From: Kurt Kneeland kurt-kneel...@sbcglobal.net
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 9:28 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] US census master source
I treat the 1880 US Federal Census as a single master source entity, but
consider the different
...@legacyfamilytree.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 6:52 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] US census master source
This goes back to preferring to be a lumper or a splitter. It really is
personal preference. I like to have my citations mirror the ones in Evidence
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] US census master source
I treat the 1880 US Federal Census as a single master source entity, but
consider the different indexes (Ancestry vs Family Search vs others) as
separate master source entities. I put the state and county info
: Sunday, November 24, 2013 10:29 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] US census master source
I treat the 1880 US Federal Census as a single master source entity, but
consider the different indexes (Ancestry vs Family Search vs
Maureen,
This is not as straightforward a subject as might be supposed, it is even
possible that there are as many answers as Legacy users!!??
I would suggest reading the LUG archives first (URL at the end of each message)
and search for Sources Lumpers quotes not needed, and then come back to
I treat the 1880 US Federal Census as a single master source entity, but
consider the different indexes (Ancestry vs Family Search vs others) as
separate master source entities. I put the state and county info with the
other detail info.
-Original Message-
From: Maureen Lake
6 matches
Mail list logo
