Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]

2013-12-05 Thread Ward Walker
.) Ward From: Alan Pereira Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:03 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events] John I happened to be one person who had to resolve database nulls when linked

Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]

2013-12-05 Thread John B. Lisle
Alan, Thank you for this sharing. I am not in Support. Although I am a tester for Legacy, I am first and foremost a user, like yourself. I do not know the particulars of most of the support issues unless they are elevated to the Test group for testing - or for testing a fix. I have a personal

RE: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]

2013-12-05 Thread Gavin Nicholson
2013 5:08 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events] There have been several LUG discussions about this. When Legacy formats source citation output from a template-based source, in many cases

Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]

2013-12-05 Thread Jay 1FamilyTree
, 6 December 2013 5:08 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events] There have been several LUG discussions about this. When Legacy formats source citation output from a template-based

RE: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]

2013-12-05 Thread Gavin Nicholson
: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events] Gavin, If you could include the lines from your gedcom that relate to this person and the source, then maybe a proper explanation can be given. But without knowing whats in the gedcom its just a guess as to how/why. Jay Legacy User

Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]

2013-12-05 Thread Jay 1FamilyTree
2012. Thoughts, Gavin... From: Jay 1FamilyTree [mailto:1familytree@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 6 December 2013 9:16 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events] Gavin, If you

RE: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]

2013-12-05 Thread Gavin Nicholson
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events] [snip] Looks like the gedcom output is doing what is expected of it. Jay Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]

2013-12-05 Thread Jay 1FamilyTree
in the program. Gavin... *From:* Jay 1FamilyTree [mailto:1familytree@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, 6 December 2013 12:04 PM *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com *Subject:* Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events] [snip

RE: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]

2013-12-05 Thread Gavin Nicholson
Subject: Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events] But then it wouldn't be compliant with Gedcom standard Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http