Re: [LegacyUG] Design question on trees

2013-11-15 Thread Paula Ryburn
From: Chuck Sechler csech...@att.net To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 6:55 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] Design question on trees I have an ancestor I have done a tree for with Legacy and I followed only male lines down. If a female married into another

[LegacyUG] Design question on trees

2013-10-26 Thread Chuck Sechler
I have an ancestor I have done a tree for with Legacy and I followed only male lines down. If a female married into another family name, the tree stopped for her line. so, I have one “origin”, the first person I have recorded in my family. But, if I were to follow all female lines down I would

RE: [LegacyUG] Design question on trees

2013-10-26 Thread Ron Ferguson
Chuck, I am not at all clear as to what you mean when referring to the female tree. This may be because I tend to think in terms of mtDNA when considering a female tree. In my scenario the female line is always passed from mother to daughter down the line. Which is why I cannot see why you

Re: [LegacyUG] Design question on trees

2013-10-26 Thread Chuck Sechler
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Design question on trees Chuck, I am not at all clear as to what you mean when referring to the female tree. This may be because I tend to think in terms of mtDNA when considering a female tree. In my scenario the female line is always passed from mother to daughter down

Re: [LegacyUG] Design question on trees

2013-10-26 Thread singhals
Chuck Sechler wrote: I have an ancestor I have done a tree for with Legacy and I followed only male lines down. If a female married into another family name, the tree stopped for her line. so, I have one “origin”, the first person I have recorded in my family. But, if I were to follow all