, 2010 5:23 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] How to enter an unnamed child
Mike stated, If the child didn't live long enough to be named, then it
certainly couldn't have been an ancestor of you or anyone :-)
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http
On 2010/02/03 11:18, Lionel Carter wrote:
It is interesting that no one has pointed out some people are interested
in tracing their family history rather than just their ancestors.
If you don't note people without descendants you presumably omit all
spinsters.
No, I record them all, they're
, February 03, 2010 1:18 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] How to enter an unnamed child
It is interesting that no one has pointed out some people are
interested
in tracing their family history rather than just their ancestors.
If you don't note people without
From: CE Wood wood...@msn.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Wed, February 3, 2010 11:35:42 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] How to enter an unnamed child
Exactly, Mike.
I am sure most people, like me, are interested in ancestral relatives. My
passion
We all have reasons and preferences for doing genealogy. As CE states,
his/her passion is history.
I believe that brothers and sisters, aunts and uncles and etc, all had
influences and sometimes great impact on our direct ancestors. Why would you
not want to include these people? Clues about
See below.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Bruce Jones juicebo...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems we are missing the point. I don't think ANYONE is suggesting
that we not include ancestral relatives; they just don't think we
should CALL them ANCESTORS instead of ancestral relatives.
Correct.
I found a newspaper clipping for an ancestor who didn't live long enough
to be named and would like to show them in the list of brothers and
sisters. How is this done?
Helen
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
Huh?
--
I found a newspaper clipping for an ancestor who didn't live long enough
to be named
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
In doing transcribing for both Ancestry and Family Search, I have found
children several years old still named Baby.
Marilyn
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:08 PM, John S. Adams oldbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Huh?
--
I found a newspaper clipping for
On 2010/02/02 21:49, ci...@treadles.ca wrote:
I found a newspaper clipping for an ancestor who didn't live long enough
to be named and would like to show them in the list of brothers and
sisters. How is this done?
I know what you want to do, but, as John Adams says, 'Huh?'
If the child didn't
:40 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] How to enter an unnamed child
On 2010/02/02 21:49, ci...@treadles.ca wrote:
I found a newspaper clipping for an ancestor who didn't live long
enough
to be named and would like to show them in the list of brothers
to enter an unnamed child
I found a newspaper clipping for an ancestor who didn't live long enough
to be named and would like to show them in the list of brothers and
sisters. How is this done?
Helen
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] How to enter an unnamed child
Continuing the discussion.I've often wondered why these families back then
took so long to decide upon a given name whereas today the babies are often
named long before birth (perhaps as early as a short while after
Mike stated, If the child didn't live long enough to be named, then it
certainly couldn't have been an ancestor of you or anyone :-)
That is absolutely not true Mike. Ever heard of a stillborn child? My
grandmother had three of them, and only two of them were named, twin
Abeare's. That was it.
Obviously a child who died very young, maybe within a day or two of birth.
Elizabeth C
John S. Adams wrote:
Huh?
--
I found a newspaper clipping for an ancestor who didn't live long enough
to be named
Legacy User Group
On 2010/02/03 03:23, Marvin Angelique Welch wrote:
Mike stated, If the child didn't live long enough to be named, then it
certainly couldn't have been an ancestor of you or anyone :-)
That is absolutely not true Mike. Ever heard of a stillborn child? My
grandmother had three of them, and
The mix-up is in wording the definition of ancestor. You would be
right to say that the child would not be an ancestor in the defined
sense of the word (such as a remote grandparent). However, there is
still a genetic relationship so many still call them ancestors. So, my
unnamed Aunts and Uncles
--
From: ci...@treadles.ca
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 11:49 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] How to enter an unnamed child
I found a newspaper clipping for an ancestor who didn't live long enough
to be named and would like
--
From: ci...@treadles.ca
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 11:49 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] How to enter an unnamed child
I found a newspaper clipping for an ancestor who didn't live long enough
to be named and would like
19 matches
Mail list logo
