Richard, have you or any of the LWG members done any work for MapQuest,
Skobbler and / or Cloudmade ?
--
I'm led to believe that people have been issuing LWG with private lists of
demands that they want met before they will consent to ODbL+CT.
Could I ask that said people have the courtesy to
Let's be clear that Cloudmade have not been in any private discussions, nor
made any demands of OSMF or the lwg.
We support odbl and I think most (if not all) of us have accepted the new cts.
I'd be curious where this came from.
Jim Brown -CTO CloudMade
(Sent from my iPhone)
+44 7595 367 664
Quintin Driver wrote:
Richard, have you or any of the LWG members done any work for MapQuest,
Skobbler and / or Cloudmade ?
Wow. I'm not an LWG member and I've never done any work for MapQuest,
Skobbler and/or CloudMade.
Where on earth did that come from and what on earth has it got to do
On 8 June 2011 10:49, Quintin Driver quentindrive...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard, have you or any of the LWG members done any work for MapQuest,
Skobbler and / or Cloudmade ?
Richard Fairhurst is not a member of the LWG or the OSMF Board. He was
a member of 2007 OSMF Board.
Skobbler, Cloudmade
On 2011-06-08 03:25, David Groom wrote:
Why do you and some others think that the majority of the contributors
are dumb sheeps who will sign everything?
1) Because I've seen postings to various OSM emailing lists along the
lines of:
(i) I trust OSM to get it right and so I just agreed to the
Hi Grant,
thanks for assuring me that the sysadmins have no interest in participating in
behaviour that is harmful to the community.
Does this mean that I will not be chucked out of the community by the
sysadmins?
I am willing to grant the OSFM + 2/3 of the community the right to relicense
On 08/06/11 17:59, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer wrote:
the claim that
everyone who likes the Share-Alike-principle is a fanatic.
I'm certainly a copyleft fanatic, but I'm sure there are some entirely
reasonable copyleft proponents as well.
- Rob.
___
Hi,
Grant Slater wrote:
On 8 June 2011 17:59, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer o...@amen-online.de wrote:
If I am correctly informed, then there are no plans to change the problematic
language in the CT, and the sysadmins have no plans to allow me to keep
contributing. Or am I missing something?
Dermot,
Dermot McNally wrote:
I am willing to grant the OSFM + 2/3 of the community the right to relicense
my contributions in the following ways:
* the current versions of the ODbL and/or of the CC-BY-SA,
* all past and future versions of the ODbL and/or of the CC-BY-SA,
* all licenses that
Quoting Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
I'm led to believe that people have been issuing LWG with private
lists of demands that they want met before they will consent to ODbL+CT.
Yes, I attended to previous LWG teleconference and I asked for LWG, as a
committee, to enter into direct
10 matches
Mail list logo
