[LU] Cricket

Anybody else watching the Test Match? One of the umpires gives the Leeds salute when he signals a 4. (Almostsans the clenched fist.) ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To

Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket

.uk> To: Matt <matthew.gayn...@btopenworld.com>; "Robinson, Mick" <mick.robin...@miq.com>; Ian Murray <ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com> Cc: "leedslist@gn.apc.org" <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Tuesday, 26 September 2017, 14:46 Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU:

Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket

7 19:54 (GMT+08:00) To: "Robinson, Mick" <mick.robin...@miq.com> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket As an Essex fan. I'm enjoying our Leicester like triumph. Hoping to be at Chelmsford tomorrow to see us polish off the Yorkies and complete an unbeaten sea

Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket

Obviously the Essex Lad who messed up the Dizzy Pens at half time -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Ian Murray Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 12:59 To: Matt; Robinson, Mick Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket

Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket

Can someone can this guy? Betty? Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: Matt <matthew.gayn...@btopenworld.com> Date: 26/09/2017 19:54 (GMT+08:00) To: "Robinson, Mick" <mick.robin...@miq.com> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re

Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket

m> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket > > [EXTERNAL] > That would have not been very Cricket would it? > > On 26 September 2017 at 11:04, Robinson, Mick > <mick.robin...@miq.com<mailto:mick.robin...@miq.com>> wrote: > No

Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket

com> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket [EXTERNAL] That would have not been very Cricket would it? On 26 September 2017 at 11:04, Robinson, Mick <mick.robin...@miq.com<mailto:mick.robin...@miq.com>> wrote: No, Somerset needed to win, and get an extra bowling

Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket

gt; > > > *From:* Jim Moran [mailto:j...@jimmoran.co.uk] > *Sent:* 26 September 2017 10:55 > *To:* Robinson, Mick <mick.robin...@miq.com> > *Cc:* leedslist@gn.apc.org > *Subject:* Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket > > > > *[EXTERNAL]* > > Wouldn't So

Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket

ubject: Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket [EXTERNAL] Wouldn't Somerset put them back in again to follow on and then win the game? On 26 September 2017 at 10:41, Robinson, Mick <mick.robin...@miq.com<mailto:mick.robin...@miq.com>> wrote: Just following the cricket, very happy Yorkshire

Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket

They're 22/5 now, so I bet they wish they had... On 26 September 2017 at 10:54, Jim Moran wrote: > Wouldn't Somerset put them back in again to follow on and then win the > game? > > On 26 September 2017 at 10:41, Robinson, Mick > wrote: > > > Just

Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket

Wouldn't Somerset put them back in again to follow on and then win the game? On 26 September 2017 at 10:41, Robinson, Mick wrote: > Just following the cricket, very happy Yorkshire are safe. > > However, If Middlesex declare now at 18-3 they save themselves from >

[LU] Non LU: Cricket

Just following the cricket, very happy Yorkshire are safe. However, If Middlesex declare now at 18-3 they save themselves from relegation, dare they do that??? ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

Re: [LU] Non LU Cricket

I think so, some good batting to come, 250 would be a good score, and it’s still raining down the road. From: John Boocock [mailto:j...@boocock.net] Sent: 16 May 2017 15:58 To: Robinson, Mick <mick.robin...@miq.com>; Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Subject: RE: [LU] Non LU Cricke

Re: [LU] Non LU Cricket

with a Tykes win -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:[1]leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of John Boocock Sent: 16 May [2]2017 15:03 To: [3]leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] Non LU Cricket Well we are underway at 3pm with 45 overseas agreed. Anyon

Re: [LU] Non LU Cricket

Listening in online ☹ Good news is Derby off for rain again. I will take a washout down there with a Tykes win -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of John Boocock Sent: 16 May 2017 15:03 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] Non LU

[LU] Non LU Cricket

Well we are underway at 3pm with 45 overseas agreed. Anyone else here? Betty Sent from the North ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email

