In general the CC-by licences require downstream attribution that we
can't provide for any sensible meaning of the word, so you will need
specific permission in any case, the other part is that the 4.0 licences
try to cater for sui generis databases and, IMHO-only, that comes out
rather wrong.
Ivan
The problem is that it is a legal can of worms. I would suggest simply
asking for explicit permission, or at least formal confirmation that
tracing from the imagery does not create a derivative work and that the
government has no rights in such vectorized data.
It is, as you may have seen
Hi Simon. Thanks for the answer.
Just an extra quesiton, doesn't a CC-BY license already allows derivative
work of any kind as long as the author is mentioned? Why would an extra
permission for that be required?
Best Regards.
Ivan.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch
Thanks a lot for the answer Simon, really complete.
Ivan.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
In general the CC-by licences require downstream attribution that we
can't provide for any sensible meaning of the word, so you will need
specific permission in any
On 7/13/2015 3:09 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
It is, as you may have seen from previous discussions, not clear if the
CC 4.0 licences are compatible (with the exception of CC0 naturally)
with the ODbL and this is likely not an issue that will be resolved
short term.
To clarify a bit, any CC
Hi Ivan,
I would suggest getting in touch with Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team
Indonesia. They could probably help in facilitate of permission.
team...@hotosm.org is the best way to reach them.
Best,
-Kate
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Ivan Garcia capisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks a lot
