RE: [LegacyUG] Merging Basic Sources into Sourcewriter

2009-01-06 Thread ronald ferguson
Richard, As far as I know Legacy has not made any announcement regarding the conversion tool and I am sure they would not now ever use the word soon let alone very soon and where on earth ...a week or so came from I haven't a clue. I fear that you are unjustifiably raising expectations.

Re: [LegacyUG] Census vs Residence

2009-01-06 Thread Hope Bagot Bees
I'd go along with this - it's easy to see from the individual screen just what you do know about a person. As nearly everyone I add is long dead, their 'pattern of migration' be it from one village to another or one country to another is plain to see. Elizabeth John Roose wrote: I put census

[LegacyUG] Ibid feature and unknown spouse

2009-01-06 Thread jaemtp
Hello. I just purchased 7.0 Deluxe edition and have the most recent upgrade. Does anyone have trouble using the Ibid feature? I have a check mark in the box labled Use Ibid for Repeating Master Sources under Customize--- Sources --- Citation Formatting. It does not work. The Source citations

[LegacyUG] Sibling relationships

2009-01-06 Thread jaemtp
Hello again! Is anyone else having trouble with sibling relationships. I have three siblings in my file who were born to the same mother. The mother gave birth to a son and daughter to her first husband; and a son to her second husband. The Relationships Report incorrectly classifies the two

RE: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature and unknown spouse

2009-01-06 Thread ronald ferguson
Since the introduction of the Source Writer the use of ibid appears to have become redundant - which is a polite way of saying it no longer seems to be availanle. I also do not like the use of unknown, so what I do is create the marriage to an unknown and in Family View right click on the

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature and unknown spouse

2009-01-06 Thread Jenny M Benson
jaemtp wrote It seems that I cannot leave the name field blank, and if I enter Unknown into the Given name, it shows up on Potential Problems report along with the instructions that descriptive words that are not names should not be entered into name fields.  I love it when machines do my

[LegacyUG] Adoption and name change?

2009-01-06 Thread Kathy Cardoza
I have a child who was adopted so I used the adoption event for him. I would like to see his name shown as the NEW surname from his adopted father but with something to show his birth name. What is the best way to handle that? Also, should I just make up my own event for the adoption for

Re: [LegacyUG] Online Backup was Rel. Calc. and Back-up

2009-01-06 Thread Ann Parsons
Hello Dede, I am posting this to the list as this pertains to backing up Legacy. Your message has been a great help to me regarding backups. I looked at the Mozy website to see the cost in the event that one needed to retrieve their backup from Mozy. I could not find any mention of retrieval

Re: [LegacyUG] Merging Basic Sources into Sourcewriter

2009-01-06 Thread Brian/Support
Lew, When I tested this and reported the problem with merging basic sources into sourcewriter sources I found that the detail entries from the old style source were lost. The Basic source details were not copied to the sourcewriter template fields. Initially when you look at the source in

Re: [LegacyUG] Merging Basic Sources into Sourcewriter

2009-01-06 Thread Chick Lewis
Thank you, Brian. That's all I was asking for. Sorry if I caused any problem. Have a nice day... Lew On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Brian/Support br...@legacyfamilytree.com wrote: Lew, When I tested this and reported the problem with merging basic sources into sourcewriter sources I

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature and unknown spouse

2009-01-06 Thread jaemtp
Thank you for your replies about the Source Writer and Ibid features and also about entering unknown in name fields. I just purchased the 7.0 Deluxe edition Dec 19. So this is somewhat new to me. Your comment about the ibid feature no longer being available since the introduction of Source

RE: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature and unknown spouse

2009-01-06 Thread ronald ferguson
I cannor help re the marketing policy of Legacy, but I didn't quite say it wasn't available - it still may be for old style sources. As I see it, though, the New Source Writer has a citation for the first time a specific source is used and another for when it is used again, which is when would

[LegacyUG] FW: Printer set up

2009-01-06 Thread Laurie Hicks
Hi I had trouble with my printer and had to reinstall the printer, now when I click on view or print it tells me to define a windows printer, I click on Printer set up, up comes the name of my printer, I click Ok and goes back to the preview of print page, but it still does not work, I can

RE: [LegacyUG] FW: Printer set up

2009-01-06 Thread ronald ferguson
Laurie, Have you restarted you PC and then reopened Legacy? Ron Ferguson _ Now completely revised http://www.fergys.co.uk View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W.

