From: Luis Villa [mailto:lvi...@wikimedia.org]
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 3:17 PM
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Community Guidelines (was Re: Attribution)
The LWG has spent considerable time discussing the geocoding issue, so
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Luis
The LWG has spent considerable time discussing the geocoding issue, so
it is not as if we've ignored the subject.
Didn't mean to imply that work hasn't been done! I've read all the public
threads I can find :) But the
Luis
The LWG has spent considerable time discussing the geocoding issue, so
it is not as if we've ignored the subject.
To illustrate just one of the issues, have a look at the first mail you
reference from Olov, he defines Geocoding as The process of finding and
storing the latitude and
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
We also have a number of issues that are very immature in terms of
constructing a useful guideline. What we have been lacking, with some
notable exceptions, is data users prepared to give a real use case that
they can
On 28/04/2014 23:27, Mikel wrote:
Further I note there was 0 (zero) response to the proposed updated community
guidelines that
go a long way in clarifying a number of the grey areas, indicating that the
whole upset is not
about fixing real issues.
Simon, first i've heard about this. Can you