[LU] NON LU - cricket - Ashes 1 up

-- Message: 4 Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 20:58:06 +0100 From: Richard walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk To: Robert Heath rhe...@asd.edu.qa Cc: leeds list leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] NON LU - cricket - Ashes 1 up Who watched it though ? Not many beer

Re: [LU] NON LU - cricket - Ashes 1 up

...@hotmail.com] Sent: 15 July 2013 12:39 To: David Brennan Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] NON LU - cricket - Ashes 1 up I love cricket. It's a different game to football - pretty incomparable really mate. Sent from my iPhone On 15/07/2013, at 19:24, David Brennan d.r.bren

Re: [LU] NON LU - cricket - Ashes 1 up

What a fantastic match! Test cricket,eh? I'll be @ lord's on thursday for the next installment. Can't wait! On 14 July 2013 16:35, nat...@sky.com nat...@sky.com wrote: What an amazing end to a pretty amazing test match I did not think he touched it even with hotspot etc but now I have seen

Re: [LU] NON LU - cricket - Ashes 1 up

Who watched it though ? Not many beer gardens with big screens. Sent from my iPad On 14 Jul 2013, at 19:12, Robert Heath rhe...@asd.edu.qa wrote: What a fantastic match! Test cricket,eh? I'll be @ lord's on thursday for the next installment. Can't wait! On 14 July 2013 16:35,

Re: [LU] NON LU - cricket - Ashes 1 up

Good point. I found a really good stream and watched it on my computer, but sitting on a hard chair in front of a small screen for 5 days was not that much fun. On 14 July 2013 22:58, Richard walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Who watched it though ? Not many beer gardens with big screens.

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

Dave From: markbu...@aol.com markbu...@aol.com To: nat...@sky.com nat...@sky.com Cc: leeds list leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 15:59 Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast) Ok, here goes

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

To: nat...@sky.com nat...@sky.com Cc: leeds list leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 15:59 Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast) Ok, here goes... First batsman hits a four off the first ball. He then hits

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

@gn.apc.org Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 15:59 Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast) Ok, here goes... First batsman hits a four off the first ball. He then hits three off the second ball but the umpire rules the second

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

not not if there are any others which would work Dave From: markbu...@aol.com markbu...@aol.com To: nat...@sky.com nat...@sky.com Cc: leeds list leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 15:59 Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

.     From: markbu...@aol.com markbu...@aol.com To: Jim Moran j...@jimmoran.co.uk Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Wednesday, 10 July 2013, 10:40 Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast) dunno

[LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

Last 2 batsmen are both on 94 in a one day game They need 7 to win and there are 3 balls left How can they both get a century ? Like I say it has come from Andy Saltzman Ashes podcast so no kudos if you get the answer from there) Makes a change from camel and car quiz questions Dave

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

Ok, here goes... First batsman hits a four off the first ball. He then hits three off the second ball but the umpire rules the second run was short. So he gets his century but the batsmen have changed ends and still need one to win. Second batsman hits a six off the last ball to win the match

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

Or couldn't you do it in two balls? First batsmen runs seven, one of which is called short. Batsman two hits a 6 off the next ball? Sent from my iPhone On 09/07/2013, at 23:00, markbu...@aol.com wrote: Ok, here goes... First batsman hits a four off the first ball. He then hits three off

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

How can you be run out off a 6? Sent from my iPhone On 09/07/2013, at 23:13, Ed Morrish edmorr...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't hear Zaltzman's show, but surely 6, run out (but cross over), 6? Ed. On 9 Jul 2013, at 15:35, nat...@sky.com nat...@sky.com wrote: Last 2 batsmen are both on 94

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

wouldn't work, read the question. last two batsmen. Run out would end the match Sent from my iPhone On 9 Jul 2013, at 17:17, Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com wrote: How can you be run out off a 6? Sent from my iPhone On 09/07/2013, at 23:13, Ed Morrish edmorr...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

