Russ,
Of course it is, but the question which was asked had nothing to do with
sourcing, but how, and/or whether, to include persons of unproven
relationships into the Legacy database - especially if there were multiple
possibilities. In my original response I simply said that one should not.
I have a situation where we know by DNA results we match a particular family
line, but even having hired a researcher we've not been able to prove our
grandfather, and may never, a great possibility exist that it is a certain
person, so I use Possibly with the person's name. I list the
The Children Settings can be sourced which means that the link between parent
and child can be sourced. Add a status Relationship Not Proven to any of the
three status lists (Child Status, Relationship to Father, Relationship to
Mother) and then add a master source Relationship Not Proven.
I agree with Russ, one should NOT include any of this. As we know there is
always Black sheep in every family and a lot of families do not like these
things that MAY be true be known. I would say that in some cases this could
open the doors for some legal action.
Thanks,
David C Abernathy
Hi
*.LWC = Legacy Charting chart file
Tim
On 8/10/2011 8:14 AM, David C Abernathy wrote:
What program are you using these LWC files with?
How do you get them?
Thanks,
David C Abernathy
Email disclaimers
This
View Scrapbook Print Multimedia List is the closest you can get to
the list you want.
It will print a list of all linked multimedia files sorted by location
indicating who the picture is linked to and which Picture Gallery.
You have several options on the Multimedia List Options window for
On 8/10/2011 11:10 AM, Sherry/Support wrote:
View Scrapbook Print Multimedia List is the closest you can get to
the list you want.
It will print a list of all linked multimedia files sorted by location
indicating who the picture is linked to and which Picture Gallery.
You have several
*This is off topic, sorry. I just visited the Legacy Facebook page, and
there is a polite warning about Facebook archiving all groups created using
the old groups format. They say when this group is archived, its wall posts,
photos and discussion threads will move to the new groups format, and
Are you sure you were on the right page? There are other pages with
the name Legacy Family Tree
Our page is at http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree?sk=wall and I
don't see anything about archiving there.
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:40
Sherry,
There are two Facebook sites for Legacy, one for the organisation, which you
quote, and also Legacy Family Tree Group at
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=23021903897 to which Robert refers.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: Sherry/Support
Sent:
*Sherry, I will send a screen shot showing the message and URL both. Then we
can go from there. Maybe I was at the wrong one.
Thanks.
Robert
*
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Sherry/Support she...@legacyfamilytree.com
wrote:
Are you sure you were on the right page? There are other pages with
Sherry,
Robert was not talking about the Legacy Family Tree PAGE on facebook.
Rather he is talking about the Legacy 7.0 Family Tree GROUP on facebook.
It can be found at http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=23021903897 . The
contact info shown is Legacy and the group admin is Linda Robins
The only one I knew about was the one set up by us
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Don Varner donvarn...@gmail.com wrote:
Sherry,
Robert was not talking about the Legacy Family Tree PAGE on facebook.
Rather he is talking about
*I *thought* the one I referred to was set up by Millennia. I didn't realize
there was another site. Apologies to Sherry, and thanks for everyone else
for helping me out. I will join the official one right now.
Thank you.
Robert
*
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Sherry/Support
To each his own, I suppose, but I would think entering multiple people as AKAs
would only serve to confuse things.
There are several men named Hancock living in the same vicinity in southern
Illinois. I have no idea which one (if any of them) is the father of my
gggrandmother. The only way
Connie,
I would enter (as in your example) John as the primary...and then add
William as an AKA and then Benjamin as an AKA.
This method started when I was researching family members with very
sketchy information which led to muliple candidates. Having unlinked
individuals simply did not work for
Hi Sherry,
1. I do have the latest build
2. I reset the report as instructed and that creates a one page report with no
issues.
I went to report options, in the Pictures tab, I checked Picture of Main
Person. No problem with that report, even though it was still a one page
report. Next
So what would you do with Benjamin census records, or William's will? Put them
all under John's name? Or how about you find out Benjamin was William's
brother and the names of William's children, but you still don't know who John
and Benjamin's children were? Or you have only the names of
I do as Ron describes, and it works for me. When printing an Individual
Report for the mother, the kids with unproven father's show up as Jane
(1901-1988) (father: unproven) (mother) with supersripts for source
citations next to mother and father. It serves my purposes.
Jean
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011
19 matches
Mail list logo
