[LegacyUG] testing
Test --- L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Re: [LegacyUG] testing
Lis has already been removed from the list. Brian Customer Support Millennia Corporation br...@legacyfamilytree.com http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com On 17/03/2016 03:44, Charlene C wrote: If you click to the unsubscribe link and scroll to the very bottom you'll find the email address for the list administrators. They can help you. On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Lis B. Jensen> wrote: HI Please unsubsribe me from Legacy User Group - I have tried from the link - but it do not work for me Hilsen Lis B. Jensen -- ___ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Re: [LegacyUG] testing
If you click to the unsubscribe link and scroll to the very bottom you'll find the email address for the list administrators. They can help you. On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Lis B. Jensenwrote: > HI Please unsubsribe me from Legacy User Group - I have tried from the > link - but it do not work for me > > Hilsen > Lis B. Jensen > > 2016-03-14 17:37 GMT+01:00 Brian/Support : > >> I just checked and you are subscribed. Have you checked your spam folders >> for the password reminder message? >> >> Brian >> Customer Support >> Millennia Corporation >> br...@legacyfamilytree.com >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com >> >> On 14/03/2016 11:48, Hannigan Family Research wrote: >> >>> I have tried to use the link to get my password so that I can check my >>> settings. I have done this twice and nothing has shown up in my email. >>> Does this mean that I have been unsubscribed from the list and am still >>> receiving emails? >>> >> >> -- >> ___ >> LegacyUserGroup mailing list >> LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com >> To manage your subscription and unsubscribe >> http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com >> > > > -- > ___ > LegacyUserGroup mailing list > LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com > To manage your subscription and unsubscribe > http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com > > -- ___ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Re: [LegacyUG] testing
HI Please unsubsribe me from Legacy User Group - I have tried from the link - but it do not work for me Hilsen Lis B. Jensen 2016-03-14 17:37 GMT+01:00 Brian/Support: > I just checked and you are subscribed. Have you checked your spam folders > for the password reminder message? > > Brian > Customer Support > Millennia Corporation > br...@legacyfamilytree.com > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com > > On 14/03/2016 11:48, Hannigan Family Research wrote: > >> I have tried to use the link to get my password so that I can check my >> settings. I have done this twice and nothing has shown up in my email. >> Does this mean that I have been unsubscribed from the list and am still >> receiving emails? >> > > -- > ___ > LegacyUserGroup mailing list > LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com > To manage your subscription and unsubscribe > http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com > -- ___ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Re: [LegacyUG] testing
I just checked and you are subscribed. Have you checked your spam folders for the password reminder message? Brian Customer Support Millennia Corporation br...@legacyfamilytree.com http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com On 14/03/2016 11:48, Hannigan Family Research wrote: I have tried to use the link to get my password so that I can check my settings. I have done this twice and nothing has shown up in my email. Does this mean that I have been unsubscribed from the list and am still receiving emails? -- ___ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Re: [LegacyUG] testing
I have tried to use the link to get my password so that I can check my settings. I have done this twice and nothing has shown up in my email. Does this mean that I have been unsubscribed from the list and am still receiving emails? On Monday 3 14 2016 9:28 AM, Brian/Support wrote: Not all users will see their own posts to the list. gmail.com is an ISP that does not show the users own posts to mailing lists and perhaps your ISP xtra.co.nz is the same. There is a setting on your account page which will tell the list to send you an acknowledgment of your posts when they are received. This will at least let you know the message was received. Use the link in your welcome message to go to your account management page. Scroll down until you see the settings for your posts to the lists: Receive your own posts to the list? If this is set to No change it to Yes, if it is already Yes then change the next setting: Receive acknowledgement mail when you send mail to the list?, Click on the Yes option and the list will acknowledge your postings. Note this will not include your post just a notice that the post was received by the list. Brian Customer Support Millennia Corporation br...@legacyfamilytree.com http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com On 14/03/2016 01:49, Gracie Burton wrote: Testing I have already sent an email to the list - it is nor showing up Thanks Gracie -- ___ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Re: [LegacyUG] testing
Not all users will see their own posts to the list. gmail.com is an ISP that does not show the users own posts to mailing lists and perhaps your ISP xtra.co.nz is the same. There is a setting on your account page which will tell the list to send you an acknowledgment of your posts when they are received. This will at least let you know the message was received. Use the link in your welcome message to go to your account management page. Scroll down until you see the settings for your posts to the lists: Receive your own posts to the list? If this is set to No change it to Yes, if it is already Yes then change the next setting: Receive acknowledgement mail when you send mail to the list?, Click on the Yes option and the list will acknowledge your postings. Note this will not include your post just a notice that the post was received by the list. Brian Customer Support Millennia Corporation br...@legacyfamilytree.com http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com On 14/03/2016 01:49, Gracie Burton wrote: Testing I have already sent an email to the list - it is nor showing up Thanks Gracie -- ___ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Re: [LegacyUG] testing
On 23 Feb 2016 at 12:57, Sharon Blair wrote: > just testing to see what happens > > What happened was that you sent a message to the Legacy user mailing list, and I was one of those who received it. I am replying to let you know what happened. -- Keep well, Steve Hayes Blog:http://hayesgreene.wordpress.com Web:http://www.khanya.org.za/famhist1.htm E-mail: sha...@dunelm.org.uk ___ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Re: [LegacyUG] testing
It's an email list...everyone got the email...maybe testing to see if they are subscribed... Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 4, an AT 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Linda Greethurst <llg...@gmail.com> Date: 2/23/2016 3:35 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Mailing List for users of Legacy Family Tree software <legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] testing I got it - what are you testing? On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Sharon Blair <slblair2...@live.com> wrote: just testing to see what happens ___ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com ___ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Re: [LegacyUG] testing
I got it - what are you testing? On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Sharon Blairwrote: > just testing to see what happens > > > > ___ > LegacyUserGroup mailing list > LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com > http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com > > ___ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
[LegacyUG] testing
just testing to see what happens ___ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Re: [LegacyUG] testing
Welcome jo poi to the Legacy Family Tree Software users group! Elizabeth Living in Illinois but Born in Alabama! On 9/27/2015 3:01 PM, jo poi wrote: Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] testing
Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
Evert, (re: Legacy Gedcoms imported to TNG) I have a mod that is not yet publicly available that makes it easier for me to import a gedcom with many media links, by 'forcing' the media into collections based on folder names and structure. Anything in the Document folder is a Document anything in the Census folder is a Census anything in the Photo folder is a Photo. The collection Name must exactly match the folder name. This way I do not have to convert the many media items into their proper collections after a gedcom import. It also has some other functions which need to be stripped out before it would be useful to all. Let me know if that would help you and we can email direct. Hope that helps Jay On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Evert van Dijken evert...@gmail.com wrote: John, Could you give an example of a TNG mod that makes it easier to import legacy gedcoms? I couldn't find any on the wiki page: http://tng.lythgoes.net/wiki/index.php/Category:Mods_for_TNG_v10 Also looked for gedcom in previous builds. Could you give a direct link? Evert 2015-04-15 8:04 GMT+02:00 John Lisle leg...@johnlisle.com: Stuart, You point out an import issue with TNG and webtrees. The product source for both is available for users to inspect and edit. As a programmer, early on I made a number of mods to TNG and soon discovered that I needed to spend too much time each new update to TNG to re-develop those mods for the new release. A couple of years ago, TNG introduced something they call the mod manager. This is a way to create a mod and then have TNG install it. There is now a large catalog of these mods available, most of which need to be tweaked each time an update is prepared. Some of these mods were developed specifically to make it easier to improve how Legacy Gedcoms are imported. Does webtrees have a similar facility? However, once you lock yourself into some of these mods, you may find that you will need help if the developer is no longer maintaining them. john. At 09:00 PM 4/14/2015, Stuart Gregory wrote: Hi Barton, John and other interested people Happy to provide the link but I would like to make a couple of comments. I am currently not using the latest version of webtrees. One of the reasons for this is that I have made some minor modifications to the underlying PHP code and for me to upgrade requires a little work on my part. I host the site on my own web server which is located under my desk in my home and apart from some minor problems (bugs) there is no pressure for me to upgrade. The link to my site is: http://stuart.scss.dyndns.info/FamilyTree/ If you are seriously considering making your Legacy data available on-line, you should look at webtrees more closely. A number of the developers of webtrees offer hosting services (for a fee), but they all provide good support. The software is open source and therefore free. I would recommend that you have a look at the webtrees site here: http://www.webtrees.net/index.php/en/ If you visit this site you will find links to various other sites using webtrees. There are different modules available, some of which radically change the look of the site, but the underlying software and data remains the same. That is, some of the developers have created their own CSS files to present the same information but in a different format. Some final comments. As has already been explained in an earlier post. Legacy creates static web pages and for me, this means thousands of files would need to be uploaded to the web server each time I need to update the web site. Webtrees allows me to enter data directly on my web site and that data is immediately available for everyone to see. Comments regarding the chance of losing data when using TNG or webtrees is a valid comment. But both of these products provide safeguards. One safeguard is for you to implement a setting so that you, as administrator of the site, are the only person who can approve changes or additions to the data. There is no loss of value of having a search engine document your site. In fact tools are provided to enhance the search engine function. Hope this is of value to you. Stuart -Original Message- From: BARTON LEWIS [mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net] Sent: Wednesday, 15 April 2015 12:23 AM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Stuart, is it possible to see a tree generated by wbtrees - yours, perhaps? Thanks, Barton On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:16 AM, Stuart Gregory wrote: For Barton, John and others interested, The open source PHPGedview has not been actively supported for a number of years since the main developer and a lot of others moved to create webtrees. I would definitely not recommend using PHPGedview. Webtrees is open source and therefore free, unlike TNG (The Next Generation). I have