RE: [LegacyUG] FW: Printer set up

2009-01-06 Thread Laurie Hicks
Hi I should have known better, thanks for your help. Regards Laurie -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of ronald ferguson Sent: Wednesday, 7 January 2009 7:51 AM To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE:

[LegacyUG] Cemetery photos

2009-01-06 Thread Gary Crull
This is from a recent thread...OK, so I'm a little slow picking up on it! ha ha Is there any indication that a photo is available using this method? The Photo Icon on the main Family screen shows when there are photos associated with the individual. This is also where I've been parking my

[LegacyUG] De or DE, Of or OF

2009-01-06 Thread Hope Bagot Bees
Just wondering what the most usual form is for old surnames. I have a number of people using either 'of ' or 'de' attached to their surname. I have been accustomed to linking this to the end of the given name rather than at the beginning of the surname. This results in mixed lists of

Re: [LegacyUG] Cemetery photos

2009-01-06 Thread Cathy Vallevieni
GC: When you enter a burial photo using the + sign in Burial section of the main screen or you add it from the picture icon as a Burial photo, it is saved in the same place, shows in both locations and changes the photo icon to half color. It just seems to be two ways to accomplish the same

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature and unknown spouse

2009-01-06 Thread Bruce McArthur
Hi It would be nice if people who, for some obsure reason, require read receipts would turn it off when posting to a group such as this, as it is intensely annoying to be asked for an acknowledgement when you are trying to quickly scan a set of emails and may not even be interested in the

Re: [LegacyUG] Cemetery photos

2009-01-06 Thread Gary Crull
Cathy, What you say is true, but. When you click on the half shaded Picture Icon on the Family page said tombstone photo does NOT appear. In my test only photos of Individuals show up when the Picture Icon is full colored. If you have 2 photos of the individual and 1 photo of the tombstone

Re: [LegacyUG] Online Backup was Rel. Calc. and Back-up

2009-01-06 Thread Joyce Herzog
My computer died in May. I had my backup on Mozy using the free program. It didn't cost me anything to retreive my files. Just took about a day to get them after I told them I wanted it. Joyce Drinkwater Herzog On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Ann Parsons aparsons2...@msn.com wrote: Hello

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature and unknown spouse

2009-01-06 Thread jaemtp
Sorry about that Bruce, that was my first message and I was using newsgroup settings. Receipts should be turned off now. - Original Message - From: Bruce McArthur bruce.mcart...@dsl.pipex.com To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 6:33 PM Subject: Re:

RE: [LegacyUG] Cemetery photos

2009-01-06 Thread M. Brenzel
But the tombstone picture does show up! You have to select Burial from the drop-down list on the right side under the Scan a Picture button. The list contains anything for the Individual that can have a picture attached to it. By default, Individual pictures are displayed. The first item in

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature and unknown spouse

2009-01-06 Thread Kris
Your email program should give you an option to deal with those automatically. It would probably be easier to change the way you do things than to try to change the way a number of other people do things. Bruce McArthur wrote: Hi It would be nice if people who, for some obsure reason,

Re: [LegacyUG] Cemetery photos

2009-01-06 Thread Cathy Vallevieni
GC: I just tried attaching a picture to an occupation and it did show up under the occupation in the pictures and next to the occupation on the report. Cathy Vallevieni Orange County At 04:24 PM 1/6/2009, you wrote: Cathy, What you say is true, but. When you click on the half shaded

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature and unknown spouse

2009-01-06 Thread Ward Walker
Is ibid not for the case where the new footnote is the same as the one immediately above it? I would think that it could co-exist with the 'subsequent citation' usage, which would cover scattered citations. However, I think both suffer from the same issue as I have discussed previously (in

