On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:37 AM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
It's clearly not the same difficulty. And the point of this is that it's
going to be almost impossible to detect a derived database in use. You said
yourself that you'd just assume that anyone processing OSM data would be
presumed
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:37 AM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
The example I described above clearly demonstrates that you can't
differentiate between company A who doesn't use a derived database and
company B who does.
What if company C makes a derived database and gives it to company D?
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:37 AM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
The example I described above
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Okay, so if company C makes derived database and gives it to company D,
then
company D creates tiles with that database, company D has to offer the
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Okay, so if company C makes derived database and gives it to company D,
then
company D
