2010/9/23 Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@latuviitta.fi:
What is hard is to give attribution and show the license. Of course I can
add Access constraints element to the service metadata
ows:AccessConstraintsData from OSM, license
CC-BY-SA/ows:AccessConstraints
I'd say that is satisfying
Dave F. dave...@... writes:
OS Opendata compatibility with the new proposed license Contribution
Terms as they're worded *at this moment*.
The current contributor terms for new accounts require you grant a licence to
the OSMF to do 'any act that is restricted by copyright', subject to section
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
The current contributor terms for new accounts require you grant a licence to
the OSMF to do 'any act that is restricted by copyright', subject to section 3
which says that OSMF will distribute under CC-BY-SA, ODbL/DbCL, or
On 24 September 2010 10:36, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Dave F. dave...@... writes:
OS Opendata compatibility with the new proposed license Contribution
Terms as they're worded *at this moment*.
The current contributor terms for new accounts require you grant a licence to
the OSMF to
Grant,
On 24 September 2010 20:21, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Ordnance Survey's OpenData license specifically allows sub-licensing,
restricted by the need for attribution. There isn't a conflict with
the 'free and open licence' when section 4 (attribution) is taken into
Grant Slater openstreet...@... writes:
Ordnance Survey's OpenData license specifically allows sub-licensing,
restricted by the need for attribution. There isn't a conflict with
the 'free and open licence' when section 4 (attribution) is taken into
account.
I don't think this is quite enough:
On 24 September 2010 12:10, David Dean dd...@ieee.org wrote:
Grant,
On 24 September 2010 20:21, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Ordnance Survey's OpenData license specifically allows sub-licensing,
restricted by the need for attribution. There isn't a conflict with
the 'free
On 09/24/2010 02:06 PM, 80n wrote:
From OS I have a a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, non-exclusive
licence. But for the CTs I need a worldwide, royalty-free,
non-exclusive, perpetual, *irrevocable* license.
There's no revocation or termination language in the OS licence, so I
assume
On 24 September 2010 14:06, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
The CTs state:
You agree to only add Contents for which You are the copyright holder
Which seems fairly clear to me.
It then goes on to say If You are not the copyright holder of the Contents,
You represent and warrant that You have
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On 09/24/2010 02:06 PM, 80n wrote:
From OS I have a a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, non-exclusive
licence. But for the CTs I need a worldwide, royalty-free,
non-exclusive, perpetual, *irrevocable* license.
10 matches
Mail list logo
