Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-06 Thread Paul Cundell
Thank you Graham, at least somebody got the joke. On 6 May 2014 13:04, "Graham White" wrote: > > "Still you lot know best" - whose tag line was that back in the Great Wilko Flame War? Was it VoF or Pope Paul? > > The good old days :-) ___ Leedslist ma

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-06 Thread [broken-address] Graham White
"Still you lot know best" - whose tag line was that back in the Great Wilko Flame War?   Was it VoF or Pope Paul? The good old days :-)   Graham White On Tuesday, 6 May 2014, 11:28, Paul Cundell wrote: Look out here come the thought police! Didn't realise y

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-06 Thread Peter Castlehouse
. Thought Police? fer Christ’s sake or are you just rekindling the old and infamous List flame wars from years gone by? : ) PEe From: Paul Cundell [mailto:p...@cundell.com] Sent: Tuesday, 6 May 2014 8:28 PM To: Peter Castlehouse Cc: Leeds List; Ian Murray Subject: RE: [LU] Wickham

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-06 Thread Paul Cundell
Look out here come the thought police! Didn't realise you were only allowed an opinion as long as it agreed with Ian. You know best. On 6 May 2014 10:43, "Peter Castlehouse" wrote: > > Actually Ian, I am with you for your first sentence - Paul, have you gone off your medication, as you are seriou

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-06 Thread Peter Castlehouse
ginal Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Ian Murray Sent: Tuesday, 6 May 2014 7:29 PM To: Paul Cundell Cc: Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] Wickham I dunno why you have to jump up and down so much Paul. Calm. Down. You're right about

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-06 Thread Ian Murray
I dunno why you have to jump up and down so much Paul. Calm. Down. You're right about one thing though - I do know best. McDermott won't be in charge at Christmas. Care to have a wager? £45 says he'll have his P45 by then. Sent from my iPhone > On 6 May 2014, at 17:09, "Paul Cundell" wrote: >

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-06 Thread Paul Cundell
Ian M wrote: Completely agreed on this one Phill. It's astonishing really. What's astonishing really is that you felt the need to repost 2 complete emails and footers just to inform us that you agree with someone who agrees with you! Shock horror!  BMc still has a job I see, maybe not everyone a

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-05 Thread Ian Murray
Completely agreed on this one Phill. It's astonishing really. Sent from my iPhone > On 6 May 2014, at 1:43, "Phill Shields" wrote: > > I don't know why anyone would look for excuses to support the decision to > play Wickham on the wing. There were plenty of other options to give us width. > >

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-05 Thread Phill Shields
I don't know why anyone would look for excuses to support the decision to play Wickham on the wing. There were plenty of other options to give us width. Wickham and Smith would have been a real handful with McCormack playing in the hole. He has just got player of the month playing centre forwar

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-05 Thread Richard Naef
> We didn't need him. We needed a midfielder or a defender. Our problem > stems from shite defending and lack of midfield creativity. and some width and someone who can cross a ball and someone who can take a corner and get it over the first defender, maybe even, god forbid someone who can take t

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-05 Thread Jim Moran
We didn't need him. We needed a midfielder or a defender. Our problem stems from shite defending and lack of midfield creativity. With a decent midfield, smith and McCormack could both get 30 a season. -- > On 5 May 2014, at 15:38, "Guy Bonello" wrote: > > Problem was that Smith was scoring

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-05 Thread Guy Bonello
Problem was that Smith was scoring goals at the time and BMcD did not want to drop him, so the only alternative was to play Wickham, Ross and Smith. Ross and wickham have played wide in the past , so was the only way to fit all three into the starting XI > There's nothing angry in my replies. > A

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-04 Thread rhys hodge
We know McD likes 352, why couldn't that work with McC and Wickham both up top as the 2 From: Ian Murray To: Paul Cundell Cc: Leeds List Sent: Sunday, 4 May 2014 4:04 PM Subject: Re: [LU] Wickham You need to stop being so angry. It's not go