I didn't hear Zaltzman's show, but surely 6, run out (but cross over), 6? Ed. On 9 Jul 2013, at 15:35, nat...@sky.com nat...@sky.com wrote: Last 2 batsmen are both on 94 in a one day game They need 7 to win and there are 3 balls left How can they both get a century ? Like I say it has

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

You can't be run out off a 6 anyway, surely? Sent from my iPhone On 09/07/2013, at 23:26, markbu...@aol.com wrote: wouldn't work, read the question. last two batsmen. Run out would end the match Sent from my iPhone On 9 Jul 2013, at 17:17, Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com wrote:

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

I was doing balls separated by a comma - Hit a six, next ball is run out, next ball is a six. But Mark's right, I didn't read it properly and notice the last two batsmen thing. Ed. On 9 July 2013 16:27, Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com wrote: You can't be run out off a 6 anyway, surely?

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

:59 Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast) Ok, here goes... First batsman hits a four off the first ball. He then hits three off the second ball but the umpire rules the second run was short. So he gets his century

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

(or at least the one they gave) do not not if there are any others which would work Dave From: markbu...@aol.com markbu...@aol.com To: nat...@sky.com nat...@sky.com Cc: leeds list leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 15:59 Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com Cc: leeds list leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 16:26 Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast) wouldn't work, read the question. last two batsmen. Run out would end the match Sent

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

@gn.apc.org Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 17:22 Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast) Batsman (1)  hits a six of the first ball - this takes him to 100, then the same batsman hits a single taking him to 101 in the process

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

Do you really mean the last 2 batsmen, ie there is no one left to come in? If not, then it would work this way: 1st guy hits 1st ball for 6. Then skies the next one and is caught but the batsmen cross. Then 2nd bloke hits the last ball for 6. But I am guessing that isn't going to do it, b/c the

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

can't be fucked working it out but I think it lies here: Five penalty runs are awarded to the fielding side if the batting team: Attempt to steal a run or deliberately run short Deliberately waste time after having been warned Damage the protected area of the pitch after two warnings. Dr

Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)

leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 15:59 Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to Andy Salzman Ashes podcast) Ok, here goes... First batsman hits a four off the first ball. He then hits three off the second ball but the umpire rules

Re: [LU] Cricket

Message: 3 Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 11:13:14 -0600 (MDT) From: JOHN SYKES jsy...@shaw.ca To: Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Good day for Yorkshire When I hit 75 later this year, Nice to know you're still playing cricket John, I'm just

Re: [LU] Cricket

: Monday, May 20, 2013 1:54:27 AM Subject: Re: [LU] Cricket Message: 3 Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 11:13:14 -0600 (MDT) From: JOHN SYKES jsy...@shaw.ca To: Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Good day for Yorkshire When I hit 75 later this year, Nice

Re: [LU] Cricket

There IS now... What's the score, what's the score, what's the score? Lurking again... Pete -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Robert Heath Bloody big mouth Boocock..is there an email list version of the

[LU] Cricket

Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER

[LU] Cricket

Nice to see Root digging in with Trott a pleasant end to the mum in law's funeral. Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email

Re: [LU] Cricket

Bloody big mouth Boocock..is there an email list version of the commentator,s curse? Sent from my iPad On May 18, 2013, at 5:46 PM, John Boocock swin...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Nice to see Root digging in with Trott a pleasant end to the mum in law's funeral. Sent from my BlackBerry®

Re: [LU] non LU - cricket

I could never take Boycott seriously as a Yorkshireman when he said was a Man Utd fan in a radio interview once. Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:46:04 +0100 From: david.nat...@btinternet.com To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU - cricket I can't see anything wrong with it - We

[LU] non LU - cricket

Message: 1 Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:10:36 +0100 (BST) From: DAVID NATTAN david.nat...@btinternet.com To: list leedslist leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] non LU - cricket Lancashire la la la ? - champions, champions, championsOr at least we will be in the next few minutes Oh and don't

Re: [LU] non LU - cricket

Quite bloody right! Couldn't agree more Dave. Geoff Boycott take note. BobD From: David Brennan d.r.bren...@leeds.ac.uk To: leedslist@gn.apc.org leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Friday, 16 September, 2011 11:34:00 Subject: [LU] non LU - cricket Message: 1 Date

