On 16.11.11 12:28, Simon Poole wrote: > > Currently there is no agreement on what exactly the rules/policy/algorithm > will be to determine which objects or tags will survive the transition
Sorry, but that's the core of the problem: this /has/ to be set first. ASAP. First we need the rules, then we can execute them. Doing thing's without knowing if they are necessary is stupid. > That said, I believe P2 now has a tool that will completly replace a node with > a new one at the same coordinates which is a bit of a fix for your specific > issue. Throwing overboard the whole history just because nobody thought about it is not a great idea. Even further, there should be situations (according to Frederic's talk at FOSSGIS in Heidelberg) where the locals should decide if things should be kept or not. There should be set means to do this... It's somewhat strange that a timeframe is set without the prerequisites (the housework!) having been finished... /al _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
