Ian M wrote:
Completely agreed on this one Phill. It's astonishing really.
What's astonishing really is that you felt the need to repost 2 complete emails
and footers just to inform us that you agree with someone who agrees with you!
Shock horror!
BMc still has a job I see, maybe not everyone
I dunno why you have to jump up and down so much Paul. Calm. Down.
You're right about one thing though - I do know best. McDermott won't be in
charge at Christmas. Care to have a wager? £45 says he'll have his P45 by then.
Sent from my iPhone
On 6 May 2014, at 17:09, Paul Cundell
Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Ian Murray
Sent: Tuesday, 6 May 2014 7:29 PM
To: Paul Cundell
Cc: Leeds List
Subject: Re: [LU] Wickham
I dunno why you have to jump up and down so much Paul. Calm. Down.
You're right about one thing
Look out here come the thought police!
Didn't realise you were only allowed an opinion as long as it agreed with
Ian.
You know best.
On 6 May 2014 10:43, Peter Castlehouse dubca...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Actually Ian, I am with you for your first sentence - Paul, have you gone
off your medication,
.
Thought Police? fer Christ’s sake or are you just rekindling the old and
infamous List flame wars from years gone by? : )
PEe
From: Paul Cundell [mailto:p...@cundell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 May 2014 8:28 PM
To: Peter Castlehouse
Cc: Leeds List; Ian Murray
Subject: RE: [LU] Wickham
Thank you Graham, at least somebody got the joke.
On 6 May 2014 13:04, Graham White gcwhite2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Still you lot know best - whose tag line was that back in the Great
Wilko Flame War? Was it VoF or Pope Paul?
The good old days :-)
Problem was that Smith was scoring goals at the time and BMcD did not want
to drop him, so the only alternative was to play Wickham, Ross and Smith.
Ross and wickham have played wide in the past , so was the only way to fit
all three into the starting XI
There's nothing angry in my replies.
As
We didn't need him. We needed a midfielder or a defender. Our problem stems
from shite defending and lack of midfield creativity. With a decent midfield,
smith and McCormack could both get 30 a season.
--
On 5 May 2014, at 15:38, Guy Bonello bone...@maltanet.mt wrote:
Problem was that
We didn't need him. We needed a midfielder or a defender. Our problem
stems from shite defending and lack of midfield creativity.
and some width and someone who can cross a ball and someone who can take a
corner and get it over the first defender, maybe even, god forbid someone
who can take
I don't know why anyone would look for excuses to support the decision to play
Wickham on the wing. There were plenty of other options to give us width.
Wickham and Smith would have been a real handful with McCormack playing in the
hole.
He has just got player of the month playing centre
Completely agreed on this one Phill. It's astonishing really.
Sent from my iPhone
On 6 May 2014, at 1:43, Phill Shields phillshie...@hotmail.com wrote:
I don't know why anyone would look for excuses to support the decision to
play Wickham on the wing. There were plenty of other options to
There's nothing angry in my replies.
As I recall we did play both, but that's not good enough for you, you seem
to want us to have built a team around a loan player.
Seems pretty clueless to me but you know best.
On 4 May 2014 05:04, Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com wrote:
You need to stop
Nowt wrong with anger - it's good for you.
Sent from my iPad
On 4 May 2014, at 07:48, Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com wrote:
There's nothing angry in my replies.
As I recall we did play both, but that's not good enough for you, you seem
to want us to have built a team around a loan player.
I noticed that Sunderland's goal came from a Wickham cross from the right
wing!
McDermott - tactical genius ;-)
Happy Birthday for yesterday Rich.
I like early kick-offs but it means I'm in the pub(s) far too long - im
suffering this morning!
Ted H
Know what you mean - I had a full day of it, now I've got to face a family
barbecue today. Hair of the dog.
Sent from my iPad
On 4 May 2014, at 08:13, Ted tedhea...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that Sunderland's goal came from a Wickham cross from the right
wing!
McDermott - tactical
We know McD likes 352, why couldn't that work with McC and Wickham both up top
as the 2
From: Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com
To: Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com
Cc: Leeds List leedslist@gn.apc.org
Sent: Sunday, 4 May 2014 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [LU
I said he my match reports that he was a class above but he was playing on the
wing !?
Sent from my iPad
On 2 May 2014, at 22:14, Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com wrote:
On 2 May 2014 14:47, Mark wiscole...@hotmail.com wrote:
Premier League player of the month. What does that say about
You certainly did. I was making the point that Wickham's loan was cancelled
because GFH couldn't afford him not because BMc thought he wasn't good
enough.
On 3 May 2014 10:02, Richard Walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I said he my match reports that he was a class above but he was playing
BMC played him completely out of position though Paul.
We need a new coach now.