Re: [LU] non LU - cricket

September, 2011 11:53:08 Subject: Re: [LU] non LU - cricket Quite bloody right! Couldn't agree more Dave. Geoff Boycott take note. BobD From: David Brennan d.r.bren...@leeds.ac.uk To: leedslist@gn.apc.org leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Friday, 16 September, 2011 11:34:00

Re: [LU] non LU - cricket

Lancashire la la la ? - champions, champions, championsOr at least we will be in the next few minutes Oh and don't forget the Yorkshire sheep botherers - going down, going down, going down. Get in there !!! I simply don't understand how you can be a Leeds United supporter, and yet

Re: [LU] non LU - cricket

Dave, there's something really not right about your post below Sent from my iPad On 15 Sep 2011, at 17:10, DAVID NATTAN david.nat...@btinternet.com wrote: Lancashire la la la - champions, champions, championsOr at least we will be in the next few minutes Oh and don't forget the Yorkshire

Re: [LU] non LU - cricket

and coaching staff and as for the owners Dave --- On Fri, 16/9/11, Richard Walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: From: Richard Walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk Subject: Re: [LU] non LU - cricket To: DAVID NATTAN david.nat...@btinternet.com Cc: list leedslist leedslist@gn.apc.org Date: Friday, 16

Re: [LU] non LU - cricket

To: list leedslist Subject: Re: [LU] non LU - cricket I can't see anything wrong with it - We ARE champions and Yorkshire ARE relegated. As for the how can you support Leeds United and Lancashire - to me it is only the same as our overseas fans who support LUFC and their own country

[LU] non LU - cricket - I take it back re Yorks - well one of them anyway

What a debut innings from the lad from Yorkshire - Johnny Bairstow 41 off 21 balls when the pressure was really on and it looked like we may lose, as good a debut as you will ever see in the circumstances. Dave of LEEDS UNITED !!! ___ Leedslist mailing

[LU] non LU - cricket

Lancashire la la la   - champions, champions, championsOr at least we will be in the next few minutes Oh and don't forget the Yorkshire sheep botherers - going down, going down, going down. Get in there !!! Dave ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and

Re: [LU] non LU - cricket

Fck off you tw@t. :-) Sent from my iPhone On 15 Sep 2011, at 17:10, DAVID NATTAN david.nat...@btinternet.com wrote: Lancashire la la la - champions, champions, championsOr at least we will be in the next few minutes Oh and don't forget the Yorkshire sheep botherers - going down, going

[LU] Non LU: CRICKET!!!

From the BBC online: Nicholas Green, TMS inbox: Does this mean Ireland will be now commandeering England's best players for their all conquering side? HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

Re: [LU] Non LU: CRICKET!!!

OH YES!!! Verner tHe LiTtLe YeLlOw DaFfOdIl @}-,-'-- --- On Wed, 2/3/11, McWilliams, Brendan, VF-Group (bmcwill) brendan.mcwilli...@vodafone.com wrote: From: McWilliams, Brendan, VF-Group (bmcwill) brendan.mcwilli...@vodafone.com Subject: [LU] Non LU: CRICKET!!! To: leedslist@gn.apc.org

Re: [LU] non LU cricket chant

what do the army sing to the tune of Love will tear us apart by Joy Division? Or is it just Love will tear us apart? --- On Tue, 28/12/10, Damian Walsh pussaydam...@gmail.com wrote: From: Damian Walsh pussaydam...@gmail.com Subject: [LU] non LU cricket chant To: leedslist leedslist@gn.apc.org

Re: [LU] non LU cricket chant

Swann will tear you apart what do the army sing to the tune of Love will tear us apart by Joy Division? Or is it just Love will tear us apart? ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

