Do you mean the + sign that indicates there's more than one relationship?
-
JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www.jgen.ws/jlog
Jim Smith wrote:
Dede,
Everything you mention makes sense, and I see those symbols as indicated in
the Family View. But it's the +
Ange,
I am having difficulty in picturing this as I cannot really see what you are
trying to do and why.
However, let us take the first bit:
Individual with the surname of Smith
OR
Individual with the spouse surname of Smith
AND
Tag 1 equal to untag
The 3rd condition only operates on the
Richard,
I was tied up for much of yesterday and haven't had chance to play - will have
a look later today.
Ron Ferguson
_
*New* Improved Interface for OpenOffice.org Contacts Database
http://www.fergys.co.uk
View the
Certainly appreciate your answer, but I could thick and missing something.
I understand your technical explanation as to upwards and downwards
direction relationships and the use of the + and - symbols outside of
Legacy.
Actually I think I was wrong and I apologise for any confusion I may
Cathy Vallevieni wrote:
I have a family that adopted one child. I entered an event of
adoption for the child. I changed the Child Status to Adopted for
both the mother and father relationships. They have two younger
children that are natural.
The following reports all have a statement
Jim,
I see what you're talking about. I agree with JL. It means that
there is more than one relationship. I have a cousin who is married
to someone who is also her fourth cousin and her fifth cousin. (She's
only married to one man - we just have ancestors who married cousins
more than once!)
Hi Jim,
I was still with version .76 so I updated to .86 My third option still says
view additional relationships and as you said it brings up the
relationship calculator.
I am not sure why it is not picking up on the relationship for both John and
Rose. Is one of the relationship based on
Hi,
I have a family branch whose name was constantly misspelled in the census
records. I am trying to generate a handy report to show everyone with that
last name and which census records I do have so I can focus on the ones that
I am missing without having to pull up 200 individuals.
I have
I set up a test file to check this. Here is what I found. Rose has the +
sign because her relationships are calculated as:
1. 1st cousin 3 times removed
2. wife of 1st cousin 3 times removed (this is a relationship by
marriage not blood)
John only has the relationship
1. 1st cousin 3 times
Thanks, Brian, JL, Ange, Dede, and Jenny,
Do you mean the + sign that indicates there's more than one relationship?
I had to plot it out. I said I was a bit dense at times...
John's father, Joe, is Rose's mother, Louisa's, brother. Hence, Joe's and
Louisa's parents are John's and Rose's
Hi Allen
Of course! Thanks for reminding me! I must have been a little brain
dead to have forgotten that tidbit, LOL. I just have never used it We
share on our home network of 4 Macs and one WinXP and I sync up to
the cloud. I backup to Time Capsule daily and monthly to a separate
Jim,
Yes it is that simple. The + sign beside a relationship in that area
above a person's name means there is more than one. If you right click
on someone with a + sign you will see the option to view additional
relationships for THAT person. The reason you did not see that choice
with John
Ange,
I am wondering if there is a bug here, and I wonder if you would try something
for me. In OptionsGeneral would you change the Tags to show to 4,5,6 and let
me know what happens when you print.
It will take me a while to reproduce what you are doing, otherwise I would look
for myself.
Angela,
Go to Options Customize General
In the Tagging options click on the tags to show button and change those
to include at least one of the custom tags you want in the report. On
the Report Row 1 screen ensure that that number is also selected. If
tags to show are the default 1, 2, and
Thanks Brian and Ron,
With going to options and changing the tags I want to show to 4-6 they do
show up on the report. I can just print that report and go back to change
the tags to 7-9 and get the others. It is not one neat report but it gets
the job done.
Thanks,
Ange
-Original
Jenny:
Oops! In researching your question, I realized that comment was
something I wrote in his Notes. Apparently someone once told me he
adopted two children and I didn't remember putting that note in his
Notes. Sorry! Thanks for the question, though, as I probably
would not have
My thanks to Kathy for introducing us to Dropbox. I have been using a
shared folder across my computers and that works great. But with
Dropbox, essentially it is not a shared folder but a live file so
everything works faster. I still back up to my Shared Folder so that
Mac can save to Time
Can I put in a plea here for a small adjustment to the screen so that
ALL the taps can be shown at once - I gather the request has been
submitted by several other people.
It really would be a great help as otherwise, when using complicated
tagging, you have to repeatedly run searches to find out
I am sorry to report it was asked for in L5, and we were told that it was a
'footprint' problem.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Mon, 2/9/09, Elizabeth roobee...@googlemail.com wrote:
From: Elizabeth roobee...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] search index report problem
To:
Jim
You're welcome! I'm glad I could be of help.
Kathy
On Feb 9, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Jim Winfrey wrote:
My thanks to Kathy for introducing us to Dropbox. I have been using a
shared folder across my computers and that works great. But with
Dropbox, essentially it is not a shared folder but a
Brian,
I wonder if you could take a further look at this question. I have been trying
to use Advanced Tagging on Tag 4 with only tags, 1, 2, and 3 showing (this was
in connection with Richard's mitochodrial question) and found that tags which
are not showing cannot be set. Is this how it
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:51:38 +, ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com
wrote:
I have been trying to use Advanced Tagging on Tag 4 with only tags, 1, 2, and
3 showing (this was in connection with Richard's mitochodrial question) and
found that tags which are not showing cannot be set. Is this how
The alternate name appears in my Index of Names in the Modifed Descendant
report.
It has a prefex of ~ so that you know it is an alternate name.
I am using Legacy 7.0.0.86 - the latest build.
You do have to choose to include alternate names in the Index option in the
Descendant Report window.
Dennis,
A straight forward tagging of a list of people compiled from a Detailed Search,
something which, as you know, should not be a problem at all.
Ron Ferguson
_
*New* Improved Interface for OpenOffice.org Contacts
Win Zip has been downloaded . . . the free version. It says to get a
evaluation and registration number, I would need to buy a full version??? I
cannot
remember how this works. I think I had Win Zip years ago??? Anybody know?
and now I want to restore a file and multimedia file from
I do not believe you NEED WINZIP - anything since XP has a built-in
UNZIPPER program. Second - you do NOT need to UNZIP to RESTORE.
The RESTORE a BACKUP - open LEGACY - Choose File - RESTORE. It will
tell you it must stop LEGACY - that is OK. Choose the BACKUP FILE you
want (if from your flash
For lack of a better word, a son has a father, and the son is then father,
and it keeps going around and around??? How do I fix it? What do you call
it???
**The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy
Awards. AOL Music takes you there.
My font size on Notes used to be 20 so I could see it. Now, in having a new
hard drive, it seems to go to 10 or smaller. How do I change it back? I
cannot remember.
**The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy
Awards. AOL Music takes you there.
28 matches
Mail list logo
