ledger-SMB
1.1, and then to upgrade from that to LedgerSMB 1.2.x ... Am I correct, or is
there now a more direct migration path?
Thanks,
Leah
--
Leah Kubik : d416-585-9971x692 : d416-703-5977 : m416-559-
23 matches
Mail list logo