Re: [LU] non LU cricket chant

Mitchell Johnson is even worse than Bradley? _ From: Damian Walsh [mailto:pussaydam...@gmail.com] To: leedslist [mailto:leedsl...@gn.apc.org] Sent: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:40:31 +0100 Subject: [LU] non LU cricket chant Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the reference to the uncomplimentary

[LU] non LU cricket chant

Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the reference to the uncomplimentary chant about Johnson. Anyone know what it is? Damian ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email

Re: [LU] non LU cricket chant

Mitchell Johnson, Mitchell Johnson. Cost less than Berbatov and takes less wickets. On 28 December 2010 23:40, Damian Walsh pussaydam...@gmail.com wrote: Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the reference to the uncomplimentary chant about Johnson. Anyone know what it is? Damian

Re: [LU] non LU cricket chant

He bowls down the left He bowls down the right That boy Mitchell Johnson His bowling is shite. Ed. On 28 Dec 2010 23:40, Damian Walsh pussaydam...@gmail.com wrote: Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the reference to the uncomplimentary chant about Johnson. Anyone know what it is? Damian

Re: [LU] non LU cricket chant

That's awful. It should be *fewer*. Ed. On 28 Dec 2010 23:49, Jim Moran j...@jimmoran.co.uk wrote: Mitchell Johnson, Mitchell Johnson. Cost less than Berbatov and takes less wickets. On 28 December 2010 23:40, Damian Walsh pussaydam...@gmail.com wrote: Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the

Re: [LU] non LU cricket chant

Cost fewer than Berbatov it is. :) (I know) On 28 December 2010 23:50, Ed Morrish edmorr...@gmail.com wrote: That's awful. It should be *fewer*. Ed. On 28 Dec 2010 23:49, Jim Moran j...@jimmoran.co.uk wrote: Mitchell Johnson, Mitchell Johnson. Cost less than Berbatov and takes less

Re: [LU] non LU cricket chant

Thanks - Damian ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER

Re: [LU] non LU cricket chant

'He bowls to the left, he bowls to the right but Mitchell Johnson's bowling is shite On 28 Dec 2010, at 23:40, Damian Walsh pussaydam...@gmail.com wrote: Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the reference to the uncomplimentary chant about Johnson. Anyone know what it is? Damian

Re: [LU] Cricket

actually, I watched the real chris waddle on youtube yesterday. what a player.. they dont make them like that anymore! On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:19 PM, David Woolmer davidwool...@gmail.comwrote: Betty said... I'm looking forward to Chrissy Waddle's reports over the xmas break, just as much

Re: [LU] Cricket

and I also I stand corrected when it comes to my earlier comment about empty stands: apparently the two first days are sold out in adelaide. On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Eric B barl...@gmail.com wrote: actually, I watched the real chris waddle on youtube yesterday. what a player.. they dont

Re: [LU] NON LU Cricket

Try telling the Indians that. Anyway the few Aussies who did turn up were more interested in playing with beachballs than watching their team get slayed to all parts. They only want to watch a winning team. Matt On 30 Nov 2010, at 17:46, Eric B barl...@gmail.com wrote: its cause

[LU] NON LU Cricket

re: the lack of Aussie supporters at The Gabba. 'Day Five must be fancy dress day. The Aussies have all come as empty seats.' Betty (off to bed soon) ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

Re: [LU] Cricket

On 9 Sep 2010 at 18:56, Robert Heath wrote: Yorks are now seven points behind Notts, and must therefore win their last game against Kent at Headingley, and rely on Lancashire to do them a favour against Notts at Old Trafford. Brilliant win, but don't hold your breath about Wankyshire doing

[LU] Cricket

For Rob and other cricket lovers on the list: In case you haven't noticed the beeb are doing live text commentary on this round of the county championship games (and the last round next week as it's going to the wire). Quite entertaining it has been. Yorkshire have finished Notts off this

Re: [LU] Cricket

Yorks are now seven points behind Notts, and must therefore win their last game against Kent at Headingley, and rely on Lancashire to do them a favour against Notts at Old Trafford. Brilliant win, but don't hold your breath about Wankyshire doing us a favourthey played Notts