Hi Elliot,
For me, yes and yes but. I mapped most of central Sydney myself
originally and am delighted. Your use clearly indicates two separate
layers which the community says is OK, you don't need to share alike
the 3D model ... though perhaps you can consider it? As for the
credits,
Anthony o...@... writes:
There isn't a switch to ODbL. Just a (not very practical IMHO) plan to do so
at some point in the future,
Did you see my addendum? I don't trust the OSMF to properly remove
all of my work and derivatives of my work if/when they stop releasing
those derivatives under
Anthony,
Anthony wrote:
I don't trust the OSMF to properly remove
all of my work and derivatives of my work if/when they stop releasing
those derivatives under CC-BY-SA.
In December last year we had a guy also called Anthony on legal-talk who
said:
I live in the United States, where
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Frederik Ramm frede...@... writes:
By the way, the database right exists - in certain jurisdictions like
the EU - even if it is not asserted. That means, OSMF is likely to hold
database rights over the database even today. But
Ed Avis wrote:
Anthony writes:
I'm currently working on a fork.
I'm still hopeful that people will find some compromise, and it won't be
needed. (Myself I would be quite happy if the project chose a dual
licence.) But if a fork proves necessary, I'll be happy to help.
My impression
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Anthony,
Anthony wrote:
I don't trust the OSMF to properly remove
all of my work and derivatives of my work if/when they stop releasing
those derivatives under CC-BY-SA.
In December last year we had a guy also called
On 9 August 2010 23:11, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Alternatively, you could perhaps contribute to CommonMap (commonmap.info)
who are not a fork of OSM but acknowledge OSM as inspiration and are not
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Ed Avis wrote:
Anthony writes:
I'm currently working on a fork.
I'm still hopeful that people will find some compromise, and it won't be
needed. (Myself I would be quite happy if the project chose a dual
I have been away from the grand fray for several weeks due to
personal matters and have been catching up with threads on this
list. One question, I think from Liz, was who decided to remove
data. That got me thinking as there was never any explicit decision
point. Therefore I have a question
On 10 August 2010 01:29, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
they exert their original copyright and request us to do so? A common
mantra is that copyright does not mean much unless exerted. Views?
Precedents?
This is a slippery slope, and it would give precedent to what ever
comes next
Heiko,
Heiko Jacobs wrote:
If you really consider your contributions to be in the public domain
then good news for you: we do not require your agreeing to any contract.
Did I miss something? On
https://docs.google.com/View?id=dc3bxdhs_0cc77vdd9
I only read this three possibilities:
[Agree
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
If you really consider your contributions to be in the public domain then
good news for you: we do not require your agreeing to any contract.
No, I'll simply take his data and upload it under an account which I sign up
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:11 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Aug 9, 2010, at 7:14 AM, Anthony wrote:
If that was you back then: Why should you request OSMF to properly
remove
all of your work when at the same time you have no problem with OSM
using
my contributions in any way
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Imports are bad enough in the effect they have on the surveying
community.
You are welcome to join a 48,000 km kayak trip to survey the Australian
coastline.
However
If there is
2010/8/10 Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-l...@deelkar.net:
The Ideal would be PD/CC0, because that wouldn't limit us in so many ways.
That's not true, it wouldn't limit what terms could be placed on end
users of the data, it would increasingly limit what contributors can
do.
2010/8/9 Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-l...@deelkar.net:
Yes, easier said than done. But in my opinion a free and open
geodatabase of the world is only free if it doesn't impose limits on
it's uses.
If you use OSM in a work, say that you used OSM, and don't sue anybody
for copying that work.
Is that
16 matches
Mail list logo
