On 10/01/2012 23:17, Kathy Jones wrote:
I have two questions and probably I should send two separate e-mails but
I will number them.
1.I have two different types of census sources for several people for
one year – e.g. 1901 census – one is erroneously shown as a census form
a book and
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:37:16 +, Jenny M Benson
ge...@cedarbank.me.uk wrote:
Dennis will be along
in a minute to tell you if Ltools will do that (I know it works for
combining Basic and SW Sources.)
It won't.
--
Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming)
I should make it clear that backup as been done in all three ways not a choice
of methods.
Carol
From: crbrassfi...@hotmail.com
To: legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com
Subject: MISSING MULTIMEDIA FILES
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:09:29 +
Hi
I have a new laptop and am trying to transfer
On 2012/01/11 14:09, cr brassfield wrote:
I can load all the text files with no apparent omissions, however the
multimedia
files are missing.
Normally when I open a file any multimedia opens automatically.
I always backup when closing down.
The multimedia files do appear as files when I
1. - I think the real question here is what's the best way to fix a
source? If it is just one source on one fact for one person, deleting
and recreating is probably the best. But if it is a source used by many
facts and/or by many people, just finding all the entries that need
fixing could be a
On 11/01/2012 13:27, Robert57P_gmail wrote:
For place names, we can change a misspelling in the master location
list and the fix is now reflected on all people that used it. Is
there something similar than can be done for a source - fix it once and
have the change reflected for everyone?Â
I don't know whether this applies only to the UK or also to other countries.
Many of the locations in my family tree come from the General Registry
Office indexes of Births, Marriages and Deaths; these locations identify
only the Registration Districts which have names usually based on one town
John,
In a nutshell no, although I write RD (Registration District) in full to
avoid confusion with Rural District.
Your best bet is to take the birth place from a census, or get the
certificate.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: John Clifford
Sent:
Just a possible idea, but if you just put the city name in the location field
and RD in the adjacent note field, the geo codes should be found. Once they
are found, you could move RD back to the location field. Jerry
Ron Ferguson ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
John,
In a nutshell no,
On 11/01/2012 11:59, John Clifford wrote:
I don't know whether this applies only to the UK or also to other countries.
Many of the locations in my family tree come from the General Registry
Office indexes of Births, Marriages and Deaths; these locations identify
only the Registration
Jerry,
I think I see what you mean, but the names of registration districts may not
relate to anything so simple, for example West Ward in Westmorland. The
districts often cover quite large areas and encompass several towns, many
also include sub-districts.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
Kathy, To take care of #1 manually, here's what I generally do:
Find the WRONG source in the Master Source list and highlight it.
Click on Show List to get all the Individuals currently citing that Source.
Select a Tag number you are not already using and click on 'Tag Everyone in
List'.
Get out
I hope this isn't considered off topic as this is to use with Legacy.
Anyone using Find a Grave for Legacy?? I am trying but it seems as if your
names must follow strict guidelines. In my database I have added a comment
in the suffix field for some. Such as wife of if I don't have a last
name.
Sheila,
This is the kind of thing that can happen when you use a Legacy field for
something for which it is not intended. I don’t know how it might affect your
reports, but using third party software and some of the features in Legacy will
be impacted. A big part of my research is done
I understand why Sheila does what she does, but I put the Wife of
etc. in the name field itself, not the suffix field. I detest putting
the word unknown in the name field because I want to provide a snippet
of whatever is known about the person. However, I can see the
possibility it might
15 matches
Mail list logo