Sent from my iPhone
On 3 May 2014, at 18:10, Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com wrote:
You certainly did. I was making the point that Wickham's loan was cancelled
because GFH couldn't afford him not because BMc
From: Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com
To: Richard Walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: Leeds List leedslist@gn.apc.org
Sent: Saturday, 3 May 2014 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: [LU] Wickham
You certainly did. I was making the point that Wickham's loan was cancelled
because
You 'know besters' can chunter on here all you want but I can guarantee
that BMc will NOT be sacked before kick off.
Playing players 'out of position' is a fictional excuse, players play out
if position all the time. Would you prefer Wickham had played upfront
instead of Ross? I doubt it.
On 3
Completely out of position?
If he played him as centre back I'd agree but on the wing of a 3 pronged
attack alongside a 30 goal a season central striker is not 'completely out
of position'.
Anyway you lot know best.
On 3 May 2014 11:15, Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com wrote:
BMC played
He's a number 9, strong, holds it up, target man Paul!
Sent from my iPhone
On 3 May 2014, at 18:26, Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com wrote:
Completely out of position?
If he played him as centre back I'd agree but on the wing of a 3 pronged
attack alongside a 30 goal a season central
Wow.
I never said he should play instead of McCormack. Are you ok mate?
Sent from my iPhone
On 3 May 2014, at 21:57, Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com wrote:
Ha ha ha ha
Now I've heard it all, you're suggesting a wet behind the ears loanee should
have been played instead of Ross. It's you
I'm awesome mate, had a great afternoon with the best fans at the best club
in the world.
But are you alright cos you're not making sense, Wickham should have
played upfront you said.
Not playing him there proves BMc is clueless you said.
So if Wickham played No 9 where would Ross play? On the
eh play two together maybe?
From: Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com
To: Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com
Cc: Leeds List leedslist@gn.apc.org
Sent: Saturday, May 3, 2014 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [LU] Wickham
I'm awesome mate, had a great afternoon
Really? Do you think McCormack ad Wickham are like for like? Do you really?
Sent from my iPhone
On 3 May 2014, at 22:58, Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com wrote:
I'm awesome mate, had a great afternoon with the best fans at the best club
in the world.
But are you alright cos you're not
Sent: Saturday, May 3, 2014 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [LU] Wickham
I'm awesome mate, had a great afternoon with the best fans at the best club
in the world.
But are you alright cos you're not making sense, Wickham should have
played upfront you said.
Not playing him there proves BMc
Nick comes to your rescue so ok come on Mr Football Manager, who were the
rest of this world beating 442 then?
If you reckon we could have played them both upfront name the rest of the
line up.
On 3 May 2014 17:17, Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks Nick. Are we talking a
You need to stop being so angry. It's not good for you.
Why can't we play the both? McCormack is a number 10 type player, dropping
deeper etc, Wickham is a target man. He's definitely not a left winger anyway.
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 May 2014, at 2:34, Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com wrote:
Premier League player of the month. What does that say about Brian's coaching
and management capabilities? Get rid of this guy after the final whistle of the
last game of the season.
Cheers
Mark
El Presidente Wisconsin Whites
Leeds United
Chicago Fire
Also says a lot about loan players in general - they don't really give a
stuff about the team they're loaned out too.
But in this case McD did a terrible job.
On 2 May 2014 14:47, Mark wiscole...@hotmail.com wrote:
Premier League player of the month. What does that say about Brian's
coaching
Wickham has been on record to say that the key to his goalscoring landslide
was the opportunity to watch Noel Hunt in action during training.,
On 2 May 2014 16:47, Mark wiscole...@hotmail.com wrote:
Premier League player of the month. What does that say about Brian's
coaching and management
What is it with us and signing great young players on loan, and making them
shit? Wickham, Barkley, Bannan, Townsend. Barkley is probably going to the
World Cup and Townsend would if he wasn't injured.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2 May 2014, at 22:19, Robert Heath rhe...@asd.edu.qa wrote:
: Friday, May 2, 2014 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [LU] Wickham
What is it with us and signing great young players on loan, and making them
shit? Wickham, Barkley, Bannan, Townsend. Barkley is probably going to the
World Cup and Townsend would if he wasn't injured.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2 May
On 2 May 2014 14:47, Mark wiscole...@hotmail.com wrote:
Premier League player of the month. What does that say about Brian's
coaching and management capabilities? Get rid of this guy after the final
whistle of the last game of the season.
I thought Wickham was doing well for us until GFH ran
Warnock loaned Barkley didn't he, n then didn't play him.
McD had wickham on the left. I still reckon he's clueless and should be put out
of his misery.
Sent from my iPhone
On 3 May 2014, at 5:14, Paul Cundell p...@cundell.com wrote:
On 2 May 2014 14:47, Mark wiscole...@hotmail.com wrote:
Goal machine
Sent from my iPhone
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
John 'Grampa' Sykes
Rest In Peace old lad
28th Oct 1938 - 12
38 matches
Mail list logo
