Re: [LegacyUG] Questionable Locations

2010-11-11 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 11/11/2010 04:47, RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote: I don't. For some people I use England, or Illinois, or USA or a county, if that is the smallest location I am sure of. I put the 'correct' commas in, since reports can remove the extras. This way all my 'incompletes' end up clumped at the front

Re: [LegacyUG] Questionable Locations

2010-11-11 Thread Mike Fry
On 2010/11/11 11:52, Jenny M Benson wrote: On 11/11/2010 04:47, RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote: I don't. For some people I use England, or Illinois, or USA or a county, if that is the smallest location I am sure of. I put the 'correct' commas in, since reports can remove the extras. This way all

Re: [LegacyUG] Questionable Locations

2010-11-11 Thread Scott Hall
I track all of that information in the Research notes.  If a place is uncertain, I usually will not include it in the Location field, or will include the higher level jurisdiction (e.g. a source says Philadelphia?, PA -- I would put Pennsylvania in the field, and record that the source said

Re: [LegacyUG] Questionable Locations

2010-11-11 Thread John S. Adams
-- From: Mike Fry mike...@iafrica.com Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 3:20 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Questionable Locations On 2010/11/11 11:52, Jenny M Benson wrote: On 11/11/2010 04:47, RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote: I don't. For some