On 04.04.14 21:09, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> this wasn't obvious to me, I can understand that they can charge whatever
> they want for making available a copy, but I didn't know they could further
> contractually forbid to redistribute / copy / upload to wiki commons etc.,
> even if the mater
On 07.06.13 11:07, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> At least for the "substantial" part of your question I believe if a
> professional geo service provider like map box would decide to use OSM to
> satisfy its geocoding needs, it is obvious that this use would be
> "substantial", or you could use it on
On 16.11.11 12:28, Simon Poole wrote:
>
> Currently there is no agreement on what exactly the rules/policy/algorithm
> will be to determine which objects or tags will survive the transition
Sorry, but that's the core of the problem: this /has/ to be set first. ASAP.
First we need the rules, then w
Hello,
there is something wrong with the license status P2 shows...
A node without tags holds only one information: its location (lat+lon). So for
instance:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/246625694
was last edited by me (I put the node there), I agreed to the terms, but P2
showes this