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature and unknown spouse

2009-01-06 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:54:33 -0600, Kris gen.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Your email program should give you an option to deal with those automatically. It would probably be easier to change the way you do things than to try to change the way a number of other people do things. Please read

Re: [LegacyUG] Cemetery photos

2009-01-06 Thread Cathy Vallevieni
GC: You have to scan down the scroll on the right side that starts with individual until you get to burial. Any item with an * in front of it has a photo. They are grouped by category and, although I've only added Individual and Burial photos, I assume you can add photos under the other

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature and unknown spouse

2009-01-06 Thread Ward Walker
I strongly disagree. While I think asking for a read acknowledgement is rather rude, I still want the option of acknowledging receipt of e-mails from certain social or business contacts, and ignoring the request for accidental ones like in mail lists. Thus, there is no automatic solution on

RE: [LegacyUG] Cemetery photos

2009-01-06 Thread leo macdonald
GC, personally I would not place a cemetery photo in the photo gallery of the individual. I reserve this gallery for photos of the individual that are taken over a period of time from the birth of the person right up to the present day or the end of their life. But each person has a different

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature and unknown spouse

2009-01-06 Thread Elizabeth Richardson
Actually, I answer yes to those from the list. I figure if they get 40 or so receipts from people they've never heard of, turning the request off will happen sooner. Elizabeth researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson - Original Message - From: Ward Walker

[LegacyUG] BOOK

2009-01-06 Thread Momalot66
Where do I find information to help me do this . . . preview, etc. I've looked at all the tapes in Legacy 7 Deluxe. **New year...new news. Be the first to know what is making headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom0026) Legacy User Group guidelines:

Re: [LegacyUG] Sibling relationships

2009-01-06 Thread The Mathesons
Hi Reg and others annoyed by requests for read receipts, Does your email program have an option that allows you to ignore (or never return) read receipts. If you switch this option on you will never agian be annoyed by requests for read receipts. Jennie Matheson - Original Message -

RE: [LegacyUG] Sibling relationships

2009-01-06 Thread Famhobby
Why is the solution always something other than simply following the list rules? Every time someone raises the issue of list rules being broken, the discussion quickly turns to something everyone else on the list can do to cope with it. And usually the person raising the issue becomes the

RE: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature and unknown spouse

2009-01-06 Thread Wynthner
Ibid should ONLY used if the source IMMEDIATELY preceding it is exactly the same in ALL respects. If there is an intervening source other standards apply. --- On Tue, 1/6/09, ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com wrote: From: ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature

Re: [LegacyUG] Sibling relationships

2009-01-06 Thread John S. Adams
Because it is much, much, much easier to modify your e-mail environment than to control the behavior of hundreds of strangers. -- From: Famhobby famho...@comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 7:38 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com

Re: [LegacyUG] Sibling relationships

2009-01-06 Thread The Mathesons
And perhaps the person raising the issue becomes the villian because they do not follow etiquette by raising the issue privately with the person breaking the rules, but rather make a big issue by raising it via the list. Jennie - Original Message - From: Famhobby famho...@comcast.net

Re: [LegacyUG] Sibling relationships

2009-01-06 Thread Art Seddon
And every time somebody breaks a rule I have to delete 99 message belly-aching about it. Art Seddon - Original Message - From: Famhobby To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 7:38 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Sibling relationships Why

Re: [LegacyUG] Sibling relationships

2009-01-06 Thread Gary Templeman
Except that some of us correspond with other people (not this list) such as employers, or co-workers working on a project, where we WANT to respond positively to certain read receipt requests. Turning it off globally at our end means we do not recieve them at all. The sender on the other hand,

Re: [LegacyUG] BOOK

2009-01-06 Thread John S. Adams
Huh? -- From: momalo...@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 5:54 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] BOOK Where do I find information to help me do this . . . preview, etc. I've looked at all the tapes in Legacy