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-04 Thread Richard Walker
Know what you mean - I had a full day of it, now I've got to face a family barbecue today. Hair of the dog. Sent from my iPad > On 4 May 2014, at 08:13, Ted wrote: > > I noticed that Sunderland's goal came from a Wickham cross from the right > wing! > > McDermott - tactical genius ;-) > >

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-04 Thread Ted
I noticed that Sunderland's goal came from a Wickham cross from the right wing! McDermott - tactical genius ;-) Happy Birthday for yesterday Rich. I like early kick-offs but it means I'm in the pub(s) far too long - im suffering this morning! Ted H

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Richard Walker
Nowt wrong with anger - it's good for you. Sent from my iPad > On 4 May 2014, at 07:48, Paul Cundell wrote: > > There's nothing angry in my replies. > As I recall we did play both, but that's not good enough for you, you seem > to want us to have built a team around a loan player. > Seems prett

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Paul Cundell
There's nothing angry in my replies. As I recall we did play both, but that's not good enough for you, you seem to want us to have built a team around a loan player. Seems pretty clueless to me but you know best. On 4 May 2014 05:04, "Ian Murray" wrote: > > You need to stop being so angry. It's n

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Ian Murray
You need to stop being so angry. It's not good for you. Why can't we play the both? McCormack is a number 10 type player, dropping deeper etc, Wickham is a target man. He's definitely not a left winger anyway. Sent from my iPhone > On 4 May 2014, at 2:34, "Paul Cundell" wrote: > > Nick comes

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Paul Cundell
Nick comes to your rescue so ok come on Mr Football Manager, who were the rest of this world beating 442 then? If you reckon we could have played them both upfront name the rest of the line up. On 3 May 2014 17:17, "Ian Murray" wrote: > > Thanks Nick. Are we talking a different language to Paul?

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Ian Murray
Thanks Nick. Are we talking a different language to Paul? Sent from my iPhone > On 3 May 2014, at 23:03, "Nicholas Armit" wrote: > > eh play two together maybe? > > From: Paul Cundell > To: Ian Murray > Cc: Leeds List > Sent: Saturday, May 3, 2014 10

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Ian Murray
Really? Do you think McCormack ad Wickham are like for like? Do you really? Sent from my iPhone > On 3 May 2014, at 22:58, "Paul Cundell" wrote: > > I'm awesome mate, had a great afternoon with the best fans at the best club > in the world. > > But are you alright cos you're not making sense,

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread [broken-address] Nicholas Armit
eh play two together maybe? From: Paul Cundell To: Ian Murray Cc: Leeds List Sent: Saturday, May 3, 2014 10:58 AM Subject: Re: [LU] Wickham I'm awesome mate, had a great afternoon with the best fans at the best club in the world. But are you alrigh

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Paul Cundell
I'm awesome mate, had a great afternoon with the best fans at the best club in the world. But are you alright cos you're not making sense, Wickham should have played upfront you said. Not playing him there proves BMc is clueless you said. So if Wickham played No 9 where would Ross play? On the wi

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Ian Murray
Wow. I never said he should play instead of McCormack. Are you ok mate? Sent from my iPhone > On 3 May 2014, at 21:57, "Paul Cundell" wrote: > > Ha ha ha ha > Now I've heard it all, you're suggesting a wet behind the ears loanee should > have been played instead of Ross. It's you that's clu

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Paul Cundell
Ha ha ha ha Now I've heard it all, you're suggesting a wet behind the ears loanee should have been played instead of Ross. It's you that's clueless. One defeat in 5 games and you want him sacking. We totally out played Derby in the 2nd half. It's so refreshing that you lot know best though. On 3 M

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Ian Murray
He's a number 9, strong, holds it up, target man Paul! Sent from my iPhone > On 3 May 2014, at 18:26, "Paul Cundell" wrote: > > "Completely out of position"? > If he played him as centre back I'd agree but on the wing of a 3 pronged > attack alongside a 30 goal a season central striker is no

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Paul Cundell
"Completely out of position"? If he played him as centre back I'd agree but on the wing of a 3 pronged attack alongside a 30 goal a season central striker is not 'completely out of position'. Anyway you lot know best. On 3 May 2014 11:15, "Ian Murray" wrote: > > BMC played him completely out of p