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Stuart, is it possible to see a tree generated by wbtrees - yours, perhaps? Thanks, Barton  On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:16 AM, Stuart Gregory wrote:  For Barton, John and others interested, The open source PHPGedview has not been actively supported for a number of years since the main developer and a lot of others moved to create webtrees. I would definitely not recommend using PHPGedview. Webtrees is open source and therefore free, unlike TNG (The Next Generation). I have been a user of Legacy and webtrees for many years and PHPGedview for several years prior to moving to webtrees. For many years my webtrees site has been my prime database and I occasionally export a Gedcom from my site and create a new Legacy .fdb file so as to create reports that aren't available using webtrees. Although I back up my MySQL database every night, creating a new Legacy .fdb is another form of backup. Stuart -Original Message- From: John Lisle [ mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com] Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2015 1:39 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them will be small and, as a result, consume large amounts of hosting space. In the late 1990s, a program was created called IGM by Randy Winch. The idea behind IGM was that you uploaded your Gedcom file to your hosting service along with the IGM software and had IGM process your Gedcom and allow you to have IGM create your web pages dynamically as visitors requested them. Randy enhanced IGM for RootsWeb and that is what RootsWeb's WorldConnect service is using. In the early 2000s, two software products were created to take the IGM experience to a higher level. They have the limitation that the hosting service has to support php scripting MySQL databases that not all free or cable company hosting provides. They also expect the user to have, or have access to, some basic webmastering skills. Both require a quality hosting service and for you to acquire a domain name for your site. One is the OpenSource product phpGedView. This has the advantage that it is free. It is also slow. The other is the commercial product TNG. License cost is minor, and based on personal experience, the visitor experience is far superior and the customization tools provided by the vendor are effective and fairly easy to use. Further, it is the closest in data model to Legacy. Not identical, but most of your Legacy data can be imported into TNG and used as you would expect, including media and mapping. In many respects, all of the cloud based genealogy programs, including Ancestry Trees, are derivative of these ideas. To understand any of these dynamic solutions, think of them like you think of importing a Gedcom into Legacy. You import the Gedcom and Legacy/TNG/WorldConnect/etc. load your data from the Gedcom, as best as they can, into the programs database so that you can explore, and in some cases like TNG, edit your data using the program as a genealogy program. -- I have at times edited my TNG family file directly when a visitor pointed out a problem that needed immediate correction; however, normally, for me, corrections come when I update a new Gedcom as Legacy files are always my master file. Last year, I was part of a team of members of the Guild of One Name Studies who looked at these solutions. The Guild has decided to pilot a program where members can get hosting space with the Guild for a web site that after paying for it while living will be retained after the member retires as a means of providing that members' research is not lost and continues to be available. The selected tool for dynamic web sites is TNG. BTW, one of the issues with any web site is how it plays with the various search bots. The Chicago company SimplyHosting is considered to be so TNG friendly that they have TNG specific hosting packages that cost under $5 a month, and they will even install the TNG software for you. (I have no financial interest in any of these vendors.) I use their services after having issues with other services
RE: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
Stuart, You point out an import issue with TNG and webtrees. The product source for both is available for users to inspect and edit. As a programmer, early on I made a number of mods to TNG and soon discovered that I needed to spend too much time each new update to TNG to re-develop those mods for the new release. A couple of years ago, TNG introduced something they call the mod manager. This is a way to create a mod and then have TNG install it. There is now a large catalog of these mods available, most of which need to be tweaked each time an update is prepared. Some of these mods were developed specifically to make it easier to improve how Legacy Gedcoms are imported. Does webtrees have a similar facility? However, once you lock yourself into some of these mods, you may find that you will need help if the developer is no longer maintaining them. john. At 09:00 PM 4/14/2015, Stuart Gregory wrote: Hi Barton, John and other interested people Happy to provide the link but I would like to make a couple of comments. I am currently not using the latest version of webtrees. One of the reasons for this is that I have made some minor modifications to the underlying PHP code and for me to upgrade requires a little work on my part. I host the site on my own web server which is located under my desk in my home and apart from some minor problems (bugs) there is no pressure for me to upgrade. The link to my site is: http://stuart.scss.dyndns.info/FamilyTree/ If you are seriously considering making your Legacy data available on-line, you should look at webtrees more closely. A number of the developers of webtrees offer hosting services (for a fee), but they all provide good support. The software is open source and therefore free. I would recommend that you have a look at the webtrees site here: http://www.webtrees.net/index.php/en/ If you visit this site you will find links to various other sites using webtrees. There are different modules available, some of which radically change the look of the site, but the underlying software and data remains the same. That is, some of the developers have created their own CSS files to present the same information but in a different format. Some final comments. As has already been explained in an earlier post. Legacy creates static web pages and for me, this means thousands of files would need to be uploaded to the web server each time I need to update the web site. Webtrees allows me to enter data directly on my web site and that data is immediately available for everyone to see. Comments regarding the chance of losing data when using TNG or webtrees is a valid comment. But both of these products provide safeguards. One safeguard is for you to implement a setting so that you, as administrator of the site, are the only person who can approve changes or additions to the data. There is no loss of value of having a search engine document your site. In fact tools are provided to enhance the search engine function. Hope this is of value to you. Stuart -Original Message- From: BARTON LEWIS [mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net] Sent: Wednesday, 15 April 2015 12:23 AM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Stuart, is it possible to see a tree generated by wbtrees - yours, perhaps? Thanks, Barton On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:16 AM, Stuart Gregory wrote: For Barton, John and others interested, The open source PHPGedview has not been actively supported for a number of years since the main developer and a lot of others moved to create webtrees. I would definitely not recommend using PHPGedview. Webtrees is open source and therefore free, unlike TNG (The Next Generation). I have been a user of Legacy and webtrees for many years and PHPGedview for several years prior to moving to webtrees. For many years my webtrees site has been my prime database and I occasionally export a Gedcom from my site and create a new Legacy .fdb file so as to create reports that aren't available using webtrees. Although I back up my MySQL database every night, creating a new Legacy .fdb is another form of backup. Stuart -Original Message- From: John Lisle [mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com] Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2015 1:39 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
John, Could you give an example of a TNG mod that makes it easier to import legacy gedcoms? I couldn't find any on the wiki page: http://tng.lythgoes.net/wiki/index.php/Category:Mods_for_TNG_v10 Also looked for gedcom in previous builds. Could you give a direct link? Evert 2015-04-15 8:04 GMT+02:00 John Lisle leg...@johnlisle.com: Stuart, You point out an import issue with TNG and webtrees. The product source for both is available for users to inspect and edit. As a programmer, early on I made a number of mods to TNG and soon discovered that I needed to spend too much time each new update to TNG to re-develop those mods for the new release. A couple of years ago, TNG introduced something they call the mod manager. This is a way to create a mod and then have TNG install it. There is now a large catalog of these mods available, most of which need to be tweaked each time an update is prepared. Some of these mods were developed specifically to make it easier to improve how Legacy Gedcoms are imported. Does webtrees have a similar facility? However, once you lock yourself into some of these mods, you may find that you will need help if the developer is no longer maintaining them. john. At 09:00 PM 4/14/2015, Stuart Gregory wrote: Hi Barton, John and other interested people Happy to provide the link but I would like to make a couple of comments. I am currently not using the latest version of webtrees. One of the reasons for this is that I have made some minor modifications to the underlying PHP code and for me to upgrade requires a little work on my part. I host the site on my own web server which is located under my desk in my home and apart from some minor problems (bugs) there is no pressure for me to upgrade. The link to my site is: http://stuart.scss.dyndns.info/FamilyTree/ If you are seriously considering making your Legacy data available on-line, you should look at webtrees more closely. A number of the developers of webtrees offer hosting services (for a fee), but they all provide good support. The software is open source and therefore free. I would recommend that you have a look at the webtrees site here: http://www.webtrees.net/index.php/en/ If you visit this site you will find links to various other sites using webtrees. There are different modules available, some of which radically change the look of the site, but the underlying software and data remains the same. That is, some of the developers have created their own CSS files to present the same information but in