Re: [LU] Fuck sake ...

Next 4 games.Liverpool Villa Brighton Reading...let's see where we are after that little run. On 27 Nov 2016 11:05, "Alec McQueen" wrote: Right now we look like the luckiest of a bunch of mediocre teams from 5th to about 10th. It will be a miracle if we stay 5th,

Re: [LU] Fuck sake ...

Right now we look like the luckiest of a bunch of mediocre teams from 5th to about 10th. It will be a miracle if we stay 5th, but we're definitely doing better than previous seasons. Monk looks like a proper manager. Let's hope we don't go on a poor run and MC gets impatient with the higher

Re: [LU] Fuck sake ...

I can sympathise with both camps.it certainly was uncomfortable and infuriating viewing watching that second half, but (even if we did use up a season's worth of good luck in the first half!)... we did somehiw find a way to get out of what is always a tricky fixture with 3 more

Re: [LU] Fuck sake ...

Yeah top 6 is nice and if we play shit and pick up points every game we'll all be happy. I can't wait for the inevitable crushing disappointment. MOT I Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: Shane Larkin Date: 27/11/2016

[LU] Fuck sake ...

Fuck sake lads we won ... the past Leeds team of old would have given in and got a draw - play bad and win is the way - top 6 is where we will be ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Indeed , but that was proper shit from Leeds. I'm not a fan of Philips or O'Kane however I think Chris Wood's performance has to go down as one of the worst performances from a Leeds striker who scored. Lee Chapman owns most of those but that was worse than he ever served up. Woods is a poor

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Still...up to 5th! Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 26, 2016, at 2:51 PM, {broken-address} Nicholas Armit > wrote: > > Really poor the last 20...i get controlling the game etc but it only takes > one chance to transform everything and that is what happened.

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Really poor the last 20...i get controlling the game etc but it only takes one chance to transform everything and that is what happened. How they missed that last chance at the end. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 26, 2016, at 2:01 PM, {broken-address} Richard Walker >

Re: [LU] Rotherham

No I don't like Phillips either. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 26, 2016, at 2:14 PM, Ted wrote: > > I think there's flashes of decent play. Admittedly, it's against the team > at the bottom. > > Still the best period we've had for a while (bar Geordies) > > I'm still not

Re: [LU] wtf?

Shocking 2nd half against a piss poor team of 10 men . Wayne Sent from BlueMail On 26 Nov 2016, at 19:31, davidwool...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, so that 2nd half wasn't good. Original Message From: Richard Naef Sent: Saturday, 26 November

Re: [LU] wtf?

Ok, so that 2nd half wasn't good.   Original Message   From: Richard Naef Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2016 20:25 To: leeds list Subject: [LU] wtf? ttfn Richard ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

[LU] wtf?

ttfn Richard ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER

Re: [LU] Rotherham

O'Kane is shit Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Nov 2016, at 19:14, Ted wrote: > > I think there's flashes of decent play. Admittedly, it's against the team > at the bottom. > > Still the best period we've had for a while (bar Geordies) > > I'm still not convinced by Philips

Re: [LU] Rotherham

And flashes of truly awful defending! On 26 Nov 2016 19:14, "Ted" wrote: > I think there's flashes of decent play. Admittedly, it's against the team > at the bottom. > > Still the best period we've had for a while (bar Geordies) > > I'm still not convinced by Philips tho,

Re: [LU] Rotherham

I think there's flashes of decent play. Admittedly, it's against the team at the bottom. Still the best period we've had for a while (bar Geordies) I'm still not convinced by Philips tho, maybe I'm missing something. On 26 Nov 2016 7:01 p.m., "Richard Walker" wrote:

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Poor football from us Ted if we're honest. Of course , it's 3 points and we're all happy Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Nov 2016, at 18:52, Ted wrote: > > Jeez - you can't please some people, two nil up away from home ffs. > > Believe! MOT > >> On 26 Nov 2016 6:51 p.m.,

Re: [LU] Rotherham

What that man said Sent from my Windows 10 phone From: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit Sent: 26 November 2016 17:59 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] Rotherham Are truly awful. We should be playing quicker and getting at them more. Sent from my iPhone

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Get a 3rd then take off anyone on 4 bookings. 1 Dec is final date for 5 bookings meaning suspension.   Original Message   From: {broken-address} Richard Walker Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2016 19:39 To: {broken-address} Richard Walker Cc: Leeds List; Paul Cundell Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham I

Re: [LU] Rotherham

I really hope we go for it and murder them ! Mary Jane ale going down well Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Nov 2016, at 18:35, {broken-address} Richard Walker > wrote: > > Paul, where you been ? We need more arguments on the list. > > Sent from my

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Paul, where you been ? We need more arguments on the list. Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Nov 2016, at 18:32, Paul Cundell wrote: > > Behave David, it makes a change for me to agree with Rich Walker! > >> On 26 Nov 2016 18:29, wrote: >> >> By God the

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Behave David, it makes a change for me to agree with Rich Walker! On 26 Nov 2016 18:29, wrote: > By God the list is a bunch is miserable g1ts sometimes!!! > > > Original Message > From: Paul Cundell > Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2016 19:28 > To: {broken-address}

Re: [LU] Rotherham

By God the list is a bunch is miserable g1ts sometimes!!!   Original Message   From: Paul Cundell Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2016 19:28 To: {broken-address} Richard Walker Cc: Leeds List; {broken-address} Nicholas Armit Subject: Re: [LU] Rotherham It is a good job they're sh*te, even when

Re: [LU] Rotherham

It is a good job they're sh*te, even when offside they can't hit the target from inside the six yard box, but we go into half time 2 up and I know you can only beat what's in front of you but if we play like this on Tuesday it will be bloody embarrassing. Cheers Paul On 26 Nov 2016 18:18,

Re: [LU] Rotherham

Thought we played very well whilst it was 11 v 11 though and it has been Roofe's best match I have seen for us - no coincidence it is his first match through the middle.  A lot of positives.   Original Message   From: {broken-address} Richard Walker Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2016 19:18 To:

Re: [LU] Rotherham

I spend half of these games screaming at Wood on the telly. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 26, 2016, at 1:17 PM, {broken-address} Richard Walker > wrote: > > They've been the best team since they went down to 10 men. Cooper done nowt > wrong but

Re: [LU] Rotherham

They've been the best team since they went down to 10 men. Cooper done nowt wrong but we're not the same at the back without Jansson Philips and O'Kane weak in midfield. Woods despite his goal is static and has the touch of a rapist. > On 26 Nov 2016, at 17:58, {broken-address} Nicholas Armit

Re: [LU] Rotherham

> Are truly awful. We should be playing quicker and getting at them more. they are down to 10 men and they've lost 2 players to injury already - I've got a really bad feeling about this... ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

[LU] Rotherham

Are truly awful. We should be playing quicker and getting at them more. Sent from my iPhone ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org