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Paul Cundell
You 'know besters' can chunter on here all you want but I can guarantee that BMc will NOT be sacked before kick off. Playing players 'out of position' is a fictional excuse, players play out if position all the time. Would you prefer Wickham had played upfront instead of Ross? I doubt it. On 3 May

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread rhys hodge
heers Rhys From: Paul Cundell To: Richard Walker Cc: Leeds List Sent: Saturday, 3 May 2014 10:10 PM Subject: Re: [LU] Wickham You certainly did. I was making the point that Wickham's loan was cancelled because GFH couldn't afford him not because B

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Ian Murray
BMC played him completely out of position though Paul. We need a new coach now. Sent from my iPhone > On 3 May 2014, at 18:10, "Paul Cundell" wrote: > > You certainly did. I was making the point that Wickham's loan was cancelled > because GFH couldn't afford him not because BMc thought he was

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Paul Cundell
You certainly did. I was making the point that Wickham's loan was cancelled because GFH couldn't afford him not because BMc thought he wasn't good enough. On 3 May 2014 10:02, "Richard Walker" wrote: > > I said he my match reports that he was a class above but he was playing on the wing !? >

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-03 Thread Richard Walker
I said he my match reports that he was a class above but he was playing on the wing !? Sent from my iPad > On 2 May 2014, at 22:14, Paul Cundell wrote: > >> On 2 May 2014 14:47, "Mark" wrote: >> >> Premier League player of the month. What does that say about Brian's > coaching and management

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-02 Thread Ian Murray
Warnock loaned Barkley didn't he, n then didn't play him. McD had wickham on the left. I still reckon he's clueless and should be put out of his misery. Sent from my iPhone > On 3 May 2014, at 5:14, "Paul Cundell" wrote: > >> On 2 May 2014 14:47, "Mark" wrote: >> >> Premier League player o

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-02 Thread Paul Cundell
On 2 May 2014 14:47, "Mark" wrote: > > Premier League player of the month. What does that say about Brian's coaching and management capabilities? Get rid of this guy after the final whistle of the last game of the season. I thought Wickham was doing well for us until GFH ran out of money? Brian M

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-02 Thread Matt Anderson
We break promising/ talented players and managers Sent from my iPhone > On 2 May 2014, at 16:49, Ian Murray wrote: > > What is it with us and signing great young players on loan, and making them > shit? Wickham, Barkley, Bannan, Townsend. Barkley is probably going to the > World Cup and Towns

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-02 Thread N H
;t supported by the dross around them, in our current team only to return to their Prem teams where our coaching pays off Hmmm or maybe not.. From: Ian Murray To: Robert Heath Cc: "Leedslist@gn.apc.org" Sent: Friday, May 2, 2014 11:49 AM

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-02 Thread Ian Murray
What is it with us and signing great young players on loan, and making them shit? Wickham, Barkley, Bannan, Townsend. Barkley is probably going to the World Cup and Townsend would if he wasn't injured. Sent from my iPhone > On 2 May 2014, at 22:19, "Robert Heath" wrote: > > Wickham has been

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-02 Thread Robert Heath
Wickham has been on record to say that the key to his goalscoring landslide was the opportunity to watch Noel Hunt in action during training., On 2 May 2014 16:47, Mark wrote: > Premier League player of the month. What does that say about Brian's > coaching and management capabilities? Get rid

Re: [LU] Wickham

2014-05-02 Thread Jim Moran
Also says a lot about loan players in general - they don't really give a stuff about the team they're loaned out too. But in this case McD did a terrible job. On 2 May 2014 14:47, Mark wrote: > Premier League player of the month. What does that say about Brian's > coaching and management capab

[LU] Wickham

2014-05-02 Thread Mark
Premier League player of the month. What does that say about Brian's coaching and management capabilities? Get rid of this guy after the final whistle of the last game of the season. Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago Fire

[LU] Wickham

2014-04-16 Thread Matt Anderson
Goal machine Sent from my iPhone ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org John 'Grampa' Sykes Rest In Peace old lad 28th Oct 1938 - 12 N