a different format. Some final comments. As has already been explained in an earlier post. Legacy creates static web pages and for me, this means thousands of files would need to be uploaded to the web server each time I need to update the web site. Webtrees allows me to enter data directly on my web site and that data is immediately available for everyone to see. Comments regarding the chance of losing data when using TNG or webtrees is a valid comment. But both of these products provide safeguards. One safeguard is for you to implement a setting so that you, as administrator of the site, are the only person who can approve changes or additions to the data. There is no loss of value of having a search engine document your site. In fact tools are provided to enhance the search engine function. Hope this is of value to you. Stuart -Original Message- From: BARTON LEWIS [mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net] Sent: Wednesday, 15 April 2015 12:23 AM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Stuart, is it possible to see a tree generated by wbtrees - yours, perhaps? Thanks, Barton On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:16 AM, Stuart Gregory wrote: For Barton, John and others interested, The open source PHPGedview has not been actively supported for a number of years since the main developer and a lot of others moved to create webtrees. I would definitely not recommend using PHPGedview. Webtrees is open source and therefore free, unlike TNG (The Next Generation). I have been a user of Legacy and webtrees for many years and PHPGedview for several years prior to moving to webtrees. For many years my webtrees site has been my prime database and I occasionally export a Gedcom from my site and create a new Legacy .fdb file so as to create reports that aren't available using webtrees. Although I back up my MySQL database every night, creating a new Legacy .fdb is another form of backup. Stuart -Original Message- From: John Lisle [mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com] Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2015 1:39 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all
RE: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
For Barton, John and others interested, The open source PHPGedview has not been actively supported for a number of years since the main developer and a lot of others moved to create webtrees. I would definitely not recommend using PHPGedview. Webtrees is open source and therefore free, unlike TNG (The Next Generation). I have been a user of Legacy and webtrees for many years and PHPGedview for several years prior to moving to webtrees. For many years my webtrees site has been my prime database and I occasionally export a Gedcom from my site and create a new Legacy .fdb file so as to create reports that aren't available using webtrees. Although I back up my MySQL database every night, creating a new Legacy .fdb is another form of backup. Stuart -Original Message- From: John Lisle [mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com] Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2015 1:39 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them will be small and, as a result, consume large amounts of hosting space. In the late 1990s, a program was created called IGM by Randy Winch. The idea behind IGM was that you uploaded your Gedcom file to your hosting service along with the IGM software and had IGM process your Gedcom and allow you to have IGM create your web pages dynamically as visitors requested them. Randy enhanced IGM for RootsWeb and that is what RootsWeb's WorldConnect service is using. In the early 2000s, two software products were created to take the IGM experience to a higher level. They have the limitation that the hosting service has to support php scripting MySQL databases that not all free or cable company hosting provides. They also expect the user to have, or have access to, some basic webmastering skills. Both require a quality hosting service and for you to acquire a domain name for your site. One is the OpenSource product phpGedView. This has the advantage that it is free. It is also slow. The other is the commercial product TNG. License cost is minor, and based on personal experience, the visitor experience is far superior and the customization tools provided by the vendor are effective and fairly easy to use. Further, it is the closest in data model to Legacy. Not identical, but most of your Legacy data can be imported into TNG and used as you would expect, including media and mapping. In many respects, all of the cloud based genealogy programs, including Ancestry Trees, are derivative of these ideas. To understand any of these dynamic solutions, think of them like you think of importing a Gedcom into Legacy. You import the Gedcom and Legacy/TNG/WorldConnect/etc. load your data from the Gedcom, as best as they can, into the programs database so that you can explore, and in some cases like TNG, edit your data using the program as a genealogy program. -- I have at times edited my TNG family file directly when a visitor pointed out a problem that needed immediate correction; however, normally, for me, corrections come when I update a new Gedcom as Legacy files are always my master file. Last year, I was part of a team of members of the Guild of One Name Studies who looked at these solutions. The Guild has decided to pilot a program where members can get hosting space with the Guild for a web site that after paying for it while living will be retained after the member retires as a means of providing that members' research is not lost and continues to be available. The selected tool for dynamic web sites is TNG. BTW, one of the issues with any web site is how it plays with the various search bots. The Chicago company SimplyHosting is considered to be so TNG friendly that they have TNG specific hosting packages that cost under $5 a month, and they will even install the TNG software for you. (I have no financial interest in any of these vendors.) I use their services after having issues with other services. -- if you want easy places to preserve your data for no cost, I would suggest WorldConnect or FamilySearch (their community trees are based on limited version of TNG). Both have limitations on what can be displayed and what, if any, media items you can attach to your tree. Questions? john. At 12:01 AM 4/14/2015, Cathy Pinner wrote: Hi Barton, Thought I'd get your email out of an irrelevant thread. I can't help with your hosting and compatibility issues. However, Legacy Web
RE: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
Stuart, is it possible to see a tree generated by wbtrees - yours, perhaps? Thanks, Barton On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:16 AM, Stuart Gregory wrote: For Barton, John and others interested, The open source PHPGedview has not been actively supported for a number of years since the main developer and a lot of others moved to create webtrees. I would definitely not recommend using PHPGedview. Webtrees is open source and therefore free, unlike TNG (The Next Generation). I have been a user of Legacy and webtrees for many years and PHPGedview for several years prior to moving to webtrees. For many years my webtrees site has been my prime database and I occasionally export a Gedcom from my site and create a new Legacy .fdb file so as to create reports that aren't available using webtrees. Although I back up my MySQL database every night, creating a new Legacy .fdb is another form of backup. Stuart -Original Message- From: John Lisle [mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com] Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2015 1:39 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them will be small and, as a result, consume large amounts of hosting space. In the late 1990s, a program was created called IGM by Randy Winch. The idea behind IGM was that you uploaded your Gedcom file to your hosting service along with the IGM software and had IGM process your Gedcom and allow you to have IGM create your web pages dynamically as visitors requested them. Randy enhanced IGM for RootsWeb and that is what RootsWeb's WorldConnect service is using. In the early 2000s, two software products were created to take the IGM experience to a higher level. They have the limitation that the hosting service has to support php scripting MySQL databases that not all free or cable company hosting provides. They also expect the user to have, or have access to, some basic webmastering skills. Both require a quality hosting service and for you to acquire a domain name for your site. One is the OpenSource product phpGedView. This has the advantage that it is free. It is also slow. The other is the commercial product TNG. License cost is minor, and based on personal experience, the visitor experience is far superior and the customization tools provided by the vendor are effective and fairly easy to use. Further, it is the closest in data model to Legacy. Not identical, but most of your Legacy data can be imported into TNG and used as you would expect, including media and mapping. In many respects, all of the cloud based genealogy programs, including Ancestry Trees, are derivative of these ideas. To understand any of these dynamic solutions, think of them like you think of importing a Gedcom into Legacy. You import the Gedcom and Legacy/TNG/WorldConnect/etc. load your data from the Gedcom, as best as they can, into the programs database so that you can explore, and in some cases like TNG, edit your data using the program as a genealogy program. -- I have at times edited my TNG family file directly when a visitor pointed out a problem that needed immediate correction; however, normally, for me, corrections come when I update a new Gedcom as Legacy files are always my master file. Last year, I was part of a team of members of the Guild of One Name Studies who looked at these solutions. The Guild has decided to pilot a program where members can get hosting space with the Guild for a web site that after paying for it while living will be retained after the member retires as a means of providing that members' research is not lost and continues to be available. The selected tool for dynamic web sites is TNG. BTW, one of the issues with any web site is how it plays with the various search bots. The Chicago company SimplyHosting is considered to be so TNG friendly that they have TNG specific hosting packages that cost under $5 a month, and they will even install the TNG software for you. (I have no financial interest in any of these vendors.) I use their services after having issues with other services. -- if you want easy places to preserve your data for no cost, I would suggest WorldConnect or FamilySearch (their community trees are based on limited version of TNG). Both have limitations on what can be displayed and what, if any, media items you can attach to your tree. Questions
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
John, thank you for the informative background. I think I would not want to go with WorldConnect or FamilySearch as I want to be able to display media. So I have been viewing the web page links at TNG and think that's the way I want to go. My only concern is that by using my cable compnay as my website host I may run into problems if there is some kind of incompatability with using TNG -- but I don't know if that's an issue. I guess if it could be, I will only find out by trying it. And if it does prove to be an issue, I could take my domain somewhere else to be hosted. Does all of this sound reasonable/accurate? Thanks, Barton On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:38 AM, John Lisle wrote: Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them will be small and, as a result, consume large amounts of hosting space. In the late 1990s, a program was created called IGM by Randy Winch. The idea behind IGM was that you uploaded your Gedcom file to your hosting service along with the IGM software and had IGM process your Gedcom and allow you to have IGM create your web pages dynamically as visitors requested them. Randy enhanced IGM for RootsWeb and that is what RootsWeb's WorldConnect service is using. In the early 2000s, two software products were created to take the IGM experience to a higher level. They have the limitation that the hosting service has to support php scripting MySQL databases that not all free or cable company hosting provides. They also expect the user to have, or have access to, some basic webmastering skills. Both require a quality hosting service and for you to acquire a domain name for your site. One is the OpenSource product phpGedView. This has the advantage that it is free. It is also slow. The other is the commercial product TNG. License cost is minor, and based on personal experience, the visitor experience is far superior and the customization tools provided by the vendor are effective and fairly easy to use. Further, it is the closest in data model to Legacy. Not identical, but most of your Legacy data can be imported into TNG and used as you would expect, including media and mapping. In many respects, all of the cloud based genealogy programs, including Ancestry Trees, are derivative of these ideas. To understand any of these dynamic solutions, think of them like you think of importing a Gedcom into Legacy. You import the Gedcom and Legacy/TNG/WorldConnect/etc. load your data from the Gedcom, as best as they can, into the programs database so that you can explore, and in some cases like TNG, edit your data using the program as a genealogy program. -- I have at times edited my TNG family file directly when a visitor pointed out a problem that needed immediate correction; however, normally, for me, corrections come when I update a new Gedcom as Legacy files are always my master file. Last year, I was part of a team of members of the Guild of One Name Studies who looked at these solutions. The Guild has decided to pilot a program where members can get hosting space with the Guild for a web site that after paying for it while living will be retained after the member retires as a means of providing that members' research is not lost and continues to be available. The selected tool for dynamic web sites is TNG. BTW, one of the issues with any web site is how it plays with the various search bots. The Chicago company SimplyHosting is considered to be so TNG friendly that they have TNG specific hosting packages that cost under $5 a month, and they will even install the TNG software for you. (I have no financial interest in any of these vendors.) I use their services after having issues with other services. -- if you want easy places to preserve your data for no cost, I would suggest WorldConnect or FamilySearch (their community trees are based on limited version of TNG). Both have limitations on what can be displayed and what, if any, media items you can attach to your tree. Questions? john. At 12:01 AM 4/14/2015, Cathy Pinner wrote: Hi Barton, Thought I'd get your email out of an irrelevant thread. I can't help with your hosting and compatibility issues. However, Legacy Web Pages are generated on your computer and you can view them in your browser. Uploading them to a host is a another step. So go to Internet Ribbon and choose an option in the Create Web Pages section and
RE: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
Hi Barton, John and other interested people Happy to provide the link but I would like to make a couple of comments. I am currently not using the latest version of webtrees. One of the reasons for this is that I have made some minor modifications to the underlying PHP code and for me to upgrade requires a little work on my part. I host the site on my own web server which is located under my desk in my home and apart from some minor problems (bugs) there is no pressure for me to upgrade. The link to my site is: http://stuart.scss.dyndns.info/FamilyTree/ If you are seriously considering making your Legacy data available on-line, you should look at webtrees more closely. A number of the developers of webtrees offer hosting services (for a fee), but they all provide good support. The software is open source and therefore free. I would recommend that you have a look at the webtrees site here: http://www.webtrees.net/index.php/en/ If you visit this site you will find links to various other sites using webtrees. There are different modules available, some of which radically change the look of the site, but the underlying software and data remains the same. That is, some of the developers have created their own CSS files to present the same information but in a different format. Some final comments. As has already been explained in an earlier post. Legacy creates static web pages and for me, this means thousands of files would need to be uploaded to the web server each time I need to update the web site. Webtrees allows me to enter data directly on my web site and that data is immediately available for everyone to see. Comments regarding the chance of losing data when using TNG or webtrees is a valid comment. But both of these products provide safeguards. One safeguard is for you to implement a setting so that you, as administrator of the site, are the only person who can approve changes or additions to the data. There is no loss of value of having a search engine document your site. In fact tools are provided to enhance the search engine function. Hope this is of value to you. Stuart -Original Message- From: BARTON LEWIS [mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net] Sent: Wednesday, 15 April 2015 12:23 AM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Stuart, is it possible to see a tree generated by wbtrees - yours, perhaps? Thanks, Barton On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:16 AM, Stuart Gregory wrote: For Barton, John and others interested, The open source PHPGedview has not been actively supported for a number of years since the main developer and a lot of others moved to create webtrees. I would definitely not recommend using PHPGedview. Webtrees is open source and therefore free, unlike TNG (The Next Generation). I have been a user of Legacy and webtrees for many years and PHPGedview for several years prior to moving to webtrees. For many years my webtrees site has been my prime database and I occasionally export a Gedcom from my site and create a new Legacy .fdb file so as to create reports that aren't available using webtrees. Although I back up my MySQL database every night, creating a new Legacy .fdb is another form of backup. Stuart -Original Message- From: John Lisle [mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com] Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2015 1:39 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them will be small and, as a result, consume large amounts of hosting space. In the late 1990s, a program was created called IGM by Randy Winch. The idea behind IGM was that you uploaded your Gedcom file to your hosting service along with the IGM software and had IGM process your Gedcom and allow you to have IGM create your web pages dynamically as visitors requested them. Randy enhanced IGM for RootsWeb and that is what RootsWeb's WorldConnect service is using. In the early 2000s, two software products were created to take the IGM experience to a higher level. They have the limitation that the hosting service has to support php scripting MySQL databases that not all free or cable company hosting provides. They also expect the user to have, or have access to, some basic webmastering skills. Both require a quality hosting service and for you to acquire a domain name for your site. One is the OpenSource product
RE: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
Thank you, Stuart. Very helpful and informative. Barton -Original Message- From: Stuart Gregory [mailto:stu...@scss.com.au] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 9:01 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Hi Barton, John and other interested people Happy to provide the link but I would like to make a couple of comments. I am currently not using the latest version of webtrees. One of the reasons for this is that I have made some minor modifications to the underlying PHP code and for me to upgrade requires a little work on my part. I host the site on my own web server which is located under my desk in my home and apart from some minor problems (bugs) there is no pressure for me to upgrade. The link to my site is: http://stuart.scss.dyndns.info/FamilyTree/ If you are seriously considering making your Legacy data available on-line, you should look at webtrees more closely. A number of the developers of webtrees offer hosting services (for a fee), but they all provide good support. The software is open source and therefore free. I would recommend that you have a look at the webtrees site here: http://www.webtrees.net/index.php/en/ If you visit this site you will find links to various other sites using webtrees. There are different modules available, some of which radically change the look of the site, but the underlying software and data remains the same. That is, some of the developers have created their own CSS files to present the same information but in a different format. Some final comments. As has already been explained in an earlier post. Legacy creates static web pages and for me, this means thousands of files would need to be uploaded to the web server each time I need to update the web site. Webtrees allows me to enter data directly on my web site and that data is immediately available for everyone to see. Comments regarding the chance of losing data when using TNG or webtrees is a valid comment. But both of these products provide safeguards. One safeguard is for you to implement a setting so that you, as administrator of the site, are the only person who can approve changes or additions to the data. There is no loss of value of having a search engine document your site. In fact tools are provided to enhance the search engine function. Hope this is of value to you. Stuart Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
Barton, Although WC and FS do not (easily) take media, they are worthwhile as places to archive your genealogy that also makes your research available to different audiences. One of my issues with using Cable company for web site (or email address) is that you might drop your cable company and then lose your site. If you are using TNG or webtrees or some other tool with collaborative ability, you could lose data and you might also lose the value of having a search engine document your site. In general, Comcast and that ilk does not support PHP and MySQL sites nor sites as large as you will probably want, as soon as you start adding media. :-) They may be restricted to various size or bandwidth limits. (As an aside, some folks have mentioned hosting services that offer unlimited space and bandwidth. Every one of them have other limits, usually CPU usage or the like and tend to be quite cruel in deciding to kick you off if you hit one of their hidden limits. Look for a reputable hosting service that has 24/7 support. john. At 11:32 AM 4/14/2015, BARTON LEWIS wrote: John, thank you for the informative background. I think I would not want to go with WorldConnect or FamilySearch as I want to be able to display media. So I have been viewing the web page links at TNG and think that's the way I want to go. My only concern is that by using my cable compnay as my website host I may run into problems if there is some kind of incompatability with using TNG -- but I don't know if that's an issue. I guess if it could be, I will only find out by trying it. And if it does prove to be an issue, I could take my domain somewhere else to be hosted. Does all of this sound reasonable/accurate? Thanks, Barton    On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:38 AM, John Lisle wrote:   Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them will be small and, as a result, consume large amounts of hosting space. In the late 1990s, a program was created called IGM by Randy Winch. The idea behind IGM was that you uploaded your Gedcom file to your hosting service along with the IGM software and had IGM process your Gedcom and allow you to have IGM create your web pages dynamically as visitors requested them. Randy enhanced IGM for RootsWeb and that is what RootsWeb's WorldConnect service is using. In the early 2000s, two software products were created to take the IGM experience to a higher level. They have the limitation that the hosting service has to support php scripting MySQL databases that not all free or cable company hosting provides. They also expect the user to have, or have access to, some basic webmastering skills. Both require a quality hosting service and for you to acquire a domain name for your site. One is the OpenSource product phpGedView. This has the advantage that it is free. It is also slow. The other is the commercial product TNG. License cost is minor, and based on personal experience, the visitor experience is far superior and the customization tools provided by the vendor are effective and fairly easy to use. Further, it is the closest in data model to Legacy. Not identical, but most of your Legacy data can be imported into TNG and used as you would expect, including media and mapping. In many respects, all of the cloud based genealogy programs, including Ancestry Trees, are derivative of these ideas. To understand any of these dynamic solutions, think of them like you think of importing a Gedcom into Legacy. You import the Gedcom and Legacy/TNG/WorldConnect/etc. load your data from the Gedcom, as best as they can, into the programs database so that you can explore, and in some cases like TNG, edit your data using the program as a genealogy program. -- I have at times edited my TNG family file directly when a visitor pointed out a problem that needed immediate correction; however, normally, for me, corrections come when I update a new Gedcom as Legacy files are always my master file. Last year, I was part of a team of members of the Guild of One Name Studies who looked at these solutions. The Guild has decided to pilot a program where members can get hosting space with the Guild for a web site that after paying for it while living will be retained after the member retires as a means of providing that members' research is not lost and continues to be
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
The problem with webtrees and its predecessor phpgedview, is that neither of these programs break down a gedcom into data sets, but rather leave it intact as whole and each action reads from the one file and generates an answer, thus it will get slower and slower as anything is added to it. No one is ever going to come close to the response time seen in Legacy as a desktop software. Especially when dealing with larger files. TNG is the best option, but unfortunately its a one man operation, limited to expansion and lacking in graphic appeal. But its also the best at storing and manipulating any genealogy data. Find what works best for you. On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Stuart Gregory stu...@scss.com.au wrote: For Barton, John and others interested, The open source PHPGedview has not been actively supported for a number of years since the main developer and a lot of others moved to create webtrees. I would definitely not recommend using PHPGedview. Webtrees is open source and therefore free, unlike TNG (The Next Generation). I have been a user of Legacy and webtrees for many years and PHPGedview for several years prior to moving to webtrees. For many years my webtrees site has been my prime database and I occasionally export a Gedcom from my site and create a new Legacy .fdb file so as to create reports that aren't available using webtrees. Although I back up my MySQL database every night, creating a new Legacy .fdb is another form of backup. Stuart -Original Message- From: John Lisle [mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com] Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2015 1:39 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them will be small and, as a result, consume large amounts of hosting space. In the late 1990s, a program was created called IGM by Randy Winch. The idea behind IGM was that you uploaded your Gedcom file to your hosting service along with the IGM software and had IGM process your Gedcom and allow you to have IGM create your web pages dynamically as visitors requested them. Randy enhanced IGM for RootsWeb and that is what RootsWeb's WorldConnect service is using. In the early 2000s, two software products were created to take the IGM experience to a higher level. They have the limitation that the hosting service has to support php scripting MySQL databases that not all free or cable company hosting provides. They also expect the user to have, or have access to, some basic webmastering skills. Both require a quality hosting service and for you to acquire a domain name for your site. One is the OpenSource product phpGedView. This has the advantage that it is free. It is also slow. The other is the commercial product TNG. License cost is minor, and based on personal experience, the visitor experience is far superior and the customization tools provided by the vendor are effective and fairly easy to use. Further, it is the closest in data model to Legacy. Not identical, but most of your Legacy data can be imported into TNG and used as you would expect, including media and mapping. In many respects, all of the cloud based genealogy programs, including Ancestry Trees, are derivative of these ideas. To understand any of these dynamic solutions, think of them like you think of importing a Gedcom into Legacy. You import the Gedcom and Legacy/TNG/WorldConnect/etc. load your data from the Gedcom, as best as they can, into the programs database so that you can explore, and in some cases like TNG, edit your data using the program as a genealogy program. -- I have at times edited my TNG family file directly when a visitor pointed out a problem that needed immediate correction; however, normally, for me, corrections come when I update a new Gedcom as Legacy files are always my master file. Last year, I was part of a team of members of the Guild of One Name Studies who looked at these solutions. The Guild has decided to pilot a program where members can get hosting space with the Guild for a web site that after paying for it while living will be retained after the member retires as a means of providing that members' research is not lost and continues to be available. The selected tool for dynamic web sites is TNG. BTW, one of the issues with any web site is how it plays with the various search bots. The Chicago company SimplyHosting is considered
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
After looking over many pages at TNG, an objection I have is that Sources is a separate page that is unlinked to any other. If you upload your GEDCOM to TNG, what happens to all your sources? Do they become separated from the events they document, or are they transferred over at all? I envision using my website to document a line one at a time, uploading all the original source documentation or abstracts from published books, etc. I would like to combine a narrative with some descendant data, but probably not all. I liked Pat Hickin's tree at wikitree for this reason, and that the sources were all displayed as footnotes and so easily seen in context with the events they documented. Barton On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:33 PM, John Lisle wrote: Barton, Although WC and FS do not (easily) take media, they are worthwhile as places to archive your genealogy that also makes your research available to different audiences. One of my issues with using Cable company for web site (or email address) is that you might drop your cable company and then lose your site. If you are using TNG or webtrees or some other tool with collaborative ability, you could lose data and you might also lose the value of having a search engine document your site. In general, Comcast and that ilk does not support PHP and MySQL sites nor sites as large as you will probably want, as soon as you start adding media. :-) They may be restricted to various size or bandwidth limits. (As an aside, some folks have mentioned hosting services that offer unlimited space and bandwidth. Every one of them have other limits, usually CPU usage or the like and tend to be quite cruel in deciding to kick you off if you hit one of their hidden limits. Look for a reputable hosting service that has 24/7 support. john. At 11:32 AM 4/14/2015, BARTON LEWIS wrote: John, thank you for the informative background. I think I would not want to go with WorldConnect or FamilySearch as I want to be able to display media. So I have been viewing the web page links at TNG and think that's the way I want to go. My only concern is that by using my cable compnay as my website host I may run into problems if there is some kind of incompatability with using TNG -- but I don't know if that's an issue. I guess if it could be, I will only find out by trying it. And if it does prove to be an issue, I could take my domain somewhere else to be hosted. Does all of this sound reasonable/accurate? Thanks, Barton    On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:38 AM, John Lisle wrote:   Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them will be small and, as a result, consume large amounts of hosting space. In the late 1990s, a program was created called IGM by Randy Winch. The idea behind IGM was that you uploaded your Gedcom file to your hosting service along with the IGM software and had IGM process your Gedcom and allow you to have IGM create your web pages dynamically as visitors requested them. Randy enhanced IGM for RootsWeb and that is what RootsWeb's WorldConnect service is using. In the early 2000s, two software products were created to take the IGM experience to a higher level. They have the limitation that the hosting service has to support php scripting MySQL databases that not all free or cable company hosting provides. They also expect the user to have, or have access to, some basic webmastering skills. Both require a quality hosting service and for you to acquire a domain name for your site. One is the OpenSource product phpGedView. This has the advantage that it is free. It is also slow. The other is the commercial product TNG. License cost is minor, and based on personal experience, the visitor experience is far superior and the customization tools provided by the vendor are effective and fairly easy to use. Further, it is the closest in data model to Legacy. Not identical, but most of your Legacy data can be imported into TNG and used as you would expect, including media and mapping. In many respects, all of the cloud based genealogy programs, including Ancestry Trees, are derivative of these ideas. To understand any of these dynamic solutions, think of them like you think of importing a Gedcom into Legacy. You import the Gedcom and Legacy/TNG/WorldConnect/etc. load your data from the Gedcom, as best as they can, into the programs database so that
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
John, in your statement, If you are using TNG or webtrees or some other tool with collaborative ability, you could lose data and you might also lose the value of having a search engine document your site. do you means if you use TNG in conjunction with a cable company host provider (subject of preceding objection), or if you use TNG, period. I assume the former, but am not sure. If the latter, what is the best alternative to using a tool with collaborative ability? Are dynamic web pages by definition ones with collaborative ability? What does collaborative ability mean, precisely? Thanks, Barton On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:33 PM, John Lisle wrote: Barton, Although WC and FS do not (easily) take media, they are worthwhile as places to archive your genealogy that also makes your research available to different audiences. One of my issues with using Cable company for web site (or email address) is that you might drop your cable company and then lose your site. If you are using TNG or webtrees or some other tool with collaborative ability, you could lose data and you might also lose the value of having a search engine document your site. In general, Comcast and that ilk does not support PHP and MySQL sites nor sites as large as you will probably want, as soon as you start adding media. :-) They may be restricted to various size or bandwidth limits. (As an aside, some folks have mentioned hosting services that offer unlimited space and bandwidth. Every one of them have other limits, usually CPU usage or the like and tend to be quite cruel in deciding to kick you off if you hit one of their hidden limits. Look for a reputable hosting service that has 24/7 support. john. At 11:32 AM 4/14/2015, BARTON LEWIS wrote: John, thank you for the informative background. I think I would not want to go with WorldConnect or FamilySearch as I want to be able to display media. So I have been viewing the web page links at TNG and think that's the way I want to go. My only concern is that by using my cable compnay as my website host I may run into problems if there is some kind of incompatability with using TNG -- but I don't know if that's an issue. I guess if it could be, I will only find out by trying it. And if it does prove to be an issue, I could take my domain somewhere else to be hosted. Does all of this sound reasonable/accurate? Thanks, Barton    On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:38 AM, John Lisle wrote:   Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them will be small and, as a result, consume large amounts of hosting space. In the late 1990s, a program was created called IGM by Randy Winch. The idea behind IGM was that you uploaded your Gedcom file to your hosting service along with the IGM software and had IGM process your Gedcom and allow you to have IGM create your web pages dynamically as visitors requested them. Randy enhanced IGM for RootsWeb and that is what RootsWeb's WorldConnect service is using. In the early 2000s, two software products were created to take the IGM experience to a higher level. They have the limitation that the hosting service has to support php scripting MySQL databases that not all free or cable company hosting provides. They also expect the user to have, or have access to, some basic webmastering skills. Both require a quality hosting service and for you to acquire a domain name for your site. One is the OpenSource product phpGedView. This has the advantage that it is free. It is also slow. The other is the commercial product TNG. License cost is minor, and based on personal experience, the visitor experience is far superior and the customization tools provided by the vendor are effective and fairly easy to use. Further, it is the closest in data model to Legacy. Not identical, but most of your Legacy data can be imported into TNG and used as you would expect, including media and mapping. In many respects, all of the cloud based genealogy programs, including Ancestry Trees, are derivative of these ideas. To understand any of these dynamic solutions, think of them like you think of importing a Gedcom into Legacy. You import the Gedcom and Legacy/TNG/WorldConnect/etc. load your data from the Gedcom, as best as they can, into the programs database so that you can explore, and in some cases like TNG, edit your data using the program as a genealogy
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
Thanks, Margaret, I am seeing that now on some of the pages. Barton On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 04:54 PM, Margaret Turner wrote: With regard to sources and tng. 1. If any event is sourced, then they have a footnote suffix, 2.These numbered sources are listed at the bottom of a person's page http://turnermob.com/getperson.php?personID=I245tree=turner http://turnermob.com/getperson.php?personID=I245tree=turner (I use Legacy 7, basic sources and my reserach dates from late 1997 so I many sources are not in the Mills Evidence Explained http://news.legacyfamilytree.com/legacy_news/2013/07/legacy-family-tree-8-revealed-sources.html http://news.legacyfamilytree.com/legacy_news/2013/07/legacy-family-tree-8-revealed-sources.html http://www.legacyfamilytreestore.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=EV2 http://www.legacyfamilytreestore.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=EV2 PS I use Legacy as my database, upload gedcom to tng, and customised the tng-suppled templates. :) Margaret On 15 April 2015 at 06:04, BARTON LEWIS bartonle...@optonline.net mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net wrote: After looking over many pages at TNG, an objection I have is that Sources is a separate page that is unlinked to any other. If you upload your GEDCOM to TNG, what happens to all your sources? Do they become separated from the events they document, or are they transferred over at all? I envision using my website to document a line one at a time, uploading all the original source documentation or abstracts from published books, etc. I would like to combine a narrative with some descendant data, but probably not all. I liked Pat Hickin's tree at wikitree for this reason, and that the sources were all displayed as footnotes and so easily seen in context with the events they documented. Barton On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:33 PM, John Lisle wrote: Barton, Although WC and FS do not (easily) take media, they are worthwhile as places to archive your genealogy that also makes your research available to different audiences. One of my issues with using Cable company for web site (or email address) is that you might drop your cable company and then lose your site. If you are using TNG or webtrees or some other tool with collaborative ability, you could lose data and you might also lose the value of having a search engine document your site. In general, Comcast and that ilk does not support PHP and MySQL sites nor sites as large as you will probably want, as soon as you start adding media. :-) They may be restricted to various size or bandwidth limits. (As an aside, some folks have mentioned hosting services that offer unlimited space and bandwidth. Every one of them have other limits, usually CPU usage or the like and tend to be quite cruel in deciding to kick you off if you hit one of their hidden limits. Look for a reputable hosting service that has 24/7 support. john. At 11:32 AM 4/14/2015, BARTON LEWIS wrote: John, thank you for the informative background. I think I would not want to go with WorldConnect or FamilySearch as I want to be able to display media. So I have been viewing the web page links at TNG and think that's the way I want to go. My only concern is that by using my cable compnay as my website host I may run into problems if there is some kind of incompatability with using TNG -- but I don't know if that's an issue. I guess if it could be, I will only find out by trying it. And if it does prove to be an issue, I could take my domain somewhere else to be hosted. Does all of this sound reasonable/accurate? Thanks, Barton    On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:38 AM, John Lisle wrote:   Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them will be small and, as a result, consume large amounts of hosting space. In the late 1990s, a program was created called IGM by Randy Winch. The idea behind IGM was that you uploaded your Gedcom file to your hosting service along with the IGM software and had IGM process your Gedcom and allow you to have IGM create your web pages dynamically as visitors requested them. Randy enhanced IGM for RootsWeb and that is what RootsWeb's WorldConnect service is using. In the early 2000s, two software products were created to take the IGM experience to a higher level. They have the limitation
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
With regard to sources and tng. 1. If any event is sourced, then they have a footnote suffix, 2.These numbered sources are listed at the bottom of a person's page http://turnermob.com/getperson.php?personID=I245tree=turner (I use Legacy 7, basic sources and my reserach dates from late 1997 so I many sources are not in the Mills Evidence Explained http://news.legacyfamilytree.com/legacy_news/2013/07/legacy-family-tree-8-revealed-sources.html http://www.legacyfamilytreestore.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=EV2 PS I use Legacy as my database, upload gedcom to tng, and customised the tng-suppled templates. :) Margaret On 15 April 2015 at 06:04, BARTON LEWIS bartonle...@optonline.net wrote: After looking over many pages at TNG, an objection I have is that Sources is a separate page that is unlinked to any other. If you upload your GEDCOM to TNG, what happens to all your sources? Do they become separated from the events they document, or are they transferred over at all? I envision using my website to document a line one at a time, uploading all the original source documentation or abstracts from published books, etc. I would like to combine a narrative with some descendant data, but probably not all. I liked Pat Hickin's tree at wikitree for this reason, and that the sources were all displayed as footnotes and so easily seen in context with the events they documented. Barton On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:33 PM, John Lisle wrote: Barton, Although WC and FS do not (easily) take media, they are worthwhile as places to archive your genealogy that also makes your research available to different audiences. One of my issues with using Cable company for web site (or email address) is that you might drop your cable company and then lose your site. If you are using TNG or webtrees or some other tool with collaborative ability, you could lose data and you might also lose the value of having a search engine document your site. In general, Comcast and that ilk does not support PHP and MySQL sites nor sites as large as you will probably want, as soon as you start adding media. :-) They may be restricted to various size or bandwidth limits. (As an aside, some folks have mentioned hosting services that offer unlimited space and bandwidth. Every one of them have other limits, usually CPU usage or the like and tend to be quite cruel in deciding to kick you off if you hit one of their hidden limits. Look for a reputable hosting service that has 24/7 support. john. At 11:32 AM 4/14/2015, BARTON LEWIS wrote: John, thank you for the informative background. I think I would not want to go with WorldConnect or FamilySearch as I want to be able to display media. So I have been viewing the web page links at TNG and think that's the way I want to go. My only concern is that by using my cable compnay as my website host I may run into problems if there is some kind of incompatability with using TNG -- but I don't know if that's an issue. I guess if it could be, I will only find out by trying it. And if it does prove to be an issue, I could take my domain somewhere else to be hosted. Does all of this sound reasonable/accurate? Thanks, Barton    On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:38 AM, John Lisle wrote:   Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them will be small and, as a result, consume large amounts of hosting space. In the late 1990s, a program was created called IGM by Randy Winch. The idea behind IGM was that you uploaded your Gedcom file to your hosting service along with the IGM software and had IGM process your Gedcom and allow you to have IGM create your web pages dynamically as visitors requested them. Randy enhanced IGM for RootsWeb and that is what RootsWeb's WorldConnect service is using. In the early 2000s, two software products were created to take the IGM experience to a higher level. They have the limitation that the hosting service has to support php scripting MySQL databases that not all free or cable company hosting provides. They also expect the user to have, or have access to, some basic webmastering skills. Both require a quality hosting service and for you to acquire a domain name for your site. One is the OpenSource product phpGedView. This has the advantage that it is free. It is also slow.
RE: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
Stuart, Thank you for mentioning webtrees. I was aware of it but have not investigated it. One of my issues with phpGedview was that it did not well handle large Gedcoms. After looking at the site samples on their web site, I do not see examples of large files. However, it does appear to be far superior to phpGedview in most other ways. I will need to give it more thought as an alternative to TNG. The TNG license cost is not a factor in contrast to the cost of hosting service and domain name that would be common to both TNG or webtrees. Another web site solution that I did not mention is www.gigatrees.com. That site has some tools for Gedcom analysis that are useful to assuring that your data is not bonkers. They also have an ability to create from your Gedcom a set of static pages for a web site that is more interactive than the Legacy pages. I find that is useful when researching a large new family branch as I can quickly go from Legacy to a private web site to review the data. john. At 06:16 AM 4/14/2015, Stuart Gregory wrote: For Barton, John and others interested, The open source PHPGedview has not been actively supported for a number of years since the main developer and a lot of others moved to create webtrees. I would definitely not recommend using PHPGedview. Webtrees is open source and therefore free, unlike TNG (The Next Generation). I have been a user of Legacy and webtrees for many years and PHPGedview for several years prior to moving to webtrees. For many years my webtrees site has been my prime database and I occasionally export a Gedcom from my site and create a new Legacy .fdb file so as to create reports that aren't available using webtrees. Although I back up my MySQL database every night, creating a new Legacy .fdb is another form of backup. Stuart -Original Message- From: John Lisle [mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com] Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2015 1:39 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them will be small and, as a result, consume large amounts of hosting space. In the late 1990s, a program was created called IGM by Randy Winch. The idea behind IGM was that you uploaded your Gedcom file to your hosting service along with the IGM software and had IGM process your Gedcom and allow you to have IGM create your web pages dynamically as visitors requested them. Randy enhanced IGM for RootsWeb and that is what RootsWeb's WorldConnect service is using. In the early 2000s, two software products were created to take the IGM experience to a higher level. They have the limitation that the hosting service has to support php scripting MySQL databases that not all free or cable company hosting provides. They also expect the user to have, or have access to, some basic webmastering skills. Both require a quality hosting service and for you to acquire a domain name for your site. One is the OpenSource product phpGedView. This has the advantage that it is free. It is also slow. The other is the commercial product TNG. License cost is minor, and based on personal experience, the visitor experience is far superior and the customization tools provided by the vendor are effective and fairly easy to use. Further, it is the closest in data model to Legacy. Not identical, but most of your Legacy data can be imported into TNG and used as you would expect, including media and mapping. In many respects, all of the cloud based genealogy programs, including Ancestry Trees, are derivative of these ideas. To understand any of these dynamic solutions, think of them like you think of importing a Gedcom into Legacy. You import the Gedcom and Legacy/TNG/WorldConnect/etc. load your data from the Gedcom, as best as they can, into the programs database so that you can explore, and in some cases like TNG, edit your data using the program as a genealogy program. -- I have at times edited my TNG family file directly when a visitor pointed out a problem that needed immediate correction; however, normally, for me, corrections come when I update a new Gedcom as Legacy files are always my master file. Last year, I was part of a team of members of the Guild of One Name Studies who looked at these solutions. The Guild has decided to pilot a program where members can get hosting space with the Guild for a web site that after paying for it while living will be retained after the member retires as a means
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
Barton, Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages. Static pages means you create all of the pages you wish to upload to whatever hosting service you wish to use. After you create the pages on your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages by FTP (or some similar tool) to your hosting service. You may wish to create some pages as home pages to tell your story. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not scale well. As the size of your family file gets bigger, you have more and more pages. Further, many of them will be small and, as a result, consume large amounts of hosting space. In the late 1990s, a program was created called IGM by Randy Winch. The idea behind IGM was that you uploaded your Gedcom file to your hosting service along with the IGM software and had IGM process your Gedcom and allow you to have IGM create your web pages dynamically as visitors requested them. Randy enhanced IGM for RootsWeb and that is what RootsWeb's WorldConnect service is using. In the early 2000s, two software products were created to take the IGM experience to a higher level. They have the limitation that the hosting service has to support php scripting MySQL databases that not all free or cable company hosting provides. They also expect the user to have, or have access to, some basic webmastering skills. Both require a quality hosting service and for you to acquire a domain name for your site. One is the OpenSource product phpGedView. This has the advantage that it is free. It is also slow. The other is the commercial product TNG. License cost is minor, and based on personal experience, the visitor experience is far superior and the customization tools provided by the vendor are effective and fairly easy to use. Further, it is the closest in data model to Legacy. Not identical, but most of your Legacy data can be imported into TNG and used as you would expect, including media and mapping. In many respects, all of the cloud based genealogy programs, including Ancestry Trees, are derivative of these ideas. To understand any of these dynamic solutions, think of them like you think of importing a Gedcom into Legacy. You import the Gedcom and Legacy/TNG/WorldConnect/etc. load your data from the Gedcom, as best as they can, into the programs database so that you can explore, and in some cases like TNG, edit your data using the program as a genealogy program. -- I have at times edited my TNG family file directly when a visitor pointed out a problem that needed immediate correction; however, normally, for me, corrections come when I update a new Gedcom as Legacy files are always my master file. Last year, I was part of a team of members of the Guild of One Name Studies who looked at these solutions. The Guild has decided to pilot a program where members can get hosting space with the Guild for a web site that after paying for it while living will be retained after the member retires as a means of providing that members' research is not lost and continues to be available. The selected tool for dynamic web sites is TNG. BTW, one of the issues with any web site is how it plays with the various search bots. The Chicago company SimplyHosting is considered to be so TNG friendly that they have TNG specific hosting packages that cost under $5 a month, and they will even install the TNG software for you. (I have no financial interest in any of these vendors.) I use their services after having issues with other services. -- if you want easy places to preserve your data for no cost, I would suggest WorldConnect or FamilySearch (their community trees are based on limited version of TNG). Both have limitations on what can be displayed and what, if any, media items you can attach to your tree. Questions? john. At 12:01 AM 4/14/2015, Cathy Pinner wrote: Hi Barton, Thought I'd get your email out of an irrelevant thread. I can't help with your hosting and compatibility issues. However, Legacy Web Pages are generated on your computer and you can view them in your browser. Uploading them to a host is a another step. So go to Internet Ribbon and choose an option in the Create Web Pages section and play. To see what others have done with Legacy Web Pages, Google with Legacy 8.0 from Millennia including the quotes. Cathy My cable provider for a nominal fee provides web hosting so I upgraded. I started using Kompozer to build a website. I donât think itâs going to be adequate to what I want to do and also I've had problems with it -- the cable provider says it's creating problems and they recommend using their tool to build the website. Itâs free. But I donât like its templates -- they're not suited to what I want to do. I am now worried about this host provider not being compatible with whatever website building tool I choose. I'm not sure if I should be - don't know enough about it. I want to find a website building tool that gives me freedom to
[LegacyUG] Testing Legacy Web Pages
Hi Barton, Thought I'd get your email out of an irrelevant thread. I can't help with your hosting and compatibility issues. However, Legacy Web Pages are generated on your computer and you can view them in your browser. Uploading them to a host is a another step. So go to Internet Ribbon and choose an option in the Create Web Pages section and play. To see what others have done with Legacy Web Pages, Google with Legacy 8.0 from Millennia including the quotes. Cathy My cable provider for a nominal fee provides web hosting so I upgraded. I started using Kompozer to build a website. I don’t think it’s going to be adequate to what I want to do and also I've had problems with it -- the cable provider says it's creating problems and they recommend using their tool to build the website. It’s free. But I don’t like its templates -- they're not suited to what I want to do. I am now worried about this host provider not being compatible with whatever website building tool I choose. I'm not sure if I should be - don't know enough about it. I want to find a website building tool that gives me freedom to design the look of my site. I'm somewhat tech savvy and willing to deal with the learning curve. Do I need to have a web host that is compatible with whatever website building tool I use? I am wondering if I need to change from my cable provider to another host. The domain name is my first and last name so if it means changing to another domain name, I really would prefer not to have to do that. Finally, I guess I would want to upload my Legacy pages to the site as opposed to renter data but I don't feel I have seen enough examples here to know what different options there are or how they would look. Is there any way to test print a Legacy page to see what it looks like on the web? What page does one publish to the web -- is it a report? If not, what is it, exactly? Pat Hickin's Wikitree pages appealed to me but he/she (sorry Pat I don’t know if you’re a Patrick or Patricia) said the Legacy conversion to Wikitree was difficult. Any answers to the above questions or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Barton Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing
Legacy support, At this web page: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp why don't you add a comment near the SUBSCRIBE area (maybe inside the blue box at the bottom of the blue box): The comment would read something like: If you subscribe but do not begin receiving e-mails within 5 days, please e-mail supp...@legacyfamilytree.com for assistance in subscribing. Please give the system 5 days before you e-mail us. Thank you Or something like that. 5 days may be too long - the point is to give them an alternate method of subscribing if the main method fails. Yea, I realize you may get impatient folks that do both at the same time, but hopefully most folks will give the main method a reasonable length of time first. This may reduce some of the frustration that some folks have when the regular subscription process fails. Thanks for offering this FREE forum for us users to discuss Legacy! We greatly appreciate it. Bob On 04/11/2015 16:22, Jack Earnshaw wrote: Hi Don There is a fundamental problem with subscribing to the list as many, many people have reported this problem. If you send an email to supp...@legacyfamilytree.com and explain the problem they will subscribe you manually Jack -Original Message- From: Don Cook [mailto:docoo...@msn.com] Sent: 11 April 2015 20:20 To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Testing I have subscribed (I think) but in about 2 weeks I have not yet received a single message. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Testing
Hi Don There is a fundamental problem with subscribing to the list as many, many people have reported this problem. If you send an email to supp...@legacyfamilytree.com and explain the problem they will subscribe you manually Jack -Original Message- From: Don Cook [mailto:docoo...@msn.com] Sent: 11 April 2015 20:20 To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Testing I have subscribed (I think) but in about 2 weeks I have not yet received a single message. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Testing
I have subscribed (I think) but in about 2 weeks I have not yet received a single message. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Testing
You need to contact Legacy support. Lately, the list has been capriciously deleting long-time members, so it's not just new members who are having the problem. As one poster said: Unfortunately this is a longstanding problem which Millennium is unable to fix, and they have just decided to live with it evidently. You will need to contact tech support whenever this happens. CE From: docoo...@msn.com To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Testing Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 13:19:45 -0600 I have subscribed (I think) but in about 2 weeks I have not yet received a single message. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Testing
This is a longstanding problem for new subscribers that Legacy refuses to fix. Write the technical support folks at the email address below and ask them to help you. Barton -Original Message- From: Don Cook [mailto:docoo...@msn.com] Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 3:20 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Testing I have subscribed (I think) but in about 2 weeks I have not yet received a single message. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] testing
Very quiet here. Just testing Markus Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] testing
Hi Marcus, The list has been quite active today - have you received any posts? Have you checked your spam folder? How long have you been subscribed - have you received anything from the list since you joined it? the only post I've seen from this address of yours was almost three years ago, so perhaps you left and came back just recently? In any case, if you're not receiving the posts you should contact Legacy Support for assistance. I don't need to know the answers to the questions you've asked - they're for you to think about, and maybe tell Support the details when/if you contact them. A copy of this email is going directly to Marcus to ensure he sees it. Kind Regards, Wendy Markus Zuercher said the following on 16/05/2014 11:53: Very quiet here… Just testing Markus Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] testing
Haven't been receiving mail from the group for the last week or more. -- Mary LeClerc quiltingm...@gmail.com Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] testing
Your email came through to the group. There has been plenty of activity on the group the past week. I guess you’ll need to contact support (supp...@legacyfamilytree.com). Don’t know if the reset function they use will work in your case. That usually solves the problem for new users whose accounts don’t get started properly. Yours is first I’ve heard of where an active account has just stopped working. From: Mary LeClerc [mailto:quiltingm...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 9:48 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] testing Haven't been receiving mail from the group for the last week or more. -- Mary LeClerc quiltingm...@gmail.com Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Testing subscription
Just a test. Previous subscriptions for me did not work. Bob Hansen Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing subscription
Just a reply. Hopefully this one works for you On 14/10/2013, at 4:27 AM, BobsTree2-Gmail bobstr...@gmail.com wrote: Just a test. Previous subscriptions for me did not work. Bob Hansen Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] testing
Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing
Sometimes the group is silent. --- On Sun, 3/10/13, Oregon Rain duster...@frontier.com wrote: From: Oregon Rain duster...@frontier.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Testing To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Date: Sunday, March 10, 2013, 6:00 AM This is a test message to see if I am actually receiving mail from this list. Nothing has come through since I subscribe to the list day before yesterday. Constance Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing
Well,it works on this end Sent from my Kindle Fire In God We Trust Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing HI from momalot66
Hi I'm trying to get Legacy working correctly on my Apple iMac. I think Apple Mail rule may be giving me problems. Any Apple iMac users or Apple users got ant suggestions? You might want to also cc me off line: momalo...@me.com, but is that legal for our Legacy User Group? John Roose, do you use rules? Is that why you might be having problems? On Apr 14, 2011, at 6:37 AM, John Roose wrote: Hi On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Corinne Fordschmid cfordsch...@bluewin.ch wrote: Although I’m on the mailing list, I don’t seem to be getting any messages. Legacy support have re-subscribed me so this is just a test to see if it now works. Perhaps some of you could just respond with a quick “Hi” and I’ll see if they get through the mystery blocker! Thanks Corinne Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp -- Genealogy - - - - - it's in my blood! Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing
Hi On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Corinne Fordschmid cfordsch...@bluewin.chwrote: Although I’m on the mailing list, I don’t seem to be getting any messages. Legacy support have re-subscribed me so this is just a test to see if it now works. Perhaps some of you could just respond with a quick “Hi” and I’ll see if they get through the mystery blocker! Thanks Corinne Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp -- Genealogy - - - - - it's in my blood! Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing
Hide-ho Neighbor loud and clear ! Tim R. (Copy sent to her personally) On 4/14/2011 5:32 AM, Corinne Fordschmid wrote: Although I’m on the mailing list, I don’t seem to be getting any messages. Legacy support have re-subscribed me so this is just a test to see if it now works. Perhaps some of you could just respond with a quick “Hi†and I’ll see if they get through the mystery blocker! Thanks Corinne Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing
Spelling Correction Hidee-ho Neighbor Probably still wrong ? Taken from Home Improvement. Tim R. On 4/14/2011 7:50 AM, Tim Rosenlof wrote: Hide-ho Neighbor loud and clear ! Tim R. (Copy sent to her personally) On 4/14/2011 5:32 AM, Corinne Fordschmid wrote: Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing
Hi from Rich in LA CA --- On Thu, 4/14/11, Corinne Fordschmid cfordsch...@bluewin.ch wrote: From: Corinne Fordschmid cfordsch...@bluewin.ch Subject: [LegacyUG] Testing To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Date: Thursday, April 14, 2011, 4:32 AM Although I’m on the mailing list, I don’t seem to be getting any messages. Legacy support have re-subscribed me so this is just a test to see if it now works. Perhaps some of you could just respond with a quick “Hi” and I’ll see if they get through the mystery blocker! Thanks Corinne Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Testing
Sorry to anyone who does receive this, but a number of us are not and I am testing for SPAM filtering. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] testing
I'm testing to see if my message ever shows up. So far it hasn't. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] testing
I am in correspondence with Collene through our Support system about this issue so there's no need for a string of messages that her message came through. Sincerely, Sherry Technical Support Legacy Family Tree On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Collene Pearce acpea...@sbcglobal.net wrote: I'm testing to see if my message ever shows up. So far it hasn't. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] testing only
Regards Stuart Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] TESTING IGNORE
I am having trouble trying to recieve email from the list Just tesing John Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Testing
Testing Arlene DT Team Member http://www.paperimagerydesigns.com My Blog http://alteredbyme.blogspot.com Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Testing - please ignore
Please ignore this message - I am trying to see if my email rule re Plain Text to LUG is working. Cheers Jan Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Testing - please ignore
Sorry - looks like I have to check every time I send to LUG Cheers Jan From: Jan Roberts [mailto:poo...@ozemail.com.au] Sent: Thursday, 20 May 2010 18:03 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Testing - please ignore Please ignore this message – I am trying to see if my email rule re Plain Text to LUG is working. Cheers Jan Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing - please ignore
On 2010/05/20 10:03, Jan Roberts wrote: Please ignore this message – I am trying to see if my email rule re Plain Text to LUG is working. No, it's not! Looking at the message source, you've got a text part and an html part. -- Regards, Mike Fry Johannesburg Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Testing - please ignore
On 2010/05/20 10:06, Jan Roberts wrote: Sorry - looks like I have to check every time I send to LUG That one was plain text :-) -- Regards, Mike Fry Johannesburg